Sentences with phrase «claims on your behalf whether»

We are happy to check your benefits for you and file claims on your behalf whether or not we are on your insurance company's provider list.

Not exact matches

The survey, conducted by Barna Research on behalf of the EA, HOPE and the CofE, claims that in total, 22 per cent of people think Jesus was a mythical figure, while 17 per cent are unsure whether he was real or not.

While the State of Wisconsin is claiming that the farmers are violating regulations for the refrigerated transportation of eggs, there is no indication that these regulations apply to consumers transporting their own eggs, whether they are transporting the eggs themselves directly from the farm, or paying someone else to ship them on their behalf.

A copy of the suit said: «This honourable court will be moved by Gary Nimako Marfo ESQ., counsel for and on behalf of plaintiff / applicants herein praying for an order of interlocutory injunction to restrain defendants / respondents, whether by themselves, agents, servants, workmen, hirelings, privies or any person claiming under or through them or howsoever described, from holding out the second defendant / respondent, [as] the parliamentary candidate - elect for Klottey Korle constituency.»

A copy of the suit, which is available to ClassFMonline.com said: «This honourable court will be moved by Gary Nimako Marfo ESQ., counsel for and on behalf of plaintiff / applicants herein praying for an order of interlocutory injunction to restrain defendants / respondents, whether by themselves, agents, servants, workmen, hirelings, privies or any person claiming under or through them or howsoever described, from holding out the second defendant / respondent, [as] the parliamentary candidate - elect for Klottey Korle constituency.»

A woman who claims she was sexually harassed by the peer refused to rule out legal action, while a statement issued on behalf of Rennard confirmed he was «having to take legal advice with a view to civil action» following an internal investigation into whether he has brought the party into disrepute.

Agency fees are a bald - faced money grab by the unions, but labor leaders dress it up by claiming non-union teachers must pay for the collective bargaining «services» the union provides on their behalf, whether those services are wanted or not.

RELEASE OF LIABILITY You agree that: in consideration of Tails of Gray allowing your participation in this activity, under the terms set forth herein, you, for yourself and on behalf of your child or legal ward, heirs, administrators, personal representatives or assigns, do agree to hold harmless, release, and discharge Tails of Gray, its agent employees, officers, directors, representatives, assigns, members, affiliated organizations, Insurers, and others acting on its behalf of and from all claims, demands, causes of action and legal liability, whether the same be known or unknown anticipated or unanticipated, due to the Tails of Gray and or its associates ordinary negligence: and you further agree that you shall bring no claims, demands, actions and causes of action, and or litigation due to injury, including but not limited to serious bodily injury, death or property damage, sustained by you or your minor child and or legal ward in relation to the premises and operations of Tails of Gray.

Based on a study conducted on their behalf by CE Delft showing the environmental impact of mink farming compared with the production of other clothing, GAIA challenged whether the claim about the eco-friendliness of fur was misleading and could be substantiated.

Whether there is an act of negligence on behalf of a worker or the nursing home itself, you may be entitled to pursue a claim for negligence.

The attorneys at Abels & Annes, P.C. have experience bringing claims on behalf of their injured clients, whether those clients have been hurt in auto accidents, bicycle collisions, slip and falls, medical malpractice, or other incidents.

Indiana law on wrongful death lawsuits is specific about who can file a claim on behalf of a deceased loved one; it often depends on whether the victim was an adult or child.

As merits - based classes defined by injury are impermissible in common law provinces, waiver of tort is the glue to hold together a claim on behalf of all users of a product — without regard to whether it is defective or causes injury... [more]

Regardless of whether the Notice of Termination is given for the landlord's own use under s. 48 or on behalf of a purchaser under s. 49, if the person who claimed to require possession under those sections fails to occupy the rental unit «within a reasonable time after the former tenant vacated the rental unit» (s. 57 (1) RTA), the landlord will be liable under the RTA for failing to give a «good faith» notice of termination and will be liable to significant financial penalties payable to a former tenant and to the Landlord and Tenant Board under s. 57 (3) RTA.

The «Pisti»: Chris was instructed on behalf of the Claimants in relation to this collision claim in the Admiralty Court concerning the question of whether the Defendant vessel had passed too fast and too close to the Claimant's vessel which was alongside at the time.

Our attorneys and experts will investigate your SUV accident in order to determine whether a products liability claim or lawsuit may be brought against a manufacturer on your behalf.

