I'd always wondered about the scientific validity of
claims made regarding «left and right brain thinking», «Gardiner's Multiple Intelligences» and «brain gym exercise».
Perhaps the biggest long - term study that sought to verify
the claims made regarding the effectiveness of the Mediterranean diet is the Prevención con Dieta Mediterránea (PREDIMED) Study.
Ensure that
any claims you make regarding your achievements, all dates, educational qualifications, etc. are accurate otherwise they might be challenged by someone who knows otherwise.
Not exact matches
No commitment was
made regarding equity, the company
claimed, and Bell was dismissed as the firm transitioned to a new line of business that she «put little effort» toward developing.
Advisers who presently are fiduciaries may be especially likely to fully satisfy the PTEs» Impartial Conduct Standards before January 1, 2018, in the ERISA - plan context, because advisers who
make recommendations to plans and plan participants
regarding plan assets, including recommendations on rollovers or distributions of plan assets, are already subject to standards of prudence and loyalty under ERISA and a violation of the Impartial Conduct Standards would be subject to
claims for civil liability under ERISA.
Daily Harvest
makes no
claim or representation
regarding, and accepts no responsibility for, the quality, content, nature or reliability of third party websites accessible by hyperlink from the Sites or of websites linking to the Sites.
We examine the role of identity
claims constructed in narratives by borrowers in influencing lender decision
making regarding unsecured personal loans.
The Home Buying Institute
makes no
claims or assertions
regarding future housing conditions.
When to
claim Social Security benefits will be one of the most important decisions that you
make regarding your retirement, along with how to take retirement income from your various retirement accounts and how you will fund your health care needs in retirement.
It's this laziness that is most frustrating, as if nothing interesting has happened over the last decade with
regard to central banks
making the same
claim.
State - run newspaper Global Times, commonly
regarded a Party mouthpiece, publishes an article in which it addresses
claims made by Western media outlets that «sex - related crimes are serious in China,» but that the country ««rarely» takes sexual assault allegations seriously.»
The Home Buying Institute
makes no
claims or assertions
regarding future real estate trends.
The Home Buying Institute
makes no
claims or assertions
regarding future real estate conditions.
The Home Buying Institute (HBI)
makes no
claims or assertions
regarding future housing conditions.
These things all pile up, piece by piece, bit by bit, and eventually when the total is looked at, it becomes quite clear that the Bible is almost entirely mythical, and certainly no guide to understanding the world objectively, and that any
claims made therein should be
regarded as apocryphal or just outright fiction.
Second: The Creation tale is simply a way for early humans to explain mans creation and «fall» from God's predetermined path... The old testament is full of stuff more related to philosophy and health advice then «Gods word» However, this revelation has not
made me less of a christian... In Contrast to those stuck in «the old ways»
regarding faith (not believing in neanderthals and championing the
claim that earth is only 6000 years old), I believe God created the universe on the very principle of physics and evolution (and other sciencey stuff)... Thus the first clash of atoms was the first step in the billionyear long recipe in creating the universe, the galaxies, the stars, the planets, life itself and us.
If you normally
claim that the «government» is not to be trusted and should not have a say in our personal lives, but then
claim that the «government» should be able to
make decisions
regarding pregnancy for women, then you must be a «Christian Conservative».
@fimeilleur actually i can back up the
claims i
make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point
regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.
There goes Theo, just like truthfollower,
making claims they can't support
regarding objective morality:
All of it can
make people happy, but I'm interested in what's actually real, and
claims about gods don't impress me much in that
regard.
But
regarding the creation story, it
makes specific factual
claims (albeit, internally contradictory when comparing the two different creation narratives)
regarding the order of creation which are directly contradicted by observable, physical evidence, e.g. earth before sun, the order of the appearance of particular forms of life, etc..
They have proven all the
claims that were
made by religious groups
regarding this was bogus and falsely reported.
To
make claims of knowledge
regarding actions and desires of your god without providing proof of existence is illogical and childlike.
If you continue to
make statements of fact
regarding your beliefs, I will be forced to demand supporting verifiable evidence for your
claims.
In prior posts, I refuted
claims made by you in Mr. Spencer video
regarding whether Mohammed (Peace and Blessings be upon him) and you conveniently ignored those refutations (even though you were insistent that I can't refute even one of those
claims).
