Sentences with phrase «claims made without»

There are many bold claims made without any proof to back them up.

You said, «This is a another sweeping claim made without the slighest reason to believe it is true.

Not exact matches

The order bars Lumosity from making claims that its games improve cognitive performance or stave off cognitive decline without first collecting scientific evidence from randomized, blinded and independent trials.

The book shows «how we could cut emissions by up to 50 percent without asking people to make big sacrifices,» Gates says, and he even claims it's a relatively light read.

«We are disappointed by the fact that such serious claims have been made publicly, without any proof being presented and without any attempt by the United Kingdom to clarify the situation with the Russian side in the first place.»

Holmes and Theranos made waves in Silicon Valley and the diagnostics industry two years ago, when investors lined up to boost the valuation of a company that claimed it would soon offer more than 1,000 varieties of blood diagnostics tests without the need for a syringe.

«People are claiming that they can train away biases,» Greenwald says, «[They're] making those claims without evidence.»

You agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless NBCUniversal, its affiliates and their respective directors, officers, employees and agents from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, suits or proceedings, as well as any and all losses, liabilities, damages, costs and expenses (including reasonable legal fees and costs) arising out of or accruing from (a) any breach of these terms, including any of the foregoing provisions, representations or warranties, and / or from your placement or transmission of any content onto NBCUniversal's servers, and / or from any and all use of your account; (b) any material posted or otherwise provided by you (including without limitation User Content), or any other subscriber or user of your account that infringes any intellectual property right of any person or entity or defames any person or violates their rights of publicity or privacy; (c) any misrepresentation made by you in connection with your use of the online services; and (d) any breach of any of the representation, warranties or other terms or conditions relating to use of your User Content or the online services.

Trump has been making the claim since November, arguing without any evidence that illegal voting was the reason he lost the popular vote to Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton.

After this report, one reporter and at least one client made claims the company accessed their data without their permission.

Critics say the proposal makes ambitious claims, such as being able to process millions of transactions per second, without explaining how.

That claim, however, is premised on the idea that a buyer who uses PRIMARQ would have purchased the same home without PRIMARQ, and not have opted for a less expensive home, on which they could more easily afford to make a down payment.

Equifax's lawyers at Choate, Hall & Stewart had argued (among many other things) that the AG can't wield the state consumer protection law, which prohibits businesses from making false, deceptive or unfair claims, without showing anyone was harmed by Equifax's supposedly false assurances about data security.

You should also note that if you knowingly make any material misrepresentation in your notification that the material or activity is infringing, you will be liable for any damages, including, without limitation, costs and attorneys» fees, incurred by us or the alleged infringer as the result of our relying upon such misrepresentation in removing or disabling access to the material or activity claimed to be infringing.

Homeowners without flood insurance could only make insurance claims based on hurricane wind damage.

So claims the Ava Winery, a San Francisco start - up that is making synthetic wine without grapes — simply by combining flavour compounds and ethanol.

Lambright said companies have often made big claims about private space without doing much.

In addition, brands should be wary of making any health claims without scientific backing.

Without a claim against future profits, and because the tokens on offer have no established exchange value, a token buyer's gain comes solely from his or her ability to enjoy the goods and services that the platform promises to make available.

Such a claim typically comes without any voting rights, but voting rights can sometimes be triggered if the promised payments aren't made.

How is that atheists can claim there is no supernatural causation without any evidence whatsoever then accuse believers of making claims without evidence?

Nonetheless, within the diverse meanderings of this self «proclaimed skeptic there appears an intuition that moral claims without a foundation in God can not make that difficult philosophical movement from «is» to «ought.»

It is an attempt to safeguard individual rights without making any grand claims about his place in the Cosmos.

You have made claims of fact without verifiable evidence.

As for the insults, you might wish to skip the hypocrisy when it is you who claimed that without religion there can be no morals, simply power - you insult many by making such a ludicrous claim and you fail to comprehend that there are only 2 billion Christians in this world... does that make the remaining 5 billion immoral?

People are evil, and in need of a savior, and no atheist can make an exclusive claim otherwise without claiming to have a basis for their «objective» truth.

* sigh *, You are making a claim to truth without proof.

Atheists decry the claim of Christianity to having truth exclusive to only believers, without realizing that the claims they make about truth and reality actually are just as exclusive and less factually - based.

Jim, You continue to make statements without any evidence to the «Facts» you claim to present?

What's more, you make these claims without the first piece of evidence in support.

James, if you had the courage to look at the evidence without bias, you'd not be making the claims you do and suggesting that the bias problem is with others.

It is complete arrogance to make either of those claims without any evidence.

How can one make claims to without full knowledge of?

To make claims of knowledge regarding actions and desires of your god without providing proof of existence is illogical and childlike.

AG, I asked because all too many believers are constantly making the claim that we could not be moral without God, and he is necessary for morality to be objective, and that without God everyone would go around raping and murdering, and that people would not do anything good.

The grittiness of Lent, and the «intransigent historical claims» without which Easter makes no sense at all, should remind us that Christianity does not rest on myths or «narratives,» but on radically changed human lives whose effect on their times are historical fact.

In the second section of our considerations we should like to make several points explaining the possibility of a «democratic» development of the Church without, however, claiming completeness.

Without a claim to «the Way,» or by denying that this claim can even be made, faith becomes an abstraction.

Let's first go back to the claim you actually made: that all of these field will obviously, if purused without bias, support your particular worldview.

Fulfilling desired prophecies in writing (making the sequel fit) is a lot easier, of course, when you can claim their validity without having to show authorship where the validity of said writings could have been further traced.

Man - made fictional unverifiable claims of the supernatural baseless nonsense without a single thing to back it up made up stories to scare children.

You can not make your claim without demonstrating that atheism, by itself, is sufficient to justify mass murder.

All religions seem to imply that they are right, but any scientific minded person (who is also religious) will find that claiming anything as «true» without proof doesn't make any sense.

If you want to make this distinction in 1 John 3:4 - 10, then you must also apply it to 1 John 1:8 «Anyone who claims to be without deliberate sin is a liar and the truth is not in him.»

I agree it IS laughable that anyone would make such a ridiculous claim without any support whatsoever.

You say the issue isn't if there's a God or not, yet people (yourself included) keep making the extraordinary claim of an incorporeal sentient being without the slightest bit of evidence or rational argument.

They believe that such language is defined by the categories of the Enlightenment, that there are different ways of reasoning, and that the church must make its claims to truth on a contested field without shouting in advance that others are wrong and it alone is right.

«Founded by atheism, claimed by atheism, supported by atheism, and exclusively in the interests of atheism, suppressing without mercy every jot of evidence for the divine existence, and so making a positive rational faith in God wholly impossible, the doctrine of evolution may well be set down as not only a foe to theism, but a foe of the most thoroughgoing sort.»

What about all the other gods, all the other religions they make the exact same claim as you without any proof and history has shown over and over again those gods didn't exist either.

This is combined with an alarming tendency to make sweeping statements such as; «New Testament scholars sometimes say that the Gospel accounts of the appearances of the risen Christ are false and his followers did not intentionally claim to be eye - witnesses to his resurrection», without references to back it up.