The MLG arrangement discourages maximum commitment on behalf of the class because even if class counsel should win at trial, they will not be entitled to any compensation, whether from the recovery (no such agreement is in place) or via the plaintiff's claim for costs (no costs can be awarded because the representative plaintiff has no liability to pay legal expenses.

Our litigators are well prepared to protect the rights of our clients, whether it involves defending a claim against a client or prosecuting a claim on behalf of a client.

Whether we are negotiating or fighting on your behalf with an insurance company concerning a work injury or car accident claim or discussing your case with a prosecutor in connection with criminal charges, we work closely with you to find the specific solution that meets the needs of you and your family and loved ones.

-- Satyam Computer Services Ltd v Upaid Systems Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 487, [2008] 2 All ER (Comm) 465 (as junior to David Foxton QC): instructed by Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer LLP to act on behalf of the respondent in the Court of Appeal in an action concerning the proper constructions of three commercial agreements and in particular whether the parties to a settlement agreement were to be taken to have excluded fraud claims.

He will review your case to determine whether you have a viable claim; if so, he will fight on your behalf to recover financial compensation for your injury.

Regardless of whether the Notice of Termination is given for landlord's own use under s. 48 or on behalf of a purchaser under s. 49, if the person who claimed to require possession under those sections fails to occupy the rental unit «within a reasonable time after the former tenant vacated the rental unit» (s. 57 (1) RTA), the landlord will be liable under the RTA for failing to give a «good faith» notice of termination and will be liable to significant financial penalties payable to a former tenant and to the Landlord and Tenant Board under s. 57 (3) RTA.

The only issue before the Court of Appeal was whether the CFAs, standing alone, provided a sufficient basis on which to rest a valid claim to recover from the paying party a share of the costs incurred by Burroughs Day on behalf of a large group of clients.

In this issue we look at Bills of lading — claims on behalf of third party, Delivery of cargo without bill of lading — whether letters of indemnity engaged, Hague Rule..

Response: Whether and when to assert a claim of privilege on a patient's behalf is a matter for other law and for the ethics of the individual health care provider.

We will review all aspects of your case to determine whether you are likely to receive compensation, and if this is the case we can act on your behalf throughout the claims process.

If an application overcomes the hurdles in CA 2006, s 263 (2) the court will then take into account the discretionary factors set out in s 263 (3) which states: «(3) In considering whether to give permission (or leave) the court must take into account, in particular --(a) whether the member is acting in good faith in seeking to continue the claim; (b) the importance that a person acting in accordance with section 172 (duty to promote the success of the company) would attach to continuing it; (c) where the cause of action results from an act or omission that is yet to occur, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be --(i) authorised by the company before it occurs, or (ii) ratified by the company after it occurs; (d) where the cause of action arises from an act or omission that has already occurred, whether the act or omission could be, and in the circumstances would be likely to be, ratified by the company; (e) whether the company has decided not to pursue the claim; (f) whether the act or omission in respect of which the claim is brought gives rise to a cause of action that the member could pursue in his own right rather than on behalf of the company.»

Also in May, the law firm of Bronstein, Gewirtz & Grossman LCC announced that it was investigating potential claims on behalf of purchasers of the ALC securities, determining whether the company and certain officers and directors violated federal securities laws.

Joseph P. Day Realty Corp. v. Chera (308 A.D. 2d 148)- broker's complaint for commissions reinstated where questions of fact exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause of a commercial tenant and if there was an implied contract which arose from landlord's acceptance of the benefits of broker's services; broker must plead and prove a contract of employment, express or implied, and in the absence of an express contract, an implied contract may be established in some cases by the mere acceptance of the labors of the broker; broker failed to establish that it was a third party beneficiary of lease agreement between landlord and tenant where provisions in lease merely provided for indemnification between the parties and did not expressly set forth that one party would be obligated to pay the broker's commission; indemnification provisions in the lease agreement do provide evidence of implied contract of employment with landlord where landlord agreed to indemnify tenant against brokerage commission claims from all brokers including plaintiff and where, to the contrary, tenant's reciprocal indemnification excluded plaintiff; triable issues of fact exist as to whether broker was the procuring cause where broker introduced the parties, showed the space to tenant's representatives, was involved in weekly negotiations with the parties over the lease terms, conveyed offers on behalf of tenant to landlord and participated in the meeting with the landlord and tenant at which the lease terms were finalized