Sentences with phrase «claims of justice»

When in a parable the problem of the impartial administration of justice arises, the particular takes precedence over the universal, and the claims of justice are overruled by the grace of charity.

One might also argue that this metaphysical view provides some explanation for subordinating the claims of justice to those of utility.

Mill concludes, however, that although justice may sometimes appear to be a moral standard independent of utility, in fact we can adequately account for the claims of justice only if we view them as derivative from and subordinate to the greatest happiness principle.

Moskop thus makes at least three important claims in his brief essay: I) that the five theses adequately and unambiguously represent the framework of Hartshorne's moral philosophy, 2) that Hartshorne's metaphysics justifies not only a broad understanding of altruism but rather a dependence upon an understanding of the principle of utility quite similar to that of utilitarianism, and 3) that in both Hartshorne's moral philosophy and his metaphysics the claims of justice are necessarily subordinate to those of utility.

Such a position, in my judgment, does not satisfactorily honor the claims of Justice.

The structure of relational power, again defined ideally, is such that the claims of justice (from the perspective of unilateral power) are both included and transcended.

Love may inform and inspire reverence for justice — but it can never be an excuse for absolving the claims of justice.

My companions in living, working and visioning; the claims of justice; and the urgings of the spirit are pushing me closer to the roots of the idealism and enthusiasm I embraced ten years ago.

Family love easily becomes self - protective amidst the larger claims of justice.

It is not merely that the claim of these justices to have found a pro-abortion «mandate» in the Constitution is manifestly ludicrous.

John Stuart Mill once argued that the claim of justice depends upon its utility in producing good outcomes.

But if the claim of justice is one of the structures of existence, then the being of the other is violated if this claim is not honoured, even in love.

Not exact matches

U.S. Supreme Court justices expressed support on Tuesday for Microsoft's bid to fend off class action claims by Xbox 360 owners who say the video game console gouges discs because of a design defect.

Trader Joe's also agreed to enter a consent decree and pay a $ 500,000 civil fine to resolve claims it violated the Clean Air Act, the U.S. Department of Justice and Environmental Protection Agency said on Tuesday.

The settlement between the U.S. Justice Department and Red Granite Pictures, which was co-founded by a stepson of Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak, also covers U.S. forfeiture claims against the producer's rights and interests in two other pictures, Daddy's Home and Dumb and Dumber To.

The document claims that the Department of Justice and FBI bypassed proper protocol when they sought a warrant to surveil a Trump campaign adviser.

In January, the Department of Justice announced that McKesson had settled, for $ 150 million, civil claims that from 2008 to 2013 the company had failed to warn the DEA about the large number of suspicious orders of highly addictive painkillers it had shipped to certain parts of the country.

In December 2014, Judy's reached a $ 2 million civil settlement with the Justice Department for claims of improper dispensing.

Warren also called for a criminal investigation of Stumpf, claiming that both the Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission should look into whether the CEO knowingly misled investors by not disclosing the opening of the fake accounts in financial statements.

In 2011, the Department of Justice announced a plan to resolve claims that women and other minorities were discriminated against by the USDA in making and servicing farm loans.

David Goodfriend said 29 of the last 30 times the Justice Department has brought this kind of injunctive claim, it has won the case.

As part of Verizon's settlement it is also paying about $ 355,000 to the U.S. Treasury and withdrawing a challenge to the FCC - New York City agreement while the Justice Department will end a False Claims Act investigation.

A major line of attack in efforts to discredit the Justice Department has been some variation on the claim that the Obama administration ordered politically motivated surveillance of the Trump campaign.

Earlier this month, author Michael Wolff claimed in his controversial book, «Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House,» that Corallo resigned because he viewed Trump's interference as possible obstruction of justice.

Trump also disputed claims of collusion and obstruction of justice in tweets on Tuesday after more than 40 questions that special counsel Robert Mueller wa nts to ask him were revealed in a New York Times article.

He has attacked former FBI Director James Comey for releasing memos he claims are classified, and briefly blocked a Democratic memo from the House Intelligence Committee over its inclusion of classified information, yet he grandstands against redactions insisted upon by his own Justice Department.)

Bank of America paid the FHFA $ 6.3 billion to resolve claims similar to those made by the Justice Department.

Likewise, last October, the Department of Justice released a memo telling its federal agencies to allow maximum discretion to those claiming religious exceptions on the grounds that it was not the government's place to challenge «the reasonableness of a religious belief.»

«It's ironic as many of these companies complained to the US Justice Department four years ago that Google's Flight Search feature would undermine competition — a claim that's clearly not borne out by the facts.

