Sentences with phrase «claims court because»

The other driver had mentioned they might bring the case to small claims court because they were unhappy with the results of the mediation.

Still, there are some provincially appointed officials adjudicating disputes in the Small Claims Court because according to the Ontario Courts webpage there are currently two provincially appointed judges sitting (http://www.ontariocourts.ca/scj/judges/current/provincial-deputy/).

Shadi Amin, otherwise known as Soheila Amintorabi, brought claims against Arsham Parsi, otherwise known as Alireza Abrishami, in Toronto Small Claims Court because she believed he was behind anonymous posts on multiple websites and letters sent to Amnesty International and the BBC.

Not exact matches

U.S. Supreme Court justices expressed support on Tuesday for Microsoft's bid to fend off class action claims by Xbox 360 owners who say the video game console gouges discs because of a design defect.

Dale fought back and ultimately won in court, but claims he had to shut down in 2006 because the Canadian Real Estate Association maintained similar rules nationally that discriminated against discount brokerages.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan reversed a lower court judge's dismissal of investors» antitrust claims against 16 banks, including Deutsche Bank AG, UBS AG, Bank of America (bac) and J.P. Morgan because she found no showing of anticompetitive Court of Appeals in Manhattan reversed a lower court judge's dismissal of investors» antitrust claims against 16 banks, including Deutsche Bank AG, UBS AG, Bank of America (bac) and J.P. Morgan because she found no showing of anticompetitive court judge's dismissal of investors» antitrust claims against 16 banks, including Deutsche Bank AG, UBS AG, Bank of America (bac) and J.P. Morgan because she found no showing of anticompetitive harm.

He said their attempts to move the case from the state court in Los Angeles where Daniels filed her claim to a federal court is because it would increase the chances that the matter will be decided in private arbitration, «thus hiding the truth from the public.»

«Because there is no genuine dispute of material fact that Sulyma had actual knowledge of the facts comprising claims I and III, as well as knowledge of the disclosures he alleges were unlawfully inadequate in claims II and IV, the Court grants defendants» motion for summary judgment on those claims, finding them time - barred,» Cousins wrote in his opinion.

He said their attempts to move the case from the state court in Los Angeles where Daniels filed her claim to a federal court is because that would increase the chances the matter be decided in private arbitration, «thus hiding the truth from the public.»

While predatory pricing technically remains illegal, it is extremely difficult to win predatory pricing claims because courts now require proof that the alleged predator would be able to raise prices and recoup its losses.405 Revising predatory pricing doctrine to reflect the economics of platform markets, where firms can sink money for years given unlimited investor backing, would require abandoning the recoupment requirement in cases of below - cost pricing by dominant platforms.

The Third Circuit upheld the trial court's ruling that plaintiffs failed to state a monopolization claim because they failed to allege a harm to the competitive process, as opposed to individual competitors.

The company was hauled into Canadian court because of hyped - up claims, like «bottled water is the most environmentally responsible consumer product in the world» - a classic and transparent case of greenwashing.

That said, some are hesitant: this Twitter user, a Japanese investor, claims that, in fact, the September 18th court hearing is irrelevant because Kobayashi already has been authorized to sell - off — meaning he doesn't have to wait to off - load more coins.

But in mid-March, he filed a claim in federal court maintaining that because Daniels violated her NDA, he'll seek at least $ 20 million from her — $ 1 million per (unspecified) breach.

A group that claims a sincere religious belief in staying high all the time will probably lose its ease, not because it is necessarily insincere but because any drug defendant could make that claim and courts have no good way to know who is telling the truth.

In those cases the court deferred to the judgment of the Air Force that the free - exercise claim of a Jewish officer who wore his yarmulke on duty could not be accommodated; it deferred to the judgment of correctional authorities that the free - exercise claim of a Black Muslim to attend Friday afternoon religious services could not be accommodated; it deferred to the judgment of the Department of Agriculture's Forest Service that building a logging road through a national forest was necessary despite the damage to religious practices of Native American tribes in that area; it deferred to the Internal Revenue Service's ruling that Bob Jones University was not entitled to tax exemption because of its religiously motivated rule against interracial dating and marriage on campus; it deferred to the judgment of the secretary of labor that a religious community must pay its members the minimum wage for work they performed in the group's business although the members said they had religious objections to being paid for their work.

But the court's resistance to those claims was not, in my view, because of any mindless fealty to «separation between church and state» — quite the contrary.

So for them to think a blogger who has allowed discussion on the issues surrounding Tony as a public figure who used his privilege to control — is going to take it down blog posts simply because those who support the NPD or the NPD himself claims the «court» says so, must think we all fell off the turnip truck.

Thomas Jefferson condemned the decision precisely because he viewed it as claiming a power of the courts to impose constitutional interpretations on the other branches.

Small claims court cases are much cheaper than superior court cases for both the plaintiff (the person doing the suing) and the defendant (the person being sued) because the parties are not allowed to have any attorneys represent them and other rules that simplify the lawsuit process, making the whole thing much cheaper, faster, and easier.

