Sentences with phrase «claims omnipotence»

@ Double R — your god claims omnipotence and omniscience.

His god claims omnipotence and omniscience.

Not exact matches

This clarification also allows us to analyze more clearly Griffin's claim that Plantinga commits the «omnipotence fallacy.»

First, Camus can not reconcile the fact of evil and suffering with the claim of God's goodness and omnipotence.

Aquinas discusses the matter of omnipotence in some detail and at any rate pays lip service to the claim that God has I - omnipotence.

Since he claims both omnscience and omnipotence he must.

And truly God claims, and would have us grant him, omnipotence... a watchful, effective, active sort, engaged in ceaseless activity.

We now behold more clearly in the passion and crucifixion of Jesus the illuminating and healing image of a vulnerable, suffering God who, out of love for the world, renounces any claims to coercive omnipotence and gives the divine self - hood over to the world in an act of absolute self - abandonment.

On the other hand, the hypothesis of the self - emptying God who lovingly renounces any claims to domineering omnipotence has enormous explanatory potential in our attempts to interpret things.

The claim that the central idea of Calvin's theology is God's sovereign omnipotence, which demands our complete obedience and which necessarily entails the doctrine of election and reprobation, is misleading on two grounds.

Since His love - in - operation is His essential nature — He is love, which is His «root - attribute», not aseity, as the older theology claimed — the other things said about Him (transcendence, immanence, omnipotence, omniscience, omni - presence, righteousness, etc.) are to be understood, as I have already argued earlier, as adverbially descriptive of His mode of being love rather than set up as separate or even as distinct attributions.

As should be clear from the foregoing account, Griffin's argument against the standard view of omnipotence rests on the claim that Premise X is in some way deficient.

In order to rebut my claim that there is a big gap between the world as it is and the kind of world that a benevolent creator with traditional omnipotence would be expected to create, Hasker argues that there should be no gap between the kind of world the process deity wanted to create and the world it actually created.

Shoot, we claim total omnipotence in plain English in the third paragraph.