Sentences with phrase «claims experience more»

Not exact matches

I wasn't sure if the new «butterfly» mechanism, which claims to make the keyboard more stable, was going to provide for a smooth typing experience.

A recent study claims that snapping pictures actually helps us enjoy experiences more.

Some twins claim that they really can read each others» minds, but far more often, you'll find a twin who has at least experienced «twintuition.»

UBER benefitted by taking advantage of the unique circumstances in the cab industry and Manjoo claims that there are virtually no other major industries where those same characteristics apply — crappy customer experience; high, regulator - protected prices; monopolistic markets; huge numbers of daily users; lack of viable alternatives — ergo no more UBERs.

The move will help HootSuite offer more analysis to its high - paying enterprise clients — HootSuite claims these include 75 % of Fortune 1000 companies — as uberVu has experience offering insight to over 200 clients, including a few big names like NBC, 3M and Heinz.

The Briscoe Law Firm, PLLC is a full service business litigation and shareholder rights advocacy firm with more than 20 years of experience in complex litigation matters, including claims of investor and stockholder fraud, shareholder derivative suits, and securities class actions.

Spin Master claims to be still experiencing 15 % year - to - year growth, but has now gone through two rounds of layoffs, and is rumored to have slashed its workforce by more than 20 %.

For Google, it's a win - win — they can claim a more relevant experience for searchers and a higher ROI for advertisers — a better product overall for everyone.

In some cases this appeal to inner intuition might take the form of the claim that each of us has a «non-sensuous experience of the self» which is «both prior to our interpretation of our sense - knowledge and more important as source for the more fundamental questions of the meaning of our human experience as human selves» (BRO 75).

I'm not necessarily claiming that Christianity is wonderful (I'm an atheist), but that Christianity as it is known and experienced today is much, much more mellow an ideology both in theory and practice than Islam.

Given that people can be deluded or more often, allow their desire to believe something destroy their objectivity to the point their conclusions aren't reliable, your claims about private, personal experiences no one outside your head can verify simply aren't enough for anyone but you.

This, of course, is not to say he is not rightly esteemed truly human, a man of flesh and blood with the peculiar Biblical force of that phrase; indeed it might be claimed that the very stress laid on the limited character of his experience makes us more vividly aware of the reality of his human nature.

The more times you claim to know what someone you've never met has experienced, the dumber you look.

While any knowledge of God must indeed be conditioned by human experience, Ashbrook and Albright actually claim much more than this: that the brain not only patterns our experience of God, but its very structure can inform us of God's nature.

In more specific ways the spiritual influence of group involvement was also apparent: of the people currently involved, 90 percent claimed they were better able to forgive others, 79 percent said they had been enabled to share their faith with others outside the group, 78 percent felt closer to God and 66 percent had experienced answers to prayer.

Alison Inglis - Jones responds to the claim made Conservative candidate Dominic Raab that foodbank users are not experiencing poverty but short... More

But in my experience, the more vehemently anti-religious the atheist, the more like a religion, or at least like what these atheists claim a religion to be, is their atheism.

Such experiences themselves are evidence for the further claim that there are more subjective aesthetic reponses than those which can be called propositional feelings.

This reaction he claimed was more thrilling, more satisfying than the exciting experiences of courtship.»

But I would claim the opposite... that it takes far more rigor, and more than just intellectual, to finally see, know, and experience the oneness of all things and to promote this oneness in our fractured world that so many Christians and theologians would like to perpetuate.

If this intent is successfully realized, it will in part lend support to Hartshorne's claim that the dipolar conception of God is more compatible with religious experience than views which conceive God primarily in terms of the category of the absolute, or pure actuality, or being, etc..

Apple claims it's trying to present the best customer experience possible, but going forward, it should start by being a little more transparent.

Christine, I hear this claims quite often, but I have yet to hear anything even remotely convincing that these experiences are anything more than wishful thinking.

Our claim that we know God directly in experience can be made without presuming that this knowledge is easily had, or ever more than dimly possessed.

