It says Mr Brown's disastrous decision to abolish the 10p starting rate of tax, which alienated many working
class Labour supporters, stemmed from his desire to pander to Mr Murdoch.
Mann's idea appears to be squarely aimed at middle -
class Labour supporters residing in London.
It makes sense that working -
class Labour supporters might be especially likely to prioritise the issue.
Not exact matches
Tom -
Labour's working
class supporters were large monarchist.
Labour lost because they: a) broke manifold electoral promises b) lied shamelessly to the people and parliament c) engaged in industrial - scale corruption and lame cover - up d) wilfully enraged their newest
supporters e) eschewed democracy at every opportunity f) treated the electorate like idiots g) alienated a vast constituency of voters with strong personal interest in the well - being of our servicemen h) inherited the most benign of economies and recklessly maxed out the public debt i) devoted inordinate time and effort to policies based on immature
class war antics j) engaged in open internal dissent while being too cowardly to take any definitive action k) offered a wholly negative electoral campaign Unless confidence is restored in these areas,
Labour will continue to be despised.
In traditional working
class areas, the story that
Labour betrayed its
supporters is now gospel.
The idea that UKIP are picking up old
Labour supporters is also not supported by evidence on the social
class of their intended voters.
A majority in the
Labour movement believe the party lost the election because its traditional core
supporters decided not to vote
Labour