Sentences with phrase «claims presented for»

COVER LETTER: Respectfully Yours, Donna N. Roye - Morton Responsible for accurately performing a retrospective, concurrent and special claims reviews / audits on asbestos claims presented for payment before the various DCPF trusts.

In addition, the board does not adequately audit claims presented for payment.»

Not exact matches

Claims of a massive cost blowout for Perth's new stadium have been denied by the state government, which says the latest estimate of $ 1.6 billion simply reflects a different way of presenting the numbers.

Although Us Weekly confirmed TMZ's report that Thompson was present for the birth, its sources also claimed that he is not going to try to stop Kardashian from leaving Ohio.

The state says the Silicon Valley company has presented Oregon with «false claims» for more than $ 240 million as payment for those contracts over the past three years.

The company wanted to correct what it claimed was false information presented by an employee, so it tweeted out its reasons for the dismissal.

That claim prompted Ticer to present a printout from Neiman's website reading, «You may return for credit, at any time, merchandise with which you are not completely satisfied.»

At present, taxpayers who take the standard deduction can not claim a deduction for charitable giving.

The judge has ruled that Uber can't present what Anthony Levandowski claims is the reason why he downloaded Google's files for self - driving technology.

Fear of money laundering was one of the reasons given for the ban, however, in typical fashion, no hard facts were presented to back up the claims.

At present, the ratio for Continued Claims has been trending down.

While Evangelicals greatly respect the way in which the Catholic Church has defended many historic Christian teachings against relativizing and secularizing trends, and recognize the role of the present pontiff in that important task today, they believe that some aspects of Catholic doctrine are not biblically warranted, and they do not accept any claims of infallibility made for the magisterial teachings of popes or church councils.

present the evidence you claim exists for god.

Perhaps he should have said, «If you allow yourself to accept fantastic, unsupported claims as explanations for natural phenomena, your world becomes complicated in that natural phenomena that conflict with your nonsensical beliefs are constantly being presented to you.»

@ # $ Ing wrong... people like you are disgusting, claim that we're idiots for our beliefs and yet, you present no ideas, you simply try to tear others down... well lets hear your «ideas» so i can destroy your idiotic belief

If the characteristic mark of hermeneutical theology is its interpretive stance, especially in regard to texts — both the classic text of the Judeo - Christian tradition (the Hebrew Scriptures and the New Testament) and the exemplary theologies that build on the classic text — then heuristic theology is also interpretive, for it claims that its successful unconventional metaphors are not only in continuity with the paradigmatic events and their significance expressed in this classic text but are also appropriate expressions of these matters for the present time.

Your argumnet falls flat on its face... the first claiming there needs to be a designer since it is so complex, which would then need a designer for the designer, then a designer for the designer of the designer... etc.etc.etc... and then claiming all these things exist that REQUIRED a designer... not acknowledging there are many many things that exist that there is no sign a designer was present.

But the message of divine acceptance is sometimes presented as an ultimately sentimental underwriting of every sort of self - indulgence, disregard of the claims of others, cruelty and self - deception, as if everything, but everything, was for the best in the best of all possible worlds.

To present man's desire for the transcendent without proposing a claim to a particular method in which man meets the divine is almost certainly an abandonment of the religious project.

In Chile and during an airborne press conference returning to Rome, Francis had accused the victims of «calumny» for pressing their case against Barros, demanded they present «proof» of their claims, revealed he had twice rejected Barros» resignation and insisted: «I am convinced he is innocent.»

For if we try to claim that God is present but can not give evidence of his presence, then God becomes incredible.

Bass presents practicing the sabbath as a countercultural habit of claiming a weekly day for resting in God's blessings.

In the conference the Eastern Orthodox delegates explicitly claimed infallibility for their church, and a like claim of infallibility was more or less present in the minds of many delegates of other churches.

It occurs every time any religious body claims infallibility for any idea it presents.

But we may want to question at least the second of these claims; for if we no longer exist, our deepest present desire — the longing for God — will have been vain and futile.

Kyle: Present evidence for even one of the miracles that you are claiming.

While proponents of reparations for blacks present their case in the clear - cut language of a legal claim for damages, the issue is really political and moral, and this sets certain limitations.

The answer is, instead of presenting evidence in support of his claims, he demands others look for evidence supporting his claims.

