Sentences with phrase «claims court trial»

I prepared for and attended a small claims court trial.

ICBC brought a motion to dismiss the lawsuit arguing that the Plaintiff was «estopped» from suing again due to the small claims court trial.

During my articling term, I assisted with and attended at trial, attended various motions and other court appearances, drafted litigation materials, attended mediations, conducted my own Small Claims Court trial, met with and interviewed clients and conducted complex legal research.

He was on a Federal Claims Court trial team that won a $ 76 million verdict in a Winstar - related savings & loan case.

The Small Claims Court Trial Judge found in favour of Mr. Nagribanko and awarded the equivalent of four months of salary and benefits in lieu of notice.

While articling at Will Davidson LLP, articling students will complete a very wide range of tasks and assignments, but of note, they will be asked to conduct legal research, prepare legal documents and argument, prepare for and attend at motions, prepare for and assist with trials, maintain carriage of Small Claims Court matters, and conduct Small Claims Court trials independently.

You will attend and conduct meetings with clients, attend Court and Tribunal hearings, argue motions, review leases, draft wills and conduct Small Claims Court trials.

Not exact matches

Mr. Siegal's other client successes include securing a 2016 trial victory in federal court defending Marvel Entertainment against a claim that it stole a patent - holder's design for a Spiderman role play web - shooting toy, and numerous federal and state appellate arguments in criminal and civil matters.

«Requiring the banks to pay treble damages to every plaintiff who ended up on the wrong side of an independent Libor ‐ denominated derivative swap would, if appellants» allegations were proved at trial, not only bankrupt 16 of the world's most important financial institutions, but also vastly extend the potential scope of antitrust liability in myriad markets where derivative instruments have proliferated,» the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York said in the ruling.A U.S. appeals court on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigCourt of Appeals in New York said in the ruling.A U.S. appeals court on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigcourt on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigging.

The Third Circuit upheld the trial court's ruling that plaintiffs failed to state a monopolization claim because they failed to allege a harm to the competitive process, as opposed to individual competitors.

The U.S. Patent Trial and Appeal Board can no longer review only some of the patent claims challenged by petitioners in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, the U.S. Supreme Court said on Tuesday in a 5 - 4 decision.

Following the review's publication, Bishop Peter Hancock, the Church of England's lead safeguarding bishop, said: «At the heart of this case was a judgment, on the balance of probabilities, as to whether, in the event that her claim for compensation reached trial, a court would have concluded that Carol was abused by Bishop Bell.

Deputy High Court judge Rowena Collins - Rice, who considered rival claims during a trial in London earlier this month, is scheduled to deliver a ruling today.

The Supreme Court of India decided this week against detaining Amit Kumar Soren in custody while he awaits trial to answer claims he has incited hatred against the country's Hindu majority.

He sought $ 85,000 in damages, but the claim was thrown out last month after a three - week trial, with Supreme Court Justice Kenneth Martin ruling in Mr Baxter's favour.

A New Jersey Superior Court Judge ruled Thursday that fraud claims against New York Giants quarterback Eli Manning in a memorabilia civil case will still go to trial.

Harry meanwhile, having triumphantly routed the prosecution at his trial, inexplicably failing to substitute the struggling centre back William Gallas against Chelsea at Wembley seeing Spurs slip away in the concluding games of the season, architect of those superb displays against Milan in the European Cup, he remains as a supreme wheeler dealer, much though he hates the description, immensely wiser, shrewder and more worldly wise than he ever claimed to be in court, I feel he would always be happier at club level.

Citing disagreements on the law that have emerged in different federal appeals courts, Silver claims that at trial, U.S. District Judge Valerie Caproni applied the wrong standards to money laundering, bribery and extortion charges.

State of New York Court of Appeals Supreme Court, Appellate Division Supreme Courts (Trial Courts) County Courts Family Courts Surrogates» Courts Court of Claims District Courts New York City Civil Court New York City Criminal Courts New York City Courts Problem Solving Courts Town and Village Courts Judicial selection in New York

After initially planning to testify in a Manhattan federal court trial in which he's accused of pocketing $ 22,000 in bribes, the Bronx pol changed his playbook on Friday by opting to remain mum, claiming he was wrongfully under the impression that he was required by law to take the witness stand as a defendant.

Three former MPs seeking to avoid a criminal trial over their expenses claims have received a setback - but still been allowed to appeal to the supreme court.

The Judge had said that he was baffled with the claim of any further investigation of Dasuki by DSS because the same DSS had filed before the court affidavit evidence that they have completed investigations on Dasuki and ready for his trial.

However, trial Justice Okon Abang turned down the request, insisting that the former PDP spokesman failed to persuade the court that he was indeed suffering from a life - threatening ailment as he claimed.

«The issue before the trial court was whether the 1st respondent (PDP) can rubbish the judgment / order of the court for whatever reason and set up a caretaker committee, other claims notwithstanding.

As it stands, it is clear that the court below premised its decision on this issue on a wrong appreciation of the claim of the appellants before the trial Federal High Ccourt below premised its decision on this issue on a wrong appreciation of the claim of the appellants before the trial Federal High CourtCourt.

The Missouri Supreme Court «agreed with the trial court's decision to dismiss several counts (including partisan gerrymandering claims), but remanded for a determination of whether the congressional districts (particularly districts 3 and 5) were sufficiently compact under state constitutional law.&rCourt «agreed with the trial court's decision to dismiss several counts (including partisan gerrymandering claims), but remanded for a determination of whether the congressional districts (particularly districts 3 and 5) were sufficiently compact under state constitutional law.&rcourt's decision to dismiss several counts (including partisan gerrymandering claims), but remanded for a determination of whether the congressional districts (particularly districts 3 and 5) were sufficiently compact under state constitutional law.»

