Sentences with phrase «claims cases since»

Not exact matches

Since the OCC has not reached a final decision on the fintech charters, the claim of harm by the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) was speculative, U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich wrote in her decision tossing out the case, issued late on Monday.

Looking at the S&P Case - Shiller 20 city composite index as a sanity check no your fraudulent claim shows that since 2009 the index has only advanced 20 %, that means that on say a $ 500,000 your home equity due to appreciation would roughly be $ 100,000, so you would have to had put down close to $ 150,000 as a down payment, yet you did this on one income and you have kids and you make only $ 130,000 / year, sorry doesn't add up.

Next, justify why it will be offered to you for free, such as the goodwill of the now - rich creator, beta testing, or some future profit sharing (which applies in this case since they claim that the successful trader will take a cut in the future).

Albeit in footnotes, but perhaps most significantly, the Coinflip case put the CFTC on record as concluding that Bitcoin, while a commodity, is not a currency.6 In summarizing the facts of the case, the CFTC explained that Bitcoin is «distinct from «real currencies»» of the United States or another country.7 In addition, the CFTC Order in the Coinflip settlement specifically noted that the Bitcoin options were not eligible for the CFTC's «trade option exemption» in CFTC Rule 32.3.8 Since the CFTC's trade option exemption can only be claimed for an option that would result in delivery of an «exempt» or agricultural commodity, this violation in effect serves as the CFTC's finding that it will not treat Bitcoin as a currency.

It is out of the question to try to grasp God through sight (which is the equivalent of reducing truth to reality), to claim that what one sees can be God (in this case one converts reality into truth), or to make a representation of something in the spiritual realm (which is the same as consecrating a religion, since religions always belong to the visual realm).

Regardless of whether I made a case for «adaptation», there is clearly evidence of change since the original texts, therefore your claim is inaccurate.

(In any case, since the Reformation, there have emerged several «orthodoxies», each claiming to be the true one).

I incline to classify these examples as misleading attempts to find parallels between science and theology since, in both cases, God is predicated on other grounds and science is brought in to support this claim.

Since we are bombarded daily by the mass media with news and views on the economy and economic policies, it is necessary to be trained to demythologize the claimed orthodoxies of economists, academics, policy makers and media programmes, as is accepted in the case of the stories of the scared scriptures.

Since God starts at the conceptual pole, and this conceptual pole is complete and therefore satisfied (according to Whitehead, Suchocki claims that God starts where other entities end — at satisfaction — and that in God's case this satisfaction follows what in other actual entities precedes — the concrescence (EE 139 - 140).

Now since the case is cleared, and I assume that you realized your mistake about believing on false claims was nothing more than wasting time, and you promise not to repeat such mistake again, we can approve of you staying.

He claims he can travel so extensively because he's able to work remotely, since only 1 percent of his cases go to trial.

I'm always skeptical about claims of being «sensitive» or «gentle», since it's not always the case.

Davis argues that, since the Lincolnshire case, the wind industry is using more complicated corporate structures to reduce the likelihood of legal claims being brought against operators.

In this case, it is more advantageous for him to publish the emails himself since he can claim he is transparent.

Faso also makes the claim that both Long's GOP opponents — Nassau County Comptroller George Maragos and Rep. Bob Turner — have «deep pocckets,» which might be true in Maragos» case, since he's largely self - funding, but certainly isn't true for Turner.

They have since U-turned on both the timing and the scale of the austerity measures; Cable claims he was persuaded of the case for deep and early cuts, «not by other politicians, but by talking to the most senior officials in the government and the central bank [who said] that we had to act».

This intriguing revelation by the ICC didn't come as a surprise to some of us who have been following this case since 2010 and have always been of the view that the Supreme Court of Ghana erred in linking Mr.Woyome's claims for works done for the state in 2005 to a waterville contract in 2006 on which basis it asked Mr.Woyome to refund all his entitlement paid him.

Trump claims the jurist can't be impartial in the case since Curial is of Mexican heritage and Trump plans to build a wall along the southern border.

«It's taken a long time,» he says - but the claim is there that he has been on the case since being elected.

(c) And also for * submissions based on the assertion that Mr. Woyome had no contract with the Government of Ghana * and therefore had no valid claims against the Government be determined by the High Court, and not by this Court (the Supreme Court), since they do not involve, according to the relevant case law, the interpretation and enforcement of the Constitution and do not therefore fall within the ambit of the Court's original jurisdiction under Article 130 (1) of the 1992 Constitution.

Debunking claims that his corruption case at the court has thawed since he started campaigning for President Muhammadu Buhari's re-election, a former governor of Abia state...

