Sentences with phrase «claims history with»

Maintain a good credit history, only file insurance claims when they're absolutely necessary (insurance companies do keep track and share your claims history with a national database), and take advantage of discounts such as good student discounts, good driver discounts, and discounts for consumers who double up on home and auto insurance with a single provider, or life insurance and homeowners insurance just to name a few examples.

It may also include transaction information, such as your premium payment or claims history with us.

Examples include your policy's account balance, your premium payment history, and your claims history with us; and

It includes your driving record, claims history with other insurers, and credit report information.

Remember that the policyholder tarnishes their claim history with each one they file, including claims filed by anyone else listed on the policy.

Remember that the policyholder tarnishes their claim history with each one they file, including claims filed by anyone else listed on the policy.

If you prefer to limit sharing information such as your driving record, claim history with other companies, and credit information, call your State Farm agent or 800-865-6035.

Not exact matches

They claim Nokia needs a «product obsessive» like Steve Jobs, not someone with Elop's bumpy career history.

Ho is claiming responsibility for the split, saying in a statement: «Despite our positive history with Crown, I made the strategic decision to terminate the joint venture arrangement and allow Melco to pursue Japan alone.

The Wall pulls together dozens of streams of customer data to let reps see customers» history, their conversations with the company, any claims filed and paid, and their various policies — all on a simple timeline.

«There is a long and sordid history of people coming out of the woodwork with bogus claims when huge amounts of money are on the line,» Altman wrote.

Asana claims to be one of the fastest - growing software - as - a-service companies in history, with more than 140,000 customers.)

There is a long and sordid history of people coming out of the woodwork with bogus claims when huge amounts of money are on the line.

For sure, Mr. Moore would be on surer footing here if the Conservative Party of Canada hadn't pleaded guilty to violating election spending limits in 2008 and if the Harper government wasn't the only government in this country's history to have been found in contempt of Parliament and if the RCMP wasn't said to be presently investigating Mr. Harper's former chief of staff and and if two Conservative MPs weren't presently in court with Elections Canada and if the Prime Minister hadn't left for Peru without facing the House on the first day that Parliament was in session after the deal between Mr. Wright and Mr. Duffy was revealed and if the Prime Minister hadn't fail to show up in the House on the following Monday and if Mr. Duffy hadn't remained a Conservative senator for awhile despite having apparently claimed a housing allowance he shouldn't have.

Later Ivory was further energized with a new claim «99and 44/100 percent pure» creating one of the most recognized slogans in advertising history.

For those who are unfamiliar with them, spousal benefits allow you to use your spouse's earnings history rather than your own to claim Social Security benefits.

If their robot executes trades with the kind of profit the site claims, then why would the people behind it want to hide that fact by providing no trade history at all?

In his Natural History of Religion (1757), the Scottish philosopher David Hume — in agreement with other skeptical and agnostic English and French thinkers — said that Christianity's claim to absolute truth was to be blamed for the devastating civil wars that had taken place in Britain and France.

Thus any claim about the Protestant tradition not holding to the continuation of the gifts must reckon with this part of the history.

And those who claim religion to be a farce have all but discounted history and man's connection with the divine.

Honestly, I think when people attack it, it has more to do with the claim it comes from god and how absurd that claims seems given the writing and its overall history.

you make claims with no history or facts to back them up then claim you come from religion that's open to questioning won't name it or answer questions

It's concession by rewriting history, claiming no conflict with science by denying that the exposed belief was never literal / relevant / real.

Even in my early statements I emphasized that revelational history is always connected with language, and I tried to relate it to the ultimacy of the meaning claimed for a revelational event.

No one in the history of the planet has come forth with any evidence to support the claim that any type of a god or gods exist.

When I claim that label, I'm connecting not only with a number of active feminists who are working today to help women, but with an ongoing history of feminists who got women the vote, who made birth control happen, who got women into positions of power in the government, who worked to rectify racial inequality and fight against things like mandatory sterilization of welfare recipients.

Apocalyptic thought provokes resistance, because it fuses an alternative vision of history's telos with warfare and final judgment, all within the context of a prophetic claim to have removed the veil that keeps humans from truly perceiving the world.

Many writers insist on the need for every discipline and discourse to have an explicitly theological framework; many make broad claims, confident generalizations covering long periods of history and whole disciplines, and fairly summary dismissals of periods and categories of thinkers with whom they differ.

Many of the authors take seriously Francis Fukuyama's claim that, with the elimination of communism as a social and political possibility, human history has reached a sort of terminus.

To say there is no evidence for the real existence of the most discussed figure in history denies the unique manner in which Christianity came about (a claim that God came in the flesh conveyed with real life details, etc).

The New Testament claims that this Jesus of history, whose father and mother were well known to his contemporaries (John 6:42) is at the same time the pre-existent Son of God, and side by side with the historical event of the crucifixion it sets the definitely non-historical event of the resurrection.

