This is often necessary to explain the process to lay litigants and to
clarify points of law and the relevance of evidence.
Not exact matches
• Article 95.2, that
points the competence
of the High Court to unify doctrine, the Constitutional court
clarifies that this competence doesn't limit the possibility to be regulated for the Organic
Law about Power
of Attorney to regulate that in every historic moment the jurisdictional function is up to the High Court, and therefore what is
pointed in the autonomy statute is not qualification.
Just to
clarify on one
point: «The by -
law as amended is currently the subject
of a court challenge by anti-Olympics protesters, supported by the B.C. Civil Liberties Association.»
The provisions
of CPR 57.7 which requires that the claim form contains a statement
of the claimants» and defendants» interest in the estate is a useful starting
point but this case
clarifies that this is in fact a substantive
law point rather than a simply procedural issue.
However, in Rickard, the Court
of Appeal has now
clarified the
law on this
point by concluding that a twenty - first century application
of the statutory power to appoint a receiver by way
of equitable execution should not preclude that receiver's appointment over a legal interest in the property
of a judgment debtor.
Let's start with a quick recap
of a
point that can't be
clarified enough: Owned media is all the branding and marketing messages your
law firm creates and delivers through channels you own.
Moreover, this could also be an appropriate test case for the Supreme Court to
clarify that the principles set out in National Bank
of Canada v. RCIU (the case cited by the hyperbolic Bruce Pardy) do not apply to lawyers, either in their personal or professional capacities, and that Lavigne and Green together stand for the principle that not only is there no right «not to associate» in Canadian
law, there is also no right «not to speak» when it comes to lawyers, contrary to the misapprehension of those who are shocked and amazed that the Law Society can require them to adopt a «Statement of Principles» that will, as the supporting legal opinion points out, make their «generic human rights obligations» more «personal... tangible... and readily accessible.&raq
law, there is also no right «not to speak» when it comes to lawyers, contrary to the misapprehension
of those who are shocked and amazed that the
Law Society can require them to adopt a «Statement of Principles» that will, as the supporting legal opinion points out, make their «generic human rights obligations» more «personal... tangible... and readily accessible.&raq
Law Society can require them to adopt a «Statement
of Principles» that will, as the supporting legal opinion
points out, make their «generic human rights obligations» more «personal... tangible... and readily accessible.»
«This bill makes
clarifying changes to current
law to ensure that various forms
of alternative currency such as digital currency,
points, coupons, or other objects
of monetary value do not violate the
law when those methods are used for the purchase
of goods and services or the transmission
of payments.»