Fried Frank Of Counsel and author of the leading False Claims Act treatise, John T. Boese (on left), and his partner Douglas W. Baruch, offered insightful analysis on two recent Department of Justice policy documents (the «Granston Memo» and the «Brand Memo») and their impact on FCA actions by both qui tam relators and federal prosecutorOf Counsel and author of the leading False Claims Act treatise, John T. Boese (on left), and his partner Douglas W. Baruch, offered insightful analysis on two recent Department of Justice policy documents (the «Granston Memo» and the «Brand Memo») and their impact on FCA actions by both qui tam relators and federal prosecutorof the leading False Claims Act treatise, John T. Boese (on left), and his partner Douglas W. Baruch, offered insightful analysis on two recent Department of Justice policy documents (the «Granston Memo» and the «Brand Memo») and their impact on FCA actions by both qui tam relators and federal prosecutorof Justice policy documents (the «Granston Memo» and the «Brand Memo») and their impact on FCA actions by both qui tam relators and federal prosecutors.

to settle claims brought by the Department of Justice that it had bilked taxpayers out of mortgage insurance through fraudulent foreclosures.

In May, the company paid $ 89 million to settle claims brought by the Department of Justice that it had bilked taxpayers out of mortgage insurance through fraudulent foreclosures.

What claim have they, on the general principle of social justice, to this accession of riches?»

The ad claims that Rosenstein's «incompetence and abuse of power» have «undermined congressional investigations» and tarnished the reputation of the Justice Department.

Nunes criticizes one top justice official, but he doesn't claim that official had anything to do with surveillance of Carter Page.

On November 19, 2013, the Department of Justice («DOJ») announced a $ 13 billion settlement with JPMC to resolve «federal and state civil claims arising out of the packaging, marketing, sale and issuance of residential mortgage - backed securities («RMBS») by JPMorgan, Bear Stearns and Washington Mutual prior to Jan. 1, 2009.

But the warrant had been renewed three times — once by Trump's own Justice Department appointees — and law - enforcement sources claim that the judge had been, contra the memo, informed of the dossier author's political slant.

Back in December, Trump lawyer John Dowd claimed that it was impossible for Trump to be guilty of obstruction of justice, simply because he's the president — an assertion that was roundly derided by legal experts.

Salomon Inc. in connection with the Nasdaq antitrust litigation (United States Department of Justice and class actions) and the 1991 - 1992 criminal investigation and governmental claims arising from its conduct of treasury security auctions.

AT&T's Randall Stephenson began his court testimony defending his company's $ 85 billion acquisition of Time Warner against the Justice Department's antitrust claims.

WASHINGTON — After more than a month of talks, and amid complaints about the nature of the investigation itself, President Trump's advisers have not committed to him testifying in the investigation involving Russian interference in the 2016 election and claims that the president may have tried to obstruct justice.

It is so incomprehensible to understand how a company (Fortune Hi - Tech Marketing) that claims its mere existence is to help as many as possible, with help of the church, can also be so obnoxiously arrogant to believe they can manipulate the justice system to a point where they can push someone to death.

Giambrone's claims that «Justice Scalia's legal theory has no ultimate framework for holding the government accountable before God» and that he sees natural law as merely a «rhetorical cover for the preferred moral agenda of any given judge.»

Again, no one is claiming that Thomas's position is identical with Scalia's, but, given what the great Catholic theologian had to say about the limits of judicial authority in reference to the written law, his position is far closer to that of the late justice than to the idea of a «living» or «evolving» Constitution so ubiquitous today.

I bring my wiring for justice and for wrongs to be righted especially if we claim to be representatives of God.

Joseph Bottum's prudential claim («Christians and the Death Penalty,» August / September) that Christians must deny secular democracies the right to enact stories of high justice is challenging and attractive.

Christians are then left pointing to sociological maladies to vindicate our claims or appealing to the authority of a «pure science» which doesn't exist; or in the case of «same sex marriage,» we're reduced to pleading for private exemptions from public «justice.»

Standing behind that claim is the claim that we, the people, have an ability to know what justice requires that is not so completely dependent upon any social institution as to place that institution beyond the possibility of our reforming it.

Whether or not we would claim that any particular suffering is deserved, it is obvious that there is a significant amount of suffering that simply can not be called either deserved or just according to any reasonable standard of justice.

From the idea of Pakistan to its realization the way seemed difficult, but the justice of the claim was based on such strong grounds that when the British left India they were forced, despite the opposition from all Hindu parties and their own unwillingness, to accede to the demand for Pakistan, which became a reality on the fourteenth of August, 1367 (A.D. 1947).