Sentences with phrase «claims in a court of»

THE PARTIES WAIVE ANY RIGHT TO LITIGATE SUCH CONTROVERSIES, DISPUTES, OR CLAIMS IN A COURT OF LAW, AND WAIVE THE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY.

The inventor usually knows this and will take a moment before bringing a costly suit against a worthy competitor who would be able to show the invalidity of the claim in the court of law.

For more information on filing a claim in the Court of Common Pleas, visit the Franklin County Clerk of Court's webpage.

In addition to pressing criminal charges, the victims of drunk driving accidents and their families have the legal right to pursue claims in a court of law in order to recover monetary damages.

As embassies are sovereign territories employees should press any claims in the courts of the relevant country.

Filing a personal injury or wrongful death claim in a court of law can enable accident victims to hold distracted drivers accountable for the damage they cause, and in many cases can also help them obtain financial compensation for their injuries, medical bills, lost income and other harms they have suffered as a result of the accident.

The Crown claimed in the Court of Queen's Bench that on the coming into force of the Constitution Act 1867 as amended by the Manitoba Act 1870, that the inhabitants of Manitoba other than Indians, became Canadian citizens.

Not exact matches

In a court ruling authorizing the arrests, Brazilian federal judge André Duszczak said «Faria and other BRF officers sought to cover up claims of possible food contamination, as shown in certain laboratory tests, made by a former employee in a labor lawsuit.&raquIn a court ruling authorizing the arrests, Brazilian federal judge André Duszczak said «Faria and other BRF officers sought to cover up claims of possible food contamination, as shown in certain laboratory tests, made by a former employee in a labor lawsuit.&raquin certain laboratory tests, made by a former employee in a labor lawsuit.&raquin a labor lawsuit.»

Google also has a high - stakes courtroom battle on its docket, following an appeals court decision last month reviving Oracle's copyright claim against Google's use of the Java language in Android's operating system.

The SEC will litigate its claims against Balwani in federal district court in the Northern District of California.

According to court documents, Jones claims to have lost millions on its investment in the Rachel Roy IP Co., which then consisted of the designer label, RR, and RACHEL Rachel Roy, a lower - priced line, exclusively available at Macy's.

ABC 13 posted court documents which showed that the pair claimed investors could receive a return of 15 times their initial investment in just 30 days.

A woman named Colleen Gallagher, represented by the same law firm, is also a plaintiff in a 2014 lawsuit in the same court alleging that Bayer AG's claims about the health benefits of its One A Day multivitamins misled consumers.

The suits by the American Civil Liberties Union and the Human Rights Campaign, filed in federal courts in Baltimore and Seattle, claim Trump's plan violates the Equal Protection clause of the Constitution.

Collector Steven Tananbaum sued in New York state court on Thursday over the non-delivery of three Koons sculptures, claiming a «well - oiled machine» that exploits collectors» desire to own the artists» works by using incoming money to pay debts.

The court majority placed a significant barrier in front of employees claiming harassment or discrimination in the future.

Subject to the arbitration provisions above, and other than small claims actions as permitted therein, any action or proceeding arising from, relating to or in connection with these Terms of Service will be brought exclusively in the federal or state courts located in New York, New York, and you irrevocably consent to the personal jurisdiction of such courts and agree that it is a convenient forum and that you will not seek to transfer such action or proceeding to any other forum or jurisdiction, under the doctrine of forum non conveniens or otherwise.

The Arbitrator, and not any federal, state or local court or agency, shall have the exclusive authority to resolve any dispute arising under or relating to the validity, interpretation, applicability, enforceability or formation of these Terms of Service and / or these arbitration provisions in Section 26 hereof, including but not limited to any claim that all or any part of these Terms of Service is void or voidable;

The following year, Monaco filed suit against the State of Mississippi in the U.S. Supreme Court, but the high court refused to hear Monaco's claim on the grounds that the «Court has no jurisdiction of a suit brought by a foreign state against a state of the Union without her consent.&rCourt, but the high court refused to hear Monaco's claim on the grounds that the «Court has no jurisdiction of a suit brought by a foreign state against a state of the Union without her consent.&rcourt refused to hear Monaco's claim on the grounds that the «Court has no jurisdiction of a suit brought by a foreign state against a state of the Union without her consent.&rCourt has no jurisdiction of a suit brought by a foreign state against a state of the Union without her consent.»

