To those with an IQ larger than their belt size,
claims of global warming require examination of global temperatures, not pictures of something melting.
Not exact matches
Should scientific skeptics
of AGW be
required prove the negative
of all
of the
claims of global warming alarmists?
«It
claimed that «simply proceeding to the discovery phase
of a
global warming case» — during which the oil corporations would be
required to turn over internal documents — «would be significant» for activists...
As such, the positive feedbacks
claimed would
require the same level
of scrutiny as the principle
of global warming via human CO2 production, in order to ascertain the impact.