Sentences with phrase «claims by climate alarmists»

Not exact matches

Alarmists have drawn some support for increased claims of tropical storminess from a casual claim by Sir John Houghton of the U.N.'s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) that a warmer world would have more evaporation, with latent heat providing more energy for disturbances.

I see another alarmist post from The Climate Action Tracker claims that temperatures are going to rise by 3C above pre-industrial levels by 2100AD, a ludicrous claim that requires.35 C / decade rate of increase.

«The GHG «theory» based on CO2 is a thermodynamic impossibility» Yes, the climate alarmists peddle their pseudoscience claiming that the ghe works by transferring heat / thermal energy from the cold atmosphere to the warmer surface of the earth, more heat / thermal energy than is transferred by the Sun.

So, we can choose to believe a commenter on a political blog claiming people who understand that there is a broad, clear understanding of the primary driver of the observations are «alarmists», «climate cult ``, «duped doomsday climate cultist», «real deniers, of the science and empirical data»,» peddlers of CatastrophicAGW - by - CO2 ``,.

The relationship is not perfect but it represents a significant improvement over the incredibly lame human - CO2 and global warming / climate change relationship claimed by the IPCC's anti-CO2 Climategate scientists and alarmists.

Contrary to Stewart's claim that the world was united by scientific evidence in the early 1990s, even by 1995, there was still only the «suggestion», on the «balance of evidence», that there had been a «discernible human influence on global climate» — and that's in the Summary for Policymakers document, which has consistently been far more alarmist than the more technical parts of the report.

Here is one example of a science - based response to the Rosie O'Donnell (a famous climate alarmist, by the way) and her claim that burning jet fuel can't melt steel so therefore the WTC had to have been destroyed by demolition charges set by Dick Cheney, or something like that.

The climate alarmists have long tried to sell their apocalyptic scam by claiming that their policies will avoid catastrophic increases in global temperatures.

The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change has been vigorously attacked by some environmentalists and global warming alarmists who view it as a threat to their claim of a «consensus» in favor of their extreme views.

In November 2009, Climate Depot once again received international media attention for engaging in a point - by - point rebuttal to Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's alarmist climate Climate Depot once again received international media attention for engaging in a point - by - point rebuttal to Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd's alarmist climate climate claims.

From New Zealand comes another example of climate alarmists «adjusting» temperatures upward to claim global warming that isn't, in fact, occurring, as shown by Joanne Nova «s excellent blog.

Some good new research highlighted by Dr Roy Spencer showing that climate sensitivity is much lower than claimed by the IPCC alarmists.

It shows the dishonesty of the small group of climate sci - entists, desperate to preserve the gravy train of public funds generated by phoney climate alarmist claims.

But a sober reading of the literature put out by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) does not support the alarmist message or the claim that immediate and drastic action is needed to mitigate climate Climate Change (IPCC) does not support the alarmist message or the claim that immediate and drastic action is needed to mitigate climate climate change.

· Subject all such information to proper peer review by independent scientists, including the significant numbers of experts who are skeptical of alarmist pollution and climate change claims;

Although such arguments continue to rage, there is no doubt that there is a significant body of scientific opinion (as well as published peer - reviewed literature [5]-RRB- that is sceptical of the alarmist claims by green activists about the effect of carbon dioxide emissions on the climate.

This scaremongering claim by Gore is a perfect example of what presenter Marc Morano means by the «Climate Hustle»: just like in a card game where tricksters use sleight - of - hand, distraction techniques, and dirty tricks in order to con the mark (the mug punter) out of his money, so the alarmist establishment is withholding key details and presenting false or distorted information in order to extract vast sums from the gullible public.

Government - funded scientists, the Green's anti-CO2 activists and the mainstream media - alarmists have all claimed that the current drought being suffered by the US west coast is the extreme climate change Americans have never experienced before.

This is the same data set used by much of the climate science cabal, agenda - driven politicians and the alarmist mainstream media to claim the «Hottest Year Ever» meme.

Climate alarmists are constantly trying to justify their misguided goal of decreasing emissions of carbon dioxide (CO2), one of the basic molecules that makes possible life on Earth, by making various claims as to the alleged adverse effects of increasing emissions of CO2.

A recent report finds that data sets used by climate alarmists are not a valid representation of reality, including their repeated claims of highest recorded average temperatures.

By «actual state of science,» he meant the imploding claims and forecasts made by UN panels and government - funded alarmist «scientists» — many of whom were exposed in the ClimateGate scandal conspiring to «hide the decline» in temperatures, censor climate heretics, and violate Freedom of Information lawBy «actual state of science,» he meant the imploding claims and forecasts made by UN panels and government - funded alarmist «scientists» — many of whom were exposed in the ClimateGate scandal conspiring to «hide the decline» in temperatures, censor climate heretics, and violate Freedom of Information lawby UN panels and government - funded alarmist «scientists» — many of whom were exposed in the ClimateGate scandal conspiring to «hide the decline» in temperatures, censor climate heretics, and violate Freedom of Information laws.