Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations
under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue
under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution of key milestones such as the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third party approvals for the consummation of our announced acquisition of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing
under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability of all parties to satisfy their performance requirements
under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor
disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect of changes in tax law, such as the effect of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment of interest on, and principal of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure
under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact of ongoing or future litigation,
claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty
claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
He even suggested that Comey lied
under oath,
disputing the
claim that Trump hinted that Comey should drop the Flynn investigation.
The Arbitrator, and not any federal, state or local court or agency, shall have the exclusive authority to resolve any
dispute arising
under or relating to the validity, interpretation, applicability, enforceability or formation of these Terms of Service and / or these arbitration provisions in Section 26 hereof, including but not limited to any
claim that all or any part of these Terms of Service is void or voidable;
«Despite Apple's
claims against Qualcomm, Apple suppliers remain contractually obligated to pay royalties to Qualcomm
under their license agreements with us, including for sales of iPhones to Apple,» Qualcomm President Derek Aberle said of the
dispute on the company's conference call in April.
In the event that we are not able to resolve a
dispute, we each agree that any and all
disputes, controversies, or
claims arising
under, arising out of, or relating in any way to this agreement, or the contractual relationship established by this agreement (whether in contract, tort, or
under any statute, regulation, ordinance, or any other source of law) shall be resolved on an individual basis through binding arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association, in accordance with the American Arbitration Association's rules for arbitration of consumer - related
disputes (accessible at https://www.adr.org/aaa/faces/rules)(except that you may assert individual
claims in small
claims court, if your
claims qualify).
These Terms of Service and any controversy,
claim or
dispute arising
under or related to these Terms of Service will be construed, pursued and resolved in accordance with and will be governed by the laws of Massachusetts, USA without regard to its conflicts of laws provisions.
Any
claim related to any
dispute arising as a result of the site or
under these Terms shall be made before a court of competent jurisdiction located in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
In the sustained if intermittent violent
disputes with her near neighbors, Ammon and Moab (Lot), and Edom (Esau), Israel continues to recognize her close kinship with these semitic groups but insists in the stories that her
claim to Canaan was validated long before she came out of Egypt and into the land
under Joshua.
The Republicans» case, resting on this informal
claim that can always be
disputed, is already
under assault.
If you believe that your work has been copied and posted on the Website in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please send the following information to our Copyright Agent (see 17 U.S.C. § 512 (c)(3) for further detail): (i) a description of the copyrighted work that you
claim has been infringed; (ii) a description of where the allegedly infringed material is located on the Website; (iii) a written statement that you have a good - faith belief that the
disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (iv) your address, telephone number, and email address so that Non-GMO Project is able to contact you; (v) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; and (vi) a statement by you, made
under penalty of perjury, that the information in your report is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.
If you believe that your work has been copied in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please provide MomsTeam's Agent for Notice of
claims of copyright or other intellectual property infringement («Agent») the written information specified below: (1) An electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; (2) A description of the copyrighted work that you
claim has been infringed upon, or if multiple copyright works at a single online site are covered by a single notification, a representative list of such works at that site; (3) A description of where the material that you
claim is infringing is located on the Web site; (4) Your address, telephone number, and e-mail address; (5) A statement by you that you have a good - faith belief that the
disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; (6) A statement by you, made
under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.
Further, in any such
dispute,
under no circumstances will participant be permitted to obtain awards for, and hereby waives all rights to
claim punitive, incidental, or consequential damages, including reasonable attorneys» fees, other than participant's actual out - of - pocket expenses (i.e. costs associated with entering this Giveaway), and participant further waives all rights to have damages multiplied or increased.
Twitter users also lined up to express their disgust while the British Dental Association said such checks would be unethical and
disputed claims they would determine whether someone was
under the age of 18.
President Trump said he is «100 percent» willing to testify
under oath about his interactions with James Comey in order to
dispute the fired FBI director's
claims.
They can't comment on the individual cases raised, but point out that a crucial question will be whether the councils concerned have the five year land supply to meet their housing need - which councils are require to have
under the National Planning Policy Framework which together with its presumption in favour of sustainable development the National Trust, of which Jenkins is Chairman, apparently supported, along with the CPRE (
claims my source, who also
disputes Hastings's figures on the amount of land built on in any way).
«CNN FALSELY reported that former FBI Director James Comey would
dispute President Trump's
claim that he was told he is not
under investigation.
He repeated a much
disputed claim that the correspondence with Ms. Cunningham is protected
under an exemption in FOIL that protects «internal deliberations.»
Such
claims, however, have little practical effect
under the treaty, which does not recognize,
dispute, or establish territorial
claims, and establishes an access system to the continent governed by the 50 nations that have signed the treaty.
The exclusive means of resolving any
dispute or
claim arising out of or relating to these Terms of Use (including any alleged breach thereof), the Service, or the Website shall be BINDING ARBITRATION administered by the American Arbitration Association
under the Consumer Arbitration Rules.
Without limiting the foregoing, if you believe that your work has been copied and posted on the Service in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please provide our Copyright Agent with the following information: an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; a description of the copyrighted work that you
claim has been infringed; a description of where the material that you
claim is infringing is located on the Web site; your address, telephone number, and email address; a written statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the
disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; a statement by you, made
under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.