If the claim that God must somehow be experienced directly and universally already appears problematic, given the sheer fact of non - and even a-theistic religions and philosophies, how much more - problematic must it be when it becomes the claim that God is everywhere consciously known!

In fact, if Hartshorne's solution can be said to surpass theirs in its explicitly psychicalist claim that God is somehow experienced not only by every human being but by every actual entity whatever, theirs can be said to go beyond his in its more fully elaborated metaphysics of knowledge or cognitional theory.

RC; one more time, because of the history and archaeology I have researched as well as personal experience with the one who claims to be.

Running for president, both Pat Robertson and Joe Lieberman quoted, more or less accurately, George Washington's claim that «reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.»

First, he distinguishes from classical empiricism a revisionary description of experience according to which sense perception is neither the only nor even the primary mode of experience, but is rather derived from a still more elemental awareness both of ourselves and of the world around us» (PP 78).6 On Ogden's analysis, both the classical and this first type of revisionary empiricism «assume that the sole realities present in our experience, and therefore the only objects of our certain knowledge, are ourselves and the other creatures that constitute the world» (PP 79) 7 With these «two more conventional types of empiricism» he contrasts a «comprehensive» type of revisionary empiricism distinguished from them by its consideration of the possibility (and then also by its claim) that the internal awareness it asserts together with the former revisionary type is «the awareness not merely of ourselves, and of our fellow creatures, but also of the infinite whole in which we are all included as somehow one» (PP 87, 80, 85).

In other words, Ogden's analysis of various descriptions of experience is informed by two distinctions, both of which apply to the noetic pole of experience: a twofold distinction between nonsensuous and sensory modes of experience and a threefold distinction of what Whitehead calls «the feeling of the ego, the others, the totality,» that is, of self, other, and whole (PP 84).8 This comprehensive hermeneutical grid then permits an explanation of what he claims is a «sense of ourselves and others as of transcendent worth,» as precisely an «awareness of ourselves and the world as of worth to God» (PP 86f) Y Ogden notes that such an evidently theistic explanation is not open to empirical or experiential confirmation on either of the two more restrictive descriptions which, as he observes, must either «refer the word God» to some merely creaturely reality or process of interaction, or else., must deny it all reference whatever by construing its meaning as wholly noncognitive,» if they seek experiential illustration for such a sense at all (PP 80) 10

Why in this country do we seem to teach that having faith in god is more important then having knowledge and wisdom based on lived experience rather then stories based on 2000 year old morals and ethics???? Lets grow up and start living up to our const.ituation, or is that just another truthless notion to which people claim to live by?

On the contrary, I should claim, what I have been saying is metaphysical in the second sense of the word which I proposed in an earlier chapter; it is the making of wide generalizations on the basis of experience, with a reference back to verify or «check» the generalizations, a reference which includes not only the specific experience from which it started but also other experiences, both human and more general, by which its validity may be tested — and the result is not some grand scheme which claims to encompass everything in its sweep, but a vision of reality which to the one who sees in this way appears a satisfactory, but by no means complete, picture of how things actually and concretely go in the world.

The process - relational model of God as the most extensive exemplification of primordial creativity, with every worldly occasion in its own process of becoming; the process - relational concept of God as the principle of order channeling the world's becoming toward ever richer and more harmonious experience (the primordial nature); and the process - relational concept of God's preservation of every worldly occasion in God's own everlasting becoming (the consequent nature), with each such occasion evaluated and positioned for its greatest possible contribution to the divine life — these perspectives on divine reality which process - relational thought claims to find exemplified in the very nature of things are separately and together congruent with and supportive of the biblical images and events which describe the «already» in inaugurated eschatology.»

In fact, with Proudfoot's two - term option his own book begs for a more sophisticated approach — for while it denies realism in the name of a contemporary hermeneutics of suspicion, it claims to offer a realistic account of past scholarship on religious experience.

