Sentences with phrase «claims policy now»

Not exact matches

Bowman & Partners discussed its options with Business Insurance Now, an online agent that had previously sold the company a general liability policy offering protection against injury claims, property damage and other physical - world concerns.

And on the basis of catching this questionable fish May claims: «This is indeed historic... We are a party whose ideas and policies are now in the mainstream of the public debate.»

Facebook's policies previously allowed developers to siphon off app users» Facebook friends data — though Facebook tightened up these permissions in 2014 — «to dramatically reduce data access», as founder Mark Zuckerberg has now claimed — though evidently not dramatically enough for Mozilla.

Now it's fresh fruit price wars and yet again there are claims that too much price competition is anti-competitive and there are calls for competition policy review (please no!)

Former Premier League star Jamie Redknapp has made a rather laughable claim about Chelsea's transfer policy and the loss of Romelu Lukaku and Mohamed Salah, who are now star players for rivals Manchester United and Liverpool, respectively.

As some of our readers know by now, IMANI is, in keeping with past tradition, strongly focused exactly on this issue: filtering out partisan and self - serving opinions and claims from solid facts in the promises and policy proposals being made by politicians in the lead up to the 2016 elections.

Liberal Democrats in government have gone to war with Michael Gove over his free schools policy, which it is now claimed is costing 30,000 school places.

It seems that opponents of raising the PA are now reduced to denying that the policy actually exists in the form that Clegg claims it does and the party website claims it does in order to maintain their argument.

Any day now the Supreme Court will rule on a case which claims that the policy discriminates against the disabled.

Highlights were policies still claimed by Labour today as among its most significant achievements — the creation of the minimum wage, Scottish and Welsh devolution, and bills to reduce class sizes — as well as one key Brownite policy whose wisdom has now become disputed: independence for the Bank of England, which also involved removing its role as City regulator.

We want to reassure pensioners claiming housing benefit that they will not be affected by this policy now, or when Universal Credit begins, even if one partner is below pension age.

Incidentally, check out the laughable Mockney «dahn wit» da voters» Yvette Cooper's extraordinary claims just now that Cameron's spending policy is not «just mad, but dangerous»: http://www.politicshome.com/Landing.aspx?blog=7348&perma=link

Acting on behalf of 17 people suing the publisher of the now - defunct News of the World and the Sun over alleged phone hacking, David Sherborne claimed on Monday there were documents, emails and meeting agendas that showed senior executives including Murdoch and Rebekah Brooks pursued an email deletion policy that removed «emails that could be unhelpful in future litigation in which News International could be a defendant».

«You claimed at Prime Minister's Questions today that «yesterday Labour announced — in an important announcement — that it is now their policy to put up taxes on middle income people».

Now the medical journal BMJ has claimed there is insufficient evidence that the drug prevents serious complications of flu to warrant the policy.

Gary Orfield, professor of education, law, political science, and urban planning at UCLA, said opponents of the UT admission policy claim there are nonracial alternatives that do the job just as well, including the 10 % plan that UT now uses as its first phase for admission; approaches using socioeconomic status rather than race as a factor; and special outreach and recruitment efforts.

At the recent launch event for the CUNY Institute for Education Policy, David Coleman, now known as the «architect» of the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards, was asked by a member of the audience why a teacher, who cited the Common Core standards emphasis on «informational texts,» would claim that she was told to «put away her literature books and photocopy microwave instructions» for her eighth - grade students.

Bothered by what it describes as the report's exaggerated claims, the company, Mathematica Policy Research of Princeton, N.J., has now taken the unusual step of issuing a statement that cautions against leaping to any policy concluPolicy Research of Princeton, N.J., has now taken the unusual step of issuing a statement that cautions against leaping to any policy conclupolicy conclusions.

It's now obvious that advertising claims behind current education policies like the Common Core were never based on strong objective evidence.

As we all likely know well by now, speakers for both parties during last and this weeks» Republican and Democratic Conventions, respectively, spoke and in many cases spewed a number of exaggerated, misleading, and outright false claims about multiple areas of American public policy... educational policy included.

That would be an additional insured, and that's generally not a situation you want to be in because it can impact the ability of your policy to respond to a claim by the landlord because they're now a party to the policy.

Many falsely claim that this option is now made available by a new government program or policy sponsored by U.S. President Barak Obama (read about what Obama Student Loan Forgiveness really is).

Subsequent research showed that what appear to be Daybreak reps have attempted to alter the company's Wikipedia page to reflect its new ownership claims since the government sanctions were announced, earning a block from the online encyclopedia's editors; a 2015 press release (now here) announcing Columbus Nova as the new owner and the 2015 privacy policy (now here) that had been hosted on Daybreak's web servers were also apparently memoryholed by the company.