Riggs claims he had contemplated serving underhand at some point in the match but changed his mind because he didn't want to «embarrass» Court.

March 20 — A British football agent who claims he missed out on a lucrative World Cup sponsorship deal because of FIFA's behaviour has finally won the right to take the organisation to court in the UK.

The district court held that the composition claims were inherently misleading because «they imply a compositional difference between those products that are produced with rb [ST] and those that are not,» in contravention of the FDA's finding that there is no measurable compositional difference between the two.

They had argued they should be accountable to parliament rather than the courts because, under the 1689 Bill of Rights, their expenses claims fell under the category of «proceedings of parliament» - and were therefore protected by privilege.

General Secretary of the ruling National Democratic Congress (NDC) Johnson Asiedu Nketiah has fired a sharp riposte at the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP) for claiming Justice Yaw Apau was appointed to the Supreme Court because he did a «hatchet» job for the government on Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo - Addo.

In papers submitted by the UK Government last year in the case and seen by the BHA, the Government attempted to argue that there is no breach of EU law because «if a teacher brought a claim against a school (on the basis that the school, as an employer, had discriminated against them in their remuneration, for example), then the court or tribunal would consider the legislation in this wider context.

A man claiming to be an unaffiliated voter filed a complaint against Panepinto because he used his wife's image, State Supreme Court Judge Catherine Nugent - Panepinto, in campaign flyers.

The court rejected her claim for compensation because the statute of limitations had expired.

A company importing something from a separate EU customs border, say at Calais, will make a claim at the European Court of Justice (ECJ) because those importing them across the Irish border are having an easier time.

This is because the Court in Miller was not claiming that a well regulated militia is required for gun ownership, but rather that it can be used as a guide as to the appropriate manner and intent of individual gun ownership.

In Manhattan Criminal Court, prosecutors claimed Haggerty was motivated to commit the alleged theft because he wanted to buy out his brother's share of -LSB-...]

A Brooklyn court clerk who claimed her complaints about an allegedly lewd boss were ignored because his wife is a judge was demoted because of absenteeism, the state claims.

In court documents, Oddo's land - use director, Robert E. Englert, claimed that the names were replaced simply because the developer's submissions were too similar to existing Staten Island streets and could confuse first responders in an emergency.

The court presided over by Judge Abena Oppong Adjin - Doku, declared the «Ekikime» hit artiste guilty because the evidence put before the court points out that the manhood displayed by Wisa on stage, was not a fake one as claimed.

At the time, law enforcement claimed that they were breaking the law by selling cigarette's tax free to non-Indian customers, because the US Supreme Court ruled that Indian Nations couldn't claim sovereignty over land they purchased.

The supposed settlement is also being alleged to have been reached to the detriment of Ghana because Attorneys in this Ministry claimed they were under instructions from the Castle to settle the case in court.

The Judge had said that he was baffled with the claim of any further investigation of Dasuki by DSS because the same DSS had filed before the court affidavit evidence that they have completed investigations on Dasuki and ready for his trial.

It asked the court to dismiss the claims in its entirety «with substantial costs because of its frivolity.»

The case is often referred to as Oneida I because it is the first of three times the Oneida Indian Nation reached the Supreme Court in litigating its land rights claims.

«During that call, the defendant claimed, in substance and in part, that there was no issue with him [Silver] getting the fees because he «only represented the LLCs» controlled by Glenwood,» a filing in Manhattan federal court said.

In papers filed Thursday in Brooklyn federal court, Sampson's attorneys claim imposing the 87 - month prison term on July 20 that prosecutors want would «raise significant concerns about unwarranted disparities» — because Skelos got five years.

That charge has not been proven in a court of law, but Baroni and Wildstein resigned several months after the closures, after erroneously claiming the lanes had been shut down because of an innocuous traffic study.

Hopefully, they would consider reducing the deficit that's grown because many of our budget claims, particularly related to the sale and taxation of cigarettes, have been bottled up in the courts.»

Lawyers believe the Home Office is desperate for none of their claims to be tested in court because the evidence against the students would not be strong enough.

The family of a 62 - year - old man who died last year in Nassau County jail custody has filed a $ 60 million federal lawsuit against the county and the facility's former medical provider that claims the inmate died because he was denied proper care, court papers say.

After court, Jones claimed prosecutors only charged Maziarz because of his position as a former state senator.

Steven Stites, a Storobin spokesman, said Felder was trying to blow up an innocent mistake because his own petitions are «rife with fraud,» a claim Storobin's campaign has not made in court.

Shepard said the appeals court did not address Karalunas» main argument that the entire page should be thrown out because the petition carrier falsely claimed to have witnessed each person sign.

In the court papers, though, Cater claims Hoyt called her after JCOPE started its probe to say that the agency would not help her because «he was too powerful and was in contact with the governor directly.»

The appeal, filed in the New York State Supreme Court, claims that, «because freedom from bureaucracy and DOE oversight is the fundamental cornerstone to public charter school design, Success Academy NYC can not sign DOE's illegal contract.»