In addition, courts (though not human - rights tribunals) are raising the burden of proof for mental injury, which will likely limit the number of claims.

Emails anonymously provided to Chevron may show a «conspiracy against Chevron,» the oil giant claims, as well as leaks of confidential court materials to high - level Ecuadorian government officials in violation of court orders

The DOJ similarly claimed in its filing to the US Court of Appeals that the listed countries had «a previously identified link to an increased risk of terrorist activity.»

The next day that firm filed two lawsuits against Diageo, one in federal court, raising a suite of traditional trademark and unfair business practices claims, but the other in New York State Supreme Court, seeking a permanent injunction under a seldom - used statute available only to charitable organizations, known as Section 135 of the New York General Businesscourt, raising a suite of traditional trademark and unfair business practices claims, but the other in New York State Supreme Court, seeking a permanent injunction under a seldom - used statute available only to charitable organizations, known as Section 135 of the New York General BusinessCourt, seeking a permanent injunction under a seldom - used statute available only to charitable organizations, known as Section 135 of the New York General Business Law.

So I look forward to reading this to opposing counsel at the next deposition where I can tell them that I'm not afraid of appearing in court and I'm not intimidated into frivolous claims in search of shake - down money.

«Many of these types of claims are designed to simply get a payout from an employer who did not want to get bound up in the expense of a court case».

In a suit filed in a US Federal Claims court on July 15, Bitmanagement alleges that the US Navy installed its 3D virtual reality software «BS Contact Geo» onto «hundreds of thousands» of computers without permission from the company and without obtaining the appropriate licenseIn a suit filed in a US Federal Claims court on July 15, Bitmanagement alleges that the US Navy installed its 3D virtual reality software «BS Contact Geo» onto «hundreds of thousands» of computers without permission from the company and without obtaining the appropriate licensein a US Federal Claims court on July 15, Bitmanagement alleges that the US Navy installed its 3D virtual reality software «BS Contact Geo» onto «hundreds of thousands» of computers without permission from the company and without obtaining the appropriate licenses.

«This case has already been dismissed with prejudice by the court that heard it, which ruled in Yelp's favor and also found the claims not to be supported by credible evidence,» Vince Sollitto, Yelp's vice president of communications said.

A U.S. appeals court ruled on Tuesday that record companies and music publishers that once formed part of EMI Group could pursue additional copyright infringement claims in a long - running lawsuit over defunct online music storage firm MP3tunes.

None of Spin Master's claims has been proved in court.

But a US Circuit Court of Appeals judge just threw out the verdict — He was to be sent to jail for 21 months and pay $ 15 million in fines — vindicating Reyes consistent claim of innocence.

Ahead of the visit, he has done much to win Beijing's favor, including rebuffing the US over joint military exercises, downplaying an international - court ruling that rejected China's claims in the South China Sea, and criticizing US leadership.

His rapid pace of nominations and confirmations have outpaced predecessors, and, in September, he hit 65 combined nominations between appeals courts, district courts, the US Tax Court, and the US Court of Federal Claims.

One of the most common reasons a court will toss a non-compete claims is when the employee did not receive consideration; a non-compete agreement is a contract, and contracts require the exchange of consideration in order to be valid.

«MoFo's policies and practices are emblematic of the «old boys» club» that permeates law firms, suppresses female advancement, and stereotypes women,» claims the lawsuit, which was filed in U.S District Court in San Francisco.

Officially, China's Supreme People's Court claims the number of executions has dropped by half since the court resumed reviewing death sentences in Court claims the number of executions has dropped by half since the court resumed reviewing death sentences in court resumed reviewing death sentences in 2006.

In his 19 - page order, Carver County Judge Kevin Eide appeared to accept those six claims, stating, «The court is not aware of any objection or dispute with the statement that these persons are the siblings or half - siblings» of Prince.

Although Impark threatens to sue deadbeats, it rarely does; the costs of bringing actions in small - claims court don't justify the rewards.