Metaphysics for Bergson strives to minimize the mediation of all symbols (like words and concepts), and although metaphysics «claims to dispense with symbols,» it can not dispense with them entirely.13 Hence, since it requires reflection and articulation (in spite of being based on intuition) metaphysics will always be required to genuflect at the door to the sanctuary of the intellect (even though the immediacy of Being, analogous to the Holy Spirit in a Christian sanctuary is supposed to be present in intuition), and it is in the moment of genuflection that the idea of logical necessity infiltrates metaphysics and becomes an unhappy resident alien.

It is to claim that for the purposes of addressing our three central issues about theological schooling it is the decisively important mode in which the Christian thing is present.

Language's claim to present inner experience and describe how reality is corresponds to our desire for some ultimate «word» or «reality» in which to ground all experience.

If this aspect differed in kind in the case of Jesus from every other member of the species man, then in the present state of our knowledge it would seem impossible rightly to describe Jesus as a man.17 It may be the case that most Christians (and most Christian theologians) in most centuries have accepted this claim: but most have not shared either our modern sensitivity to the difference between history and mythology or our concern for the principles of logic.

The reason for my present line of questioning with Steve and Brigitte is due their repeated claims of «truth» and «reality» being in alignment with their particular brand of beliefs.

But behind those big numbers and Bush's earlier boast that he had gone «the last mile for peace» is the really big fact that he refused to practice any constructive diplomacy: no arbitration of claims; no discussion of a wider Middle East conference; not even any «face - saving» device for a proud Arab dictator that just might have freed Kuwait and prevented the present carnage (we shall never know).

In thus presenting a theistic interpretation of Jesus and his resurrection, insisting upon an ontological element where others see only myth, I will be held by some to have abandoned all claim to offer proposals for a modern Christology.

For if the data of experience consisted only of universals, then the experiencing subject would have to infer the existence of other individual actual entities, just as Descartes claimed to infer the existence of a real man in the street from the sense - data present to his eyes.

You may see it as crazy talk, but you make the claim daily and I ask for evidence — if you had any, you'd present it, but each day it's the same dance.

God revealed himself through actual miracles in Jesus for a short period of time with the express purpose fulfilling prophecy and presenting the Jew and Gentile proof that Christ is who He claims to be.

Given current lack of evidence for proof of anything supernatural, will there be leniency for those who simply and honestly claim, «I don't know», granted there is a supernatural, and that the Christian God is the true God who did present us with an ultimatum to accept him or not, expecting us to wage the eternal fate of our soul?

The explanation of this distinctive conception, scholars have suggested, is that Mark, fully convinced that Jesus was the Messiah, could find no clear evidence that he had presented himself as such to the Jewish nation; and the reason for this silence, Mark decided, could only be that Jesus was not yet ready to claim his Messiahship publicly and did not want the fact divulged prematurely.

For so long as he is not aware that the present moment is final, is claimed, constrains to decision, his idea of God is a phantasm.

God is God of the present for the sinner precisely because He casts him into remoteness from Himself, and He is at the same time God of the future because He never relinquishes His claim on the sinner and opens to him by forgiveness a new future for new obedience.

To tell the congregational story, therefore, is an act of confession in which the parish acknowledges that while it is the principal author of its plot, and accepts the design of its past and the nature of its present, in the light of God's story for all humankind it also resolves to claim a transformed future.

You claim evidence for a young earth but present none and then claim science rejects evolution which is like claiming water isn't wet.

The most that the present writer believes can ever be claimed for a gospel narrative is that it may represent a typical scene from the ministry of Jesus, for example the narrative of the Paralytic at Capernaum, Mark 2:1 — 12 par.

Though it is entirely legitimate for a scientist, or anyone else, to present philosophical or theological arguments against naturalistic evolution, it can not properly be claimed that such arguments are themselves scientific ones.

In response to your question: «what would happen if someone claimed to have # 7, but doesn't seem to have # 8 - 10», I'd propose the following: — As an individual looking at my own life, if I observe # 8 (communion) isn't present (my prayer life isn't fruitful, I'm not thirsting for the word, etc), I need to take an honest look at # 7 — do I really understand my need for a Savior and did I really accept His grace.

What I propose, therefore, is to provide an account of what it means to learn a craft, to learn — for example — how to lay brick, in the hope that we may be able to claim forms of care and discipline unnoticed but nonetheless present in the church.

This litany of false claims you have presented is nothing but extremist hysteria designed to whip people into an emotional frenzy while hoping they fail to evaluate the facts for themselves.

In the present work, therefore, without in any way claiming adequacy for our treatment, we shall bring to the front the theme of God's self - emptying as central to the theology of revelation.