Slade ruled that First Nations could be classified as a band and therefore could meet the test for
class certification under the Indian Act as members of a shared culture with similar interests.
Not exact matches
These are given
under the pretense that the teacher will eventually take all of the required courses for valid
certification (so the teacher must take
classes outside of work while they are teaching).
Under the conditions specified by the
certification rules the S -
Class as a full hybrid generates 69 g CO2 per kilometre.
«We are thrilled to announce the
certification under American Humane Conservation of Woodland Park Zoo, a world -
class institution dedicated to the responsible, humane treatment of the remarkable animals in its care,» said American Humane President and CEO Dr. Robin Ganzert.
Thus, the Plaintiff satisfied four parts of the five - part test for
certification under s. 5 (1) of the
Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6 (the «Act»).
For
class actions in particular, the Court pointed out that Congress also has provided the remedy of enlarged removal jurisdiction
under CAFA, and that, once in federal court,
class actions may be transferred and consolidated in one court, and that «we would expect federal courts to apply principles of comity to each other's
class certification decisions when addressing a common dispute.»
In response to the policy argument against allowing relitigation of
class certification, the Court noted that stare decisis and comity are the legal system's remedies for repetitive litigation that falls outside of the rules of preclusion, and that once a class action is removed to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), 28 U.S
class certification, the Court noted that stare decisis and comity are the legal system's remedies for repetitive litigation that falls outside of the rules of preclusion, and that once a
class action is removed to federal court under the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), 28 U.S
class action is removed to federal court
under the
Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), 28 U.S
Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 (CAFA), 28 U.S.C.??
A request for
class - action
certification was
under consideration.
In rejecting this point, Justice Perell held that the internal administrative process established by the Code is subsumed by the «preferable procedure» requirement for
certification under Ontario's
Class Proceedings Act.
Theses rulings will impact standing concepts and jurisdictional challenges, liability
under the WARN and the ERISA, appeals of
class certification decisions, challenges to EEOC administrative subpoenas, and rules on American Pipe tolling and application of statute of limitations in
class actions.
Successfully represented secondary - market purchaser of mortgage loans in interlocutory appeal of district court decision denying
certification of a
class under Fair Housing Act
In certifying the
class action against the settling defendants, Perell J. noted that even in situations where certification is sought for settlement purposes, all of the criteria for certification under s. 5 (1) of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6 must still be met (though compliance with the criteria is not as strictly required because of the different circumstances associated with settleme
class action against the settling defendants, Perell J. noted that even in situations where
certification is sought for settlement purposes, all of the criteria for
certification under s. 5 (1) of the
Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6 must still be met (though compliance with the criteria is not as strictly required because of the different circumstances associated with settleme
Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. 6 must still be met (though compliance with the criteria is not as strictly required because of the different circumstances associated with settlements).
The Eighth Circuit granted discretionary appellate review
under Rule 23 (f) and reversed both the order on the motion to dismiss and the
class certification ruling, remanding with direction to dismiss the complaint.
Second, allowing this type of appeal would be contrary to the purpose and intent of Rule 23 (f) and its enabling statutes,
under which appeals from
class certification orders may be heard only in the discretion of the court of appeals.
In order for the group health plan to disclose protected health information to a plan sponsor, the plan documents
under which the plan was established and is maintained must be amended to: (1) Describe the permitted uses and disclosures of protected health information; (2) specify that disclosure is permitted only upon receipt of a
certification from the plan sponsor that the plan documents have been amended and the plan sponsor has agreed to certain conditions regarding the use and disclosure of protected health information; and (3) provide adequate firewalls to: identify the employees or
classes of employees who will have access to protected health information; restrict access solely to the employees identified and only for the functions performed on behalf of the group health plan; and provide a mechanism for resolving issues of noncompliance.
Pro-Sys sought
certification of the action as a
class proceeding
under British Columbia's...
[1] Lorne Waldman moves for
certification of a proposed
class action under the Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c.
class action
under the
Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c.
Class Proceedings Act, 1992, S.O. 1992, c. C. 6.
Under the amendments, if a proceeding was certified prior to the coming into force of the amendments, a party may apply to amend the
certification order to include non-residents as members of the
class.
The question considered was whether,
under Smith, federal judges must afford «comity» to each other's orders denying
class certification.
To place, carve and finish amalgam restorations
under the direct supervision of a dentist, a dental assistant must: (1) Be at least 18 years of age, AND (2) Hold current DANB CDA
certification or have been employed as a dental assistant with a minimum of two years (4,000 hours) hands - on experience, AND (3) Take and pass a pre-examination on basic dental procedures and techniques, as well as the basic fundamentals of dentistry, AND (4) Complete a 40 - hour course given by an approved continuing education sponsor and taught in an institution with a CODA - accredited dental, dental hygiene or dental assisting program, AND (5) Pass an exam that is psychometrically sound, such as a combination of DANB's Anatomy, Morphology and Physiology (AMP), Isolation (IS) and Restorative Functions (RF) exam, or equivalent *, AND (6) Maintain proof of BLS
certification A supervising dentist must attend a required orientation
class with the applicant and sign an agreement that he or she will follow the required guidelines regarding supervision and clinical application of specific techniques being taught between scheduled
classes.
Requirements to maintain
certification through continuing education
classes are currently
under review by the SLCC.