On February 3, 2012, the trial court again rejected the plaintiff's compactness claims, and the Missouri Supreme Court affirmed that decision on May 25, court again rejected the plaintiff's compactness claims, and the Missouri Supreme Court affirmed that decision on May 25, Court affirmed that decision on May 25, 2012.

The trial of a former Chief of Defence Staff, CDS, Air Chief Marshal Alex S. Badeh, continued on Tuesday, June 28, 2016 before Justice Okon Abang of the Federal High Court sitting in Maitama, Abuja with the prosecution witness, Mustapha Yerima, further stating how he was pressured by the defendants to claim the property allegedly acquired with the proceeds of crime.

Three former Labour MPs and a peer seeking to avoid facing a criminal trial over their expenses claims will have their parliamentary privilege defence tested by the high court today.

The Manhattan federal court jury returned the verdict after a three - week trial in which prosecutors claimed that the 71 - year - old Democrat repeatedly promised the favors to enrich himself.

When Manhattan's federal appeals court vacated Silver's corruption conviction last week, it left open the door to a new trial by unanimously rejecting Silver's claim that the feds didn't present enough evidence to prove he took «pay - to - play» kickbacks.

Justice Kolawole had on March 21, 2017 stopped the trial of the defendants in the case when the EFCC in a press statement quoted the court proceedings upside with claims that the defendants were indicted for N36B contract fraud and put on trial before the court.

Court transcripts show that Cuomo's claim is false, and that his name was, in fact, spoken 54 times during the first four - day week of the trial, according to Syracuse.com.

The MP, who was due to stand trial at Southwark crown court, today changed his plea to guilty, admitting three charges of false accounting relating to claims for repairs, utility bills, council tax and house maintenance between 2005 and 2008.

THE PARTIES WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO LITIGATE SUCH CONTROVERSIES, DISPUTES, OR CLAIMS IN A COURT OF LAW, AND WAIVE THE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY.

«My year of hell after white van man claimed I exposed myself in lay by» — Throughout the two - day trial at Cambridge Crown Court, the 63 - year - old claimed he stopped Free Brampton Dating Sites Enjoy Dating in Cumbria with Cumbria Singles.

«My year of hell after white van man claimed I exposed myself in lay by» — Throughout the two - day trial at Cambridge Crown Court, the 63 - year - old claimed he stopped at a lay - by on Read More...

Set in Beirut, the story is about a young boy called Zain who, while on trial for a stabbing, claims in court that he wants to sue his parents for the miserable life they have given him.

A trial court upheld the adequacy of South Carolina's K — 12 education system, approving only a claim related to pre-K programs.

In the latest trial in Wyoming, the court rejected the most significant of plaintiffs» claims, granting them relatively minor relief.

The appellate court agreed with the trial court's May 2016 opinion finding that Florida's system of free public schools satisfies constitutional requirements, and opined that plaintiffs» claims «either raise political questions not subject to judicial review or were correctly rejected on the merits.»

In a 2010 pretrial ruling, the Connecticut Supreme Court affirmed the State's constitutional obligation and remanded the case back to the trial court for full trial on the merits of Plaintiffs» adequacy and equity clCourt affirmed the State's constitutional obligation and remanded the case back to the trial court for full trial on the merits of Plaintiffs» adequacy and equity clcourt for full trial on the merits of Plaintiffs» adequacy and equity claims.

If for any reason a claim proceeds in court rather than in arbitration you and we each waive any right to a jury trial.

- IF FOR ANY REASON A CLAIM PROCEEDS IN COURT, RATHER THAN IN ARBITRATION, YOU AND WE EACH WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL.

Barnes & Noble didn't make it to court with that claim, an ITC judge has seemingly thrown those claims out before an evidentiary trial even started.

In addition, at any time you or we may ask an appropriate court to compel arbitration of Claims, or to stay the litigation of Claims pending arbitration, even if such Claims are part of a lawsuit, unless a trial has begun or a final judgment has been entered.

To the fullest extent permitted by law, by your access to the Sites, you agree that: (i) any claim, dispute or cause of action regarding the Sites or these Terms shall be brought individually (NOT AS PART OF A CLASS ACTION) in the federal or state courts of the State of New York, and, such claim / dispute / cause of action will be resolved by a judge and THE RIGHT TO A JURY TRIAL IS HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVED; (ii) you consent to the personal jurisdiction of such courts as the exclusive tribunal for adjudication of any such claim / dispute / cause of action, expressly waiving any right of forum non convenience, change of venue or like right; (iii) your recovery will be limited to actual out - of - pocket costs involved in specifically accessing the Sites (if any) and you expressly waive your right to all other forms of recovery, including by way of example only, punitive, consequential, indirect, incidental, special and exemplary damages as well as attorneys» fees for bringing such claim / dispute / cause of action; and (iv) the court shall apply the law of the State of New York in adjudicating any such claim / dispute / cause of action, except for the choice of law / conflict of law rules of the State of New York (or of any other jurisdiction which would result in the application of the law of any jurisdiction other than the State of New York).

Barking Hound Village asked the trial court to dismiss the suit, claiming the dog's life was worth only «market value» or purchase price, which, as a mixed breed, amounted to nothing.

In a court trial that ended last Tuesday and found him not guilty as he had «no idea of the true consequences of his deeds», Jan H. claimed he suffered a psychosis when he infiltrated the hospital's basement.

If an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court were to fail, the Norton Simon Museum would still have at least one more legal card to play in its bid to get Von Saher's claim thrown out without a trial.