And for the Christian faith, the claim to be made is that the moment of greatest intensity is the emergence in the sphere of history and of human life of the person of Jesus Christ, with all that he was and all that he continues to be, all that he did and all that he continues to do, all that he meant and all that he continues to mean for those who respond to him in heart's surrender.

After studying the hebrew content of Psalm 51:5 and then reckoning the Jewish history of David mother and her estranged relationship with his father, a person would have to be intentionally deluded and have a carnal mind to claim that David was born with sin, and especially so to claim that he was born with the sin of Adam.

This, he claims, is in accordance with the Scriptures, which declare that only at the end of history is the deity of God unquestionably open to all - an event.

12 In other words, an adequate trinitarian theology can not develop a notion of God's actions in history that is incompatible with its claims about God's own eternal nature.

Oh, and along with your conjecture and claims, I appreciate your selective history when you spoke of Corpernicus and Galileo.

For those who claim that non-belief in a higher being is correlated with higher intelligence need to dig into the history books a little more where you will find most if not all great historical figures, inventors and «brilliant» minds (e.g. Socrates, Newton, Galileo, Einstein) believed in a higher being or through deductive / inductive reasoning eventually believed in a higher being (e.g. Einstein).

But Christ has given them a right to claim a history which goes back to the creation of the world and of the human race, and they know now that their history is the history of the new Israel which is connected with the old Israel in and through Christ» (Tribal Awakening, Reprint, p. 221).

So, without a government to help with enforcement, they revert back to Roman history, and claim to be victims.

Sure, David goes on to say that he was uneasy with such a claim and wasn't even sure that it was true, but still... how do you write a book which is supposed to be about taking back your faith from the American Dream and start the book by stating that you are the youngest megachurch pastor in American history?

Yet he refuses to collapse biblical theology into the history of the religion of Israel, distinguishing the two this way: ««History of religion» is concerned with all the forms and aspects of all human religions, while theology tends to be concerned with the truth - claims of one religion and especially with its authoritative texts and traditions and their interpretations.history of the religion of Israel, distinguishing the two this way: ««History of religion» is concerned with all the forms and aspects of all human religions, while theology tends to be concerned with the truth - claims of one religion and especially with its authoritative texts and traditions and their interpretations.History of religion» is concerned with all the forms and aspects of all human religions, while theology tends to be concerned with the truth - claims of one religion and especially with its authoritative texts and traditions and their interpretations.»

Regrettably, this book might end up by persuading a reader who is not familiar with the history or literature that the enemies of anti-Semitism are infected by the same spirit of fanaticism and conspiracy - mongering that they claim to be combating.

His machine is just as much an abstraction as he claims the materialists» matter is: an arbitrary, idealized device with absolutely identical interchangeable parts, with no history and no determinate future, completely subject to adjustment and transformation by its human inventors and users.

The CCP stirs the nationalistic emotions of the people by contesting Japan over issues such as: the disputed territorial claims with China: its writing of history that omits Japanese atrocities in its invasion of China, and in recent visits by its leaders to Japan's Yasukuni shrine which honors national heroes including convicted war criminals.2

What the rationalist, with his particular philosophy, could not accept was the claim inherent in traditional Christian exegesis that there is a privileged knowledge about the meaning of history that comes from the transcendent God himself.

However, when discussing the uniqueness of Jesus Christ, Wheeler maintains that whether «Jesus Christ's divine - human unity is the sole member of its class, as evangelical Christians would typically claim,» or is «a paradigmatic member of a class with multiple members» as Whiteheadians contend, this crucial unity can be construed more fundamentally by those in both groups as an example of a systemic change of the God - world relationship happening once in the history of humanity globally (105).

My humble advise to you is to go and study the history that how, when and who wrote these chapters and what type of time it went through and then say that if there is any statement in this book is the real time statements of Jesus PBUH... please be honest with yourself... and don't do anything to please others but only you... and make sure you are convince with this study... whats the difference btwn what is in this book and what was written in a book last year when a Hindu claim himself as God and millions believed in him and still they believe even after his death by being ill... no one asks if I take a human as my God then how could he be ill or eventually be dead?

It moves glacierlike through human history, carrying with it the debris of outworn values and stubbornly trying to break through everything in its path by the sheer weight of its dogmatic claim.

The Renaissance claim that man is a creature with an unlimited potential is an essential truth about life and history.

We are so quick to point out the obvious lies about Jews and Israel that come out in Egypt — the Sinai Governors claims that the Mossad released a shark into the Red Sea to kill Egyptians, or, as I once read in a newspaper whilst on holiday in Cairo, the tale of the magnetic belt buckles that Jews were selling cheap in Egypt that would sterilize men on contact — yet we so rarely examine our own misconceptions about the nature of our history with the Egyptian nation.