Sentences with phrase «claims by foreign investors»

Commentators have speculated that the move may be connected with certain unfavourable decisions against the country in existing BIT claims by foreign investors.

Not exact matches

In a 2013 meeting filmed by investors, Byrne described himself as acting as CEO of EuroFX, which claimed to have special techniques to trade foreign exchange.

This time, Pomerantz established the right of individual foreign investors who purchased foreign - traded shares of a foreign corporation to pursue claims for securities fraud in a U.S. court, thereby overcoming obstacles created by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 read more

He successfully argued that foreign and domestic investors had asserted viable «holder claims» seeking to recover investment losses due to their retention of already - owned shares in reliance upon the fraud, which is believed to be the first ruling by a U.S. court sustaining such a theory under English common law.

In October 2014, Pomerantz once again secured crucial victories in this ground - breaking litigation, establishing the right of individual foreign investors who purchased shares on a non-U.S. exchange to pursue claims for securities fraud in a U.S. court, thereby overcoming obstacles created by Morrison.

On January 31, 2015, JPMC agreed to pay $ 99.5 million to settle claims by a class of investors who alleged that JPMC, along with twelve other banks, conspired to rig the $ 5.3 trillion - a-day foreign exchange market.

This time, Pomerantz established the right of individual foreign investors who purchased foreign - traded shares of a foreign corporation to pursue claims for securities fraud in a U.S. court, thereby overcoming obstacles created by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 decision in Morrison v. Nat» l Australia Bank Ltd..

The ISDS system empowers foreign investors and corporations to skirt domestic courts and attack domestic policies by going before tribunals of three corporate lawyers to adjudicate claims.

To a foreign investor affected by such judicial measures, it is not always clear, however, what judicial measures (especially in countries like India with one of the most activist Supreme Courts in the world) can be subject to a claim under investment treaty law; which theory of liability is appropriate for a state's liability arising out of judiciary's conduct (or omissions); and which policy issues these different theories of liability raise.

But as more capital has begun to travel in the opposite direction, established democracies like Canada will increasingly have to respond to claims brought against them by foreign investors.

Legal claims brought against a Sovereign State or its instrumentalities by a foreign investor under a bilateral or multilateral investment treaty, or a contract or a domestic investment law, require a legal team of the highest international caliber: with great expertise in international law, a deep understanding of the civil and common law systems, extensive experience in the various fora and rules under which claims are raised, an enhanced capability to analyze complex facts and industries, broad language abilities, and sensitivity to political and cultural issues in the various regions of the world.

Last fall, Eli Lilly launched a $ 500 - million complaint under the North American Free Trade Agreement claiming Canada violated obligations to foreign investors by allowing its courts to invalidate patents for two of its drugs.

As for cryptocurrencies and tokens exchanged for other cryptocurrencies, Rubles and foreign currencies, Minfin claims to protect the rights of unqualified investors by allowing trading only via authorized cryptocurrency exchange operators.