Oh do nt forget that to anyone who actually knows something about the laws of physics and metallurgy, that in order to eliminate a large variance in repeatability, you will have to by law, dictate the material, and properties of the components for the firing pins, shell casings and primers for every single firearm made (designers and manufacturers set these material properties and types during design based on use and cost), since this or any other law does not, and it is so easy to beat, any claim to this being smart is f# # $ % $ # stupid.

Since 2001 autism claims have outnumbered nonautism cases almost four to one.

The claim that a doubling of CO2 would begin to approach the difference from the LGM only makes sense if «today» means today since then it would be a doubling in both cases.

But since then the agencies have had a protracted feud, a document obtained by STAT shows, with the CDC claiming that health officials disregarded the established case definition for identifying affected infants — creating the illusion of far fewer affected infants than there may in fact be.

Since the first widely publicized case in which a claim of educational malpractice was made — a 1976 California suit brought by a high - school graduate who charged he was illiterate — state courts, including New York's, have continued to turn...

Boutrous told reporters during a Wednesday conference call that the Rodriguez decision «left open the possibility that a claim like ours could succeed» since that case focused on school funding disparities while this lawsuit focuses on the limited options students have to leave failing schools.

No copier with a phony copyright claim has dared to bring a case to court in the US since Bridgeman v. Corel.

If, for instance, your parents paid for your room and board, it's not clear whether you could legitimately claim that you used the scholarship money to pay for that, since you didn't pay for it at all (although in this case your parents could possibly be able to claim the AOC themselves).

Will my nominee face any problem in case of a claim, since I didn't mentioned the details of expired policies.?

Since Susan and Brendan's claim was less than $ 25,000, they paid $ 200 to start a case at small claims court.

Since the OFT announcement to run a test case into bank account charges in July 2007 a few banks requested that credit card claims be dealt with in the same way, and sadly some local court judges did although the OFT test case is specifically about current accounts.

Personally, I'd prefer to claim as many withholdings as I can, and be sure to have some money aside in case it turns out that I have to owe a little bit, since it means I get more take - home pay throughout the year.

Question 2: Since this doesn't seem to be the case, how does this company know that I potentially have unclaimed assets to claim?

Since this doesn't seem to be the case, how does this company know that I potentially have unclaimed assets to claim?

This could be a case where a price guarantee claim would be effective, especially since it seems to be a mistake.

That agrees with my result that the claim of no warming since 1997 (or 1998 in this case) is falsified.

In any case, when the 5th Assessment Report of Working Group 1 was published in September 2013, much of the media attention focused on one particular section in the Summary for Policymakers which claimed that it was «extremely likely» that human activity was responsible for most of the global warming since the 1950s.

BTW charles, in case you missed it, my comment about clowns was about those who still say it's been cooling for the past decade, not about claims it's been cooling since 1998.

And of course, that doesn't stop the anti-scientists from saying things like «no warming since 1995» and also trying things like «it's been cooling since 1998» even though statistical significance is absent in either case, especially with the cooling since 1998 claim.

By 2018 very few were taking Ms Laurie's claims seriously any more, especially since the value of her evidence has been discredited in several court cases and since the Waubra Foundation has been making more and more ridiculous claims.

However, if this was correct reasoning one could claim with equal validity, using the same data set and time period, that there has been global warming over the recent 20 - year period, since the trend is also not statistically significantly distinguishable from the trend estimate over the time period since 1979 («global warming» is the Null - hypothesis in this case), which itself is highly statistically significantly different from a Zero - trend (RSS: 0.124 + / -0.067 deg.

Since the plaintiffs claimed that burning of fossil fuels puts deadly CO2 into the atmosphere, causing all their forecasted death & destruction, then why didn't the oil companies ask the judge for a restraining order to prevent the plaintiffs from burning any more fossil fuels at least until the case was settled one way or the other?

Since then, literally thousands of papers have made this case very carefully, tens to hundreds of thousands of climate simulations have been run, model errors have been corrected and resolution improved, hundreds of problems in the science have been corrected and claims that humans aren't the source have all been addressed.

Some models, e.g. INM - CM 3.0 predict an increase until 2025, but in any case since the models start their «prediction run» in about year 2000, there has not been enough time to validate or invalidate their claims on a statistically valid basis.

Of over 62,000 commercial cases filed since 2009, 80 percent include a breach of contract claim and 57 percent include a business tort claim.

Since the high court's order was issued in a proceeding that is ongoing, the plaintiff's claim for damages may still prevail, although he will be unable to prevent the defendant's proposed expert from performing a medical examination on him before the case proceeds to trial.

It is critical to act quickly if you believe that you may have a medical malpractice claim, since certain procedural requirements must be met at the outset of the case.

Since these cases are usually complex, you should always consult with an experienced drunk driving accident lawyers before filing a claim.