McIntosh's charges come amid growing
claims from school choice critics that charters — publicly - funded schools with broad flexibility in their curriculum and staffing — may «cherrypick» or intentionally exclude some high - needs students, serving decidedly fewer low - income children and children with disabilities, populations that also tend to trail their peers academically.
Not exact matches
His investigation continues, and he expects more
claims to be brought against other food service providers over rebates that not only create «an inherent conflict of interest» in the
choice of foods children are served at
school, but also discourage the use of locally produced goods
from smaller suppliers, including local farmers.
For those interested in private
school choice, two political advantages are
claimed: 1) High - regulation addresses some objections, winning votes among skeptics to improve the political prospects of passing and sustaining those programs; 2) High - regulation protects private
school choice programs
from the political damage caused by scandals and embarrassing outcomes.
The evidence
from developing countries might challenge the
claim, made by
school choice opponents, that the poor in America can not make sensible and informed
choices if
school choice is offered to them.
It was, according to the paper's summary, an «article on
school -
choice movement; competition
from charter
schools, publicly - financed free schools, is forcing other public schools to sell selves aggressively and forcing parents to evaluate claims; competition for Jersey City, NJ, students between public schools and new charter school planned by for - profit Advantage Schools Inc described.
schools, publicly - financed free
schools, is forcing other public schools to sell selves aggressively and forcing parents to evaluate claims; competition for Jersey City, NJ, students between public schools and new charter school planned by for - profit Advantage Schools Inc described.
schools, is forcing other public
schools to sell selves aggressively and forcing parents to evaluate claims; competition for Jersey City, NJ, students between public schools and new charter school planned by for - profit Advantage Schools Inc described.
schools to sell selves aggressively and forcing parents to evaluate
claims; competition for Jersey City, NJ, students between public
schools and new charter school planned by for - profit Advantage Schools Inc described.
schools and new charter
school planned by for - profit Advantage
Schools Inc described.
Schools Inc described.»
The news comes as conservative members
from within Morgan's own party highlighted doubts about the government's plans,
claiming there was lacking
choice for most
schools and that rural
schools could be compromised.
Furthermore, the
claim that private
school choice and charter
schools «siphon» resources
from public
schools is one education myth that just won't die.
But the authors, not wanting to be caught out there,
claim that these private
school practices - such as discouraging families that would hate the
school from applying and treating
choice as a two - way street that lets the
school tell parents what's necessary for their kids to succeed - are illegitimate for publicly funded
schools.
However, new research
from two PhD students at the University of Arkansas shows that Louisiana's
school choice program improves racial integration, further undermining the DOJ's
claims to the contrary.
The House of Lords social mobility committee has published a report
claiming that scrapping the national curriculum for pupils over 14 and taking careers advice away
from schools could help young people make better
choices about their future.
Statewide programs in Florida, Louisiana, and Ohio, however, already have demonstrated clear positive effects on the achievement of students who remain in public
schools, confirming Caroline Hoxby's
claim (see «Rising Tide,» features, Winter 2001) that competition
from choice generates «a rising tide that lifts all boats.»
This puts the lie to the oft - repeated
claim of critics like National Education Association president Bob Chase that
school choice is «siphoning money
from the communities and public
schools that need it the most.»
Combatants on both sides of that fight could
claim a measure of validation
from the new research: Advocates of
school choice who argue that it isn't fair to judge voucher programs based on test results
from a student's first year in private
school, given that it takes children time to adjust to a new environment, and critics who say vouchers drain funds
from public
schools without improving student achievement.
The new lawsuit challenging the Arizona Empowerment Scholarship Account program
claims the program violates the same constitutional provisions used to strike down the previous voucher programs — specifically, that they don't offer
choice beyond a private
school option — but Empowerment Accounts differ
from these earlier programs in important and constitutionally relevant ways.
DeVos also tried in her interview to
claim that «studies show» positive results
from school choice in Florida, but as Mark Webber points out, those studies show positive results — just really, really small ones in the tenths of a standard deviation.
Opponents of
school choice frequently
claim that vouchers and scholarship tax credits «siphon» money
from public
schools and increase the overall cost of education to the taxpayers.
They
claim the United States should therefore learn
from other countries» experiences and refuse to adopt
school choice.
To some, it's an unverified
claim that emerged
from school choice advocacy groups like Parents for Educational Freedom during recent legislative sessions.
The complaint
claims choice schools like Messmer, in flagging the limits of their responsibility to accommodate disabled students, are «discouraging or dissuading families of children with disabilities
from even seeking to enroll.»
Despite the criticism Lake Forest Charter
School has received over the years for being one of the few public schools with selective enrollment, it isn't stopping New Orleans» parents from trying to claim a stake in the city's school choice
School has received over the years for being one of the few public
schools with selective enrollment, it isn't stopping New Orleans» parents
from trying to
claim a stake in the city's
school choice
school choice melee.