By faith however, I do seem to experience a kind of «certainty» or confidence but it is contingent on a whole matrix of relationships in progress and so while I can be passionate about the meaning I am making about those relationships, those relationships are always outstripping my meanings (claims) and revealing more about what meaning is possible.

Neville's claim that Platonism is supported by a religious intuition of the «irreducible dualism between Form and chaos» (CG 67) in reality is simply unconvincing; every metaphysics acknowledges the contrast between order and disorder, but there is no reason to think that that contrast — as experienced — is any more genuine or vivid for a Platonist than for an Aristotelian.

I also claim that my revision provides a more fruitful description of human experience.

In my experience (which is obviously limited, so take what I say as you will), women who are looking for companionship on a website that claims it will help you «Find God's match for you» are more likely to suspend their natural credulity with regard to their own safety, assuming that only those genuinely interested in a god - based relationship would be on such a site.

After a weekend of a lot of different claims, Monday came with a little more insight: The D.C. area isn't experiencing any more missing children than normal, they simply are starting to utilize social media to share missing children's pictures.

bill and sam and friends need to listen or read more and learn that they too can open their hearts and realize God will help them as they evidently do not believe the experiences of people who have been helped and that is not going to change anyone that will not keep on asking and keep on seeking to find the answers they claim to want.

DE: Whitehead called his view a radical empiricism because it claimed to be more radical than sense - data empiricism, as going back to a more primitive kind of experience.

And last but not least, Suchocki expressly states that God's consequent nature is not prehended, while Whitehead not only claims in the last page of Process and Reality that «the perfected actuality passes back into the temporal world, and qualifies this world so that each temporal actuality includes it as an immediate fact of relevant experience» (PR 351), but also speaks in more exact language of» [t] he objective immortality of his [God's] consequent nature» (PR 32).

Camping, a degreed engineer (not a pastor) who claims to have made the Bible his «university» for more than 50 years, has experience with failed prophecies.

She had years of knowledge and experience on the subject, and she had needed it all, especially with Alex. Her latest problem child had been questioned more than once about a string of rapes in New York City, a brutal series of crimes where the perpetrator gained the confidence of his targets — and intimidated them — by claiming he was a middleweight contender, then employed drugs to subdue his victims and had his way.

It was Great Britain's first medal of the regatta and Broughton claims she enjoyed the experience, already planning to race more K1 1000m events in the future.

Chelsea boss Antonio Conte has claimed he has a tougher job and has experienced a more difficult season compared to Burnley coach Sean Dyche, saying his colleague manager's job at the Turf Moor is «more simple».

The acquisition of Danish goalkeeper Anders Lindegaard, 26, is likely to be followed by the arrival of a more experienced replacement for Van der Sar, while teenagers Paul Pogba and Ravel Morrison can expect to be given opportunities to press their claims in the Carling Cup next season.

Claiming that this did not happen or that we «did it wrong» is no more fair than it is to claim that all kids who have experienced CIO must be traumatized, even if you can't see it.

For one it's stupid costly to rent car seats, in my experience rental places want upwards of $ 15 / day or more to rent a single car seat (I have been quoted $ 25 a day) after a few days you can exceed the cost of simply purchasing new... Meaning you could have purchased a brand new in the box car seat and checked that at the luggage counter complete with all it's factory packing that should allow it to arrive undamaged and you now have a backup or travel car seat complete with packaging... Second you have no idea about the condition of that rented car seat, as you imply, unseen damage is well unseen regardless of claims of «inspection» by the rental company, there is no way they can't tell if it's damaged if the damage is unseen, they are only doing visual checks nothing more... In the end there is nothing to assure you that your «rented» car seat will be in any better condition then one you brought with you or that it wasn't in an unreported «accident» from the previous renters or mishandled by the previous renters... If safety is you end goal, renting a car seat at your destination is not inline with that goal...

Since it is difficult to reconcile lactivists» claims with the life experience of these women, it follows that many conclude that the lactivist's claims are false and nothing more than scare tactics.