Now you get it correct: I claim that the linear response models («sensitivity studies») are fundamentally insufficient for the purpose of prediction and «policy making».

Now, 28 years later, apparently, and despite all the scientific work that's been done and all the Policy Makers talk that has occurred, some people STILL DO NOT KNOW... or at claim not to know!

On a more serious note, Brunelli's cover note also makes very clear that, far from the «transparent,» «educational» organization ALEC now claims to be, ALEC told its funders a different story: «One hundred percent of our energy and effort goes into winning the public policy debate and championing a free market economy... [elipses original] a pro-business, pro-growth, pro-freedom, limited government agenda.»

Even now, people on the left claim that the social policies of the USSR were better than those in the West and that the Soviets had no plans for invasion of Western Europe of first use of WMD.

That might sound good on the surface, but Pruitt's claim is misleading — he ignores the fact that emissions went down in part because of Obama - era policies that Pruitt and others in the Trump administration are now undoing.

Now, of course, many see the Pope's claim about morality unsurprising but fail to understand the profound significance for climate policy - making of understanding climate change fundamentally as a moral issue.

I noticed how they kept pushing policies, like Kyoto and now the disaster - in - waiting, cap and trade, and noticed that none of the policies they push actually do anything to cure what they claim needs fixing.

5) if you manage to do 1 - 4 successfully, congratulations: Now you can legitimately lay claim to your theories / models being valid ones and then we can begin the assessment of what policies can achieve the end result with as minimal impact on our collective economies.

So rather than claiming that climate science is a hoax, a fraud or fundamentally flawed, they now say the proposed climate policies will have little, if any, impact on the planet's temperature gauge and are therefore a waste of time and money.

Now the politicians must deal with facts and abandon all policies based on the claims that CO2 is causing climate change.

What is going to happen now, is, with the claims made policies, which is how the lawyers professional liability policies are written, they're written on a step basis.

In the same way that AI tells insurance companies which policies are more likely to have claims, AI will now tell you which lawsuits are more likely to be successful.

If you know your policy number, you can reach out to the carrier in writing, letting them know that you have suffered some level of fire - related damage, that you intend to pursue a claim, and that for now, you are looking for assistance in coverages under your policy.

Our readers will by now be familiar with the news that total claims costs (including internal handling costs) for each of the 2011 and 2012 policy years are expected to be in the $ 100 million ballpark.

Thus, where a claim based on cybercrime (now a defined term under our policy) would otherwise be eligible for coverage (because it arises from a lawyer's delivery of professional services), it will be covered, but only up to a sublimit of $ 250,000, including defence, repair and indemnity costs together.

The law is now clear that a former employee can base a claim for an increased punitive damage award on their employer's systemic bad faith policies or practices in the manner in which it treats its employees.

The policy will also now extend the $ 250,000 per claim and in the aggregate defence - only coverage under the endorsement for «Claims Brought by CORPORATE EMPLOYERS» to include coverage for seconded lawyers in those circumstances.

These important statements have now been transposed into the civil context, and the proposition that inadequate reasons for judgment can amount to an independent ground of appeal has recently been applied in Sagl v. Chubb Insurance Company of Canada, 2009 ONCA 388 (C.A.), a case involving a claim on an insurance policy.

«It is crucial that businesses now watch this case closely over coming months, and in the meantime they should seek legal advice to ensure their contracts and policies around the engagement of staff are absolutely watertight, to avoid the risk of similar claims.»

However, in addition to paying a higher insurance premium, you are now 1 out of 3 claims away from the possibility of having your policy cancelled by the insurer.

Think about it this way: if your car insurance plan is lacking when it comes time to make a claim, those low prices you were so concerned with at the outset of your policy will now be more than overshadowed by significant out of pocket expenses.

Although State Farm Insurance withdrew from insuring property in Florida temporarily after extensive claims in the state, it now continues to write property policies in the state of Florida.

Now your auto insurance rates are going up, even though you've never filed a claim against your policy.

Some auto insurance companies now offer endorsements that will give you a limited amount of coverage for your personal property which avoids your larger homeowner deductible and more importantly putting in a claim against your homeowner policy.

Unfortunately i had bad experience in trip, founded nail in tire, send claim to you to provide the coverage i paid for, after month, 2013 February 14, i received the mail, that you not covering the trucks with this insurance, THAT YOU SOLD TO ME... in mail was phone number 1-800-334-7525, so i call, 0 results, policy no money back... supervisor told it's not her department that i have to write to sales support and so on... gave me e mail so i wrote to salessupport@allianzssistance, been a week 0 answers.I feel like your insurance stole my money and don't won't to cover the claim now, still waiting for answers...

Never sent a policy to me and now claiming my medical reason is not covered.

Also, remember multiple claims can really make your rates skyrocket, or even cause your insurer to non-renew at the end of your policy because you're now viewed to be too much of a risk.