Even Meiklejohn, who
makes no
claim to being a Christian, appreciates perfectly what the source of so many of our humane ideals is, and he is especially clear about this in
regard to the principles of education.
Madden says that «public debate predicated on the
claim that our opponents are just
making errors with
regard to their ultimate commitments... strikes me as a non-starter.»
Public debate predicated on the
claim that our opponents are just
making errors of reason with
regard to their ultimate commitments still strikes me as a non-starter.
To
make absolute
claims regarding such doctrinal statements gives too much weight to specific formulations of doctrine.
The burden of proof is on those who
make an affirmative
claim regarding the existence of some deity.
Once you get past that, then
claiming any advantage we have over animals might
make sense (in
regard to religion).
I
make no
claims for or against in that
regard.
for example, very similar «
claims» (for a supposed «lack» of evidence) were
made regarding the Hitti.tes, the pool of Bethesda, or even the city of Troy — only later to be rescinded once evidence was found.
It seems unlikely that Jesus» followers would ever have
regarded him as the Christ if he had not
made this
claim for himself during his brief ministry.
For the
claim implicit in any such analysis is that the interpretive concepts employed therein are not only sufficiently clear to
make possible their being
regarded as exclusive of each other, but also of adequate range of application to comprehend the relevant options.
While Barth freely
makes use of Kantian epistemological concepts, he is never dependent on them for his own theological epistemology, which is rooted not in secular axioms
regarding human reason but in theological
claims regarding the nature of God and divine action.
The
claim for dogmatic certitude is vigorously denied and his own philosophy declared to be inadequate (PR 343).2 Whitehead thus takes criticism for granted; indeed he
regards his philosophy as a success if it
makes a new kind of criticism possible (ESP 114) 3 He himself provides the criteria according to which his philosophy is to be evaluated.
Osthathios who noted that there is «a world of difference between Eastern Churches and the Western Churches as
regards historical criticism and the limitation it imposes on our basic dogmas like the Incarnation and the Holy Trinity,» and goes on to contend that such differences have become «almost unbridgeable,» nevertheless
claims that «Both East and West will agree that the aim of mission is to
make everyone do the will of God.»
You continue to
make the same
claims over and over and over and over and over without any
regard to the actual answers brought against you.
- the question
regarding the
claim made in BEM (IV.
You must prove that your god exists prior to
making claims of knowlege
regarding that gods actions, abilities and desires.
Without casting Enlightenment rationalism as categorically evil, Wright details some of the problematic consequences of Enlightenment assumptions
regarding the biblical text: false
claims to absolute objectivity, the elevation of «reason» («not as an insistence that exegesis must
make sense with an overall view of God and the wider world,» Wright notes, «but as a separate «source» in its own right»), reductive and skeptical readings of scripture that cast Christianity as out - of - date and irrelevant, a human - based eschatology that fosters a «we - know - better - now» attitude toward the text, a reframing of the problem of evil as a mere failure to be rational, the reduction of the act of God in Jesus Christ to a mere moral teacher, etc..
Hamburger
makes two implicit, related
claims: 1) we can know with relative certainty what early American Founders or dissenters intended
regarding church and state, and speak about those intentions as a coherent body of thought; and 2) continuing decisions about church - state relations ought to remain faithful to the intentions of those groups.
Though I was critical of James's and Niebuhr's understanding of Christianity — an account that Barth saw could not avoid turning Christian convictions into anthropology — I hoped it would be obvious that I
regard James's Will to Believe to be crucial for helping us understand how Christian theology can
make claims about the way things are.
I
made no
claim regarding modern capitalism's moral nature whatsoever; I said only that it has none, and that its apologists tend to praise the good it can accomplish and to ignore the evil that it often promotes.
Under the circumstances, how can any
claim be
made regarding what «truth» Job speaks, except that «dust and ashes» describes the mortal condition?
I
make no additional
claims regarding dietary concerns.
As we know, consumers are closely watching the
claims that brands are
making regarding fresh, natural and humanely sourced food.
(Sec. 204)
Claims made before enactment of this Act
regarding whether a product was produced with or without genetic engineering may continue to be
made for 36 months after enactment of this Act.
Reports in Chile emerged last week that Sanchez is keen on forcing his way out in the summer after yet another disappointing campaign with Arsenal, but the story from the Standard
claims that the player is yet to
make up his mind
regarding the issue.