The parties agree that any and all controversies,
disputes or
claims arising out of or
under this Agreement, shall be exclusively governed and decided by binding arbitration
under the Federal Arbitration Act in conformity with the Rules and Procedures as established by the American Arbitration Association, and the determination of the arbitrator shall be final and binding (except to the extent there exist grounds for vacation of an award
under applicable arbitration statutes).
Without limiting the foregoing, if you believe that your work has been copied and posted on the Service in a way that constitutes copyright infringement, please provide our Copyright Agent with the following information: an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright interest; a description of the copyrighted work that you
claim has been infringed; a description of where the material that you
claim is infringing is located on the Website; your address, telephone number, and email address; a written statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the
disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; a statement by you, made
under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.
You and Velocity Micro agree that any
claim,
dispute, or controversy, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, and whether pre-existing, present or future, and including statutory, common law, intentional tort and equitable claims («Dispute») against Velocity Micro, its employees, agents, successors, assigns or affiliates arising from, in connection with, or relating to this Agreement, its interpretation, or the breach, termination, or validity thereof, the relationships which result from this Agreement (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not signatories to this Agreement), Velocity Micro's advertising or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED, EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY, BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION under its Code of Procedure then in
dispute, or controversy, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, and whether pre-existing, present or future, and including statutory, common law, intentional tort and equitable
claims («
Dispute») against Velocity Micro, its employees, agents, successors, assigns or affiliates arising from, in connection with, or relating to this Agreement, its interpretation, or the breach, termination, or validity thereof, the relationships which result from this Agreement (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not signatories to this Agreement), Velocity Micro's advertising or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED, EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY, BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION under its Code of Procedure then in
Dispute») against Velocity Micro, its employees, agents, successors, assigns or affiliates arising from, in connection with, or relating to this Agreement, its interpretation, or the breach, termination, or validity thereof, the relationships which result from this Agreement (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not signatories to this Agreement), Velocity Micro's advertising or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED, EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY, BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION
under its Code of Procedure then in effect.
If your creditors can back up their
claims on any
disputed items, the credit bureaus are
under no obligation to remove those items, no matter how many
disputes you file.
Any
claim, dispute, or controversy («Claim») arising out of or relating in any way to: i) this Agreement; ii) the Savings Account; iii) your establishment of the Savings Account; iv) your use of the Savings Account; v) the amount of available funds in the Savings Account; vi) advertisements, promotions or oral or written statements related to the Savings Account; vii) the benefits and services related to the Savings Account; or viii) transactions made using the Savings Account, no matter how described, pleaded or styled, shall be FINALLY and EXCLUSIVELY resolved by binding individual arbitration conducted by the American Arbitration Association («AAA») under its Consumer Arbitration R
claim,
dispute, or controversy («
Claim») arising out of or relating in any way to: i) this Agreement; ii) the Savings Account; iii) your establishment of the Savings Account; iv) your use of the Savings Account; v) the amount of available funds in the Savings Account; vi) advertisements, promotions or oral or written statements related to the Savings Account; vii) the benefits and services related to the Savings Account; or viii) transactions made using the Savings Account, no matter how described, pleaded or styled, shall be FINALLY and EXCLUSIVELY resolved by binding individual arbitration conducted by the American Arbitration Association («AAA») under its Consumer Arbitration R
Claim») arising out of or relating in any way to: i) this Agreement; ii) the Savings Account; iii) your establishment of the Savings Account; iv) your use of the Savings Account; v) the amount of available funds in the Savings Account; vi) advertisements, promotions or oral or written statements related to the Savings Account; vii) the benefits and services related to the Savings Account; or viii) transactions made using the Savings Account, no matter how described, pleaded or styled, shall be FINALLY and EXCLUSIVELY resolved by binding individual arbitration conducted by the American Arbitration Association («AAA»)
under its Consumer Arbitration Rules.
Binding Arbitration: ANY
CLAIM,
DISPUTE, OR CONTROVERSY (WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT, OR OTHERWISE, WHETHER PREEXISTING, PRESENT OR FUTURE, AND INCLUDING STATUTORY, COMMON LAW, INTENTIONAL TORT AND EQUITABLE
CLAIMS) BETWEEN CLIENT AND Mulcoy Travel, its respective agents, employees, principals, successors, assigns, or affiliates arising from or relating to these terms and conditions, interpretation thereof, or the breach, termination or validity thereof, the relationships which result from the tour (including, to the full extent permitted by applicable law, relationships with third parties who are not parties to these terms and conditions), Mulcoy Travel's advertising, or any related purchase SHALL BE RESOLVED EXCLUSIVELY AND FINALLY BY BINDING ARBITRATION ADMINISTERED BY THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION (AAA)
under its Code of Procedure then in effect.
(i) ARBITRATION NOTICE: For any
claim (excluding
claims for injunctive or other equitable relief)
under this Agreement, the party requesting relief shall resolve the
dispute through binding arbitration or through small
claims courts.
(a) an electronic or physical signature of the person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the copyright; (b) a description of the copyrighted work that you
claim has been infringed; (c) the URL of the location on our website or the Service containing the material that you
claim is infringing; (d) your address, telephone number, and email address; (e) a statement by you that you have a good faith belief that the
disputed use is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law; and (f) a statement by you, made
under penalty of perjury, that the above information in your notice is accurate and that you are the copyright owner or authorized to act on the copyright owner's behalf.
Regarding eugenics, you forgot the overwhelming similarity that they were both widespread, media - friendly, commonly - believed «facts» that proved to be false (whether or not Global Warming is false is obviously debatable, but he's operating with that disclaimer when he makes the comparison, and thus it is necessary to operate
under it when
disputing his
claims.)
These people
dispute the
claims of those living
under wind turbines that this makes them sick.
The federal government
disputed all of MacDermid Lamarsh's
claim except $ 22,476 in fees for work done
under s. 13.02 of the IRSSA, which held that the government agreed to pay lawyers who attended the negotiations for time spent up to the settlement at their normal hourly rate.
Matters not covered by the plan include divorce and alimony, child custody or support, personal injury
claims, bankruptcy, credit records, insurance
disputes, mediation, driving
under the influence, garnishment and easements.
While there was no
dispute with the construction of the
claims the Federal Court had jumped directly to describe these
claims in comparison with the three ingredients contained in Complera, without interpreting both sections 4 (2)(a) and (b) to assess whether the
claims fell more appropriately
under (a) or (b).
Erste Group Bank AG v JSC VMZ «Red October» (above):
dispute between applicability of Russian and English law to tort
claims under Rome II Regulation.
Any interpretation of its content,
claims or
disputes (of whatever nature and not limited to contractual issues) shall be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the English Courts
under English law.
9.1 (1) In this section, «settlement» means an agreement between an insurer and in insured person that finally disposes of a
claim or
dispute in respect of the insured person's entitlement to one or more benefits
under the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule.
He has experience of banking & financial services
disputes of a varied nature, including
under LMA facility agreements, mortgage
disputes (including possession proceedings), prime brokerage, derivatives,
claims in relation to «vishing» scams and for recovery of mistaken bank payments, in the context of both commercial and retail banking.
Representing an overseas company in relation to a high value international shareholders»
dispute, derivative action and fraud
claim brought
under the UNCITRAL arbitration rules.
He represents insurance companies in cases involving first - party and third - party
claims, personal lines and commercial policies, bad faith
claims, complex coverage
disputes, class actions and
claims under California's Business and Professions Code.
Caroline is instructed in a wide range of commercial and chancery
disputes including: general contractual
disputes; civil fraud; breach of directors» duties; shareholder
disputes; derivative
claims; jurisdiction issues; applications
under the Bankers» Books Evidence Act 1879; joint venture agreements; financial services
disputes; insurance / re-insurance; enforcement of foreign judgments; mortgage fraud and
claims concerning undue influence.
In a blog post, John McFarland of Graves, Dougherty, Hearon & Moody discusses a lawsuit over a petroleum lease
dispute that led to a
claim under Texas» Anti-SLAPP statute.
Our specialist barristers accept instructions for
claims and advice
under the Civil Partnership Act 2004 and are able to provide expert advice and representation to civil partners in
disputes, concerning inheritance, trust planning, property, finance and children.
The EAT found that a
claim under CLIA 1978 for a contribution was not a complaint by «a complainant»; rather a
dispute between two respondents.
If a right of set - off is accepted in principle, then the better position for a seller is for the
claim to have been determined and agreed
under an arbitral award (or whichever other
dispute resolution process is applicable); the main alternative and slightly weaker position for a seller is for the matter to be decided by a relevant expert (depending on the nature of the
claim).
Tom has experience across a wide range of commercial cases, including
disputes regarding contractual construction, duties
under contracts and in tort, issues of quantum and substantial banking & finance and civil fraud
claims.
Arbitrations involving
claims between boiler and machinery and property insurers
under the
Disputed Loss Agreement
Under the previous system, there was no cost to the accident victim to
dispute an insurer's denial of a
claim.
He has acted for the liquidator in Edennote v Terry Venables; successfully resisted the winding - up of Stock, Aiken & Waterman; acted for the preference shareholders in the Barings
dispute; advises on
claims involving the transaction avoidance provisions of the Insolvency Act; appeared in Edward Klempka: In Re Parkside — important authority on the question of what amounts to a preference when dealing with common directorships; acted for the Cayman Islands» appointed SPC Receiver in the # 100m Axiom LItigiation Funding Fraud case which involved the first case of a SPC Receiver being recognised
under the Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations 2006; has recently advised on several schemes of arrangement; regularly advises on recovery of assets in an insolvency context using the transaction avoidance rules.
Declaratory judgment action included
claims against insurer for alleged violation of consumer protection law, in addition to
dispute over the insurer's reasons for denying coverage for the stock option backdating
claims under applicable policy definitions and exclusions.
Represented the Republic of Uruguay before the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment
Disputes in defense of
claims brought by Philip Morris International
under the Uruguay - Switzerland bilateral investment treaty concerning Uruguay's tobacco control regulations.