«Requiring the banks to pay treble damages to every plaintiff who ended up on the wrong side of an independent Libor ‐ denominated derivative swap would, if appellants» allegations were proved at trial, not only bankrupt 16 of the world's most important financial institutions, but also vastly extend the potential scope of antitrust liability in myriad markets where derivative instruments have proliferated,» the U.S. Court of Appeals in New York said in the ruling.A U.S. appeals court on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigCourt of Appeals in New York said in the ruling.A U.S. appeals court on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigcourt on Monday revived private antitrust litigation accusing major banks of conspiring to manipulate the Libor benchmark interest rate, in a big setback for their defense against investors» claims of market - rigging.

The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan reversed a lower court judge's dismissal of investors» antitrust claims against 16 banks, including Deutsche Bank AG, UBS AG, Bank of America (bac) and J.P. Morgan because she found no showing of anticompetitive Court of Appeals in Manhattan reversed a lower court judge's dismissal of investors» antitrust claims against 16 banks, including Deutsche Bank AG, UBS AG, Bank of America (bac) and J.P. Morgan because she found no showing of anticompetitive court judge's dismissal of investors» antitrust claims against 16 banks, including Deutsche Bank AG, UBS AG, Bank of America (bac) and J.P. Morgan because she found no showing of anticompetitive harm.

«By requiring more precision in initial pleadings, the bill would allow courts and defendants to better assess the legitimacy of infringement claims,» notes the Internet Association, a group that supports the bill.

This news comes weeks after Waymo dismissed three of the four patent - infringement claims in the suit and a court decided to allow Uber to depose Alphabet CEO Larry Page as well as David Drummond, the company's chief legal officer and senior vice president of corporate development.

Walters claims he never had similar disputes in the past and an investigation of local court records backs him up.

In a complaint filed in San Francisco Superior Court March 12, the owner of a 17 - year - old San Francisco business called Renaissance Furniture Restoration claimed Yelp deleted his business's positive ratings after he declined to buy advertisinIn a complaint filed in San Francisco Superior Court March 12, the owner of a 17 - year - old San Francisco business called Renaissance Furniture Restoration claimed Yelp deleted his business's positive ratings after he declined to buy advertisinin San Francisco Superior Court March 12, the owner of a 17 - year - old San Francisco business called Renaissance Furniture Restoration claimed Yelp deleted his business's positive ratings after he declined to buy advertising.

By requiring more precision in initial pleadings, the bill would allow courts and defendants to better assess the legitimacy of infringement claims.

This time, Pomerantz established the right of individual foreign investors who purchased foreign - traded shares of a foreign corporation to pursue claims for securities fraud in a U.S. court, thereby overcoming obstacles created by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 readcourt, thereby overcoming obstacles created by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2010 readCourt's 2010 read more

For sure, Mr. Moore would be on surer footing here if the Conservative Party of Canada hadn't pleaded guilty to violating election spending limits in 2008 and if the Harper government wasn't the only government in this country's history to have been found in contempt of Parliament and if the RCMP wasn't said to be presently investigating Mr. Harper's former chief of staff and and if two Conservative MPs weren't presently in court with Elections Canada and if the Prime Minister hadn't left for Peru without facing the House on the first day that Parliament was in session after the deal between Mr. Wright and Mr. Duffy was revealed and if the Prime Minister hadn't fail to show up in the House on the following Monday and if Mr. Duffy hadn't remained a Conservative senator for awhile despite having apparently claimed a housing allowance he shouldn't have.

Contrary to what the plaintiffs in the case were claiming, there was no «flooding» of any sort, according to the solar industry association in response to the court ruling.

President Trump's lawyers claimed in court on Friday that Stephanie Clifford violated a confidentially agreement at least 20 times, exposing her to damages of at least $ 20 million.

To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided tclaims, damages, awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation, court costs, costs of settlement and costs of pursuing indemnification and insurance), of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided tClaims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused by, arise out of or are related to (a) your use or misuse of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation of these Terms, (e) your violation of the rights of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse of the Sites or Products provided to you.

In 1990, the Supreme Court of Canada had created a sophisticated legal test on workplace anti — discrimination claims, but, as the Court acknowledged in Tawney Meiorin's case, this test had proven to be complicated and challenging to usIn 1990, the Supreme Court of Canada had created a sophisticated legal test on workplace anti — discrimination claims, but, as the Court acknowledged in Tawney Meiorin's case, this test had proven to be complicated and challenging to usin Tawney Meiorin's case, this test had proven to be complicated and challenging to use.