The long answer is that, it is true that the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) initially decided in July 2013 that modification
of helmets with third -
party after - market add - ons, such as impact sensors installed inside a helmet or to its exterior, would be
viewed as voiding the helmet manufacturer's certification, and that the certification could only be regained if the helmet was retested by the manufacturer with the add - on, NOCSAE later issued a press release
clarifying that position: Instead
of automatically voiding the certification, NOCSAE decided it would leave it up to helmet manufacturers to decide whether a particular third -
party add - on affixed to the helmet, such as a impact sensor, voided its certification
of compliance with NOCSAE's standard, and now allows companies which make add - on products for football helmets to make their own certification
of compliance with the NOCSAE standards on a helmet model, as long as the certification is done according to NOCSAE standards, and as long as the manufacturer assumes responsibility (in other words, potential legal liability) for the helmet / add - on combination.
«It also
clarified that on the advice
of the governor that all shades
of views on how to resolve the recurring crisis between Share and Tsaragi, including, if need be, the application
of the concept
of «give and take», it is painful that such advice is seen by some
party in the dispute as «threatening land owners,» when in fact the governor expressed the same
view when he had peace talks with the people
of Share after the session with the people
of Tsaragi.»
In order to
clarify matters, it is the Council's
view that all documents
of the strata corporation belong to the strata corporation and thus only a strata council may determine whether a particular document is complete and accurate to its satisfaction, and whether it may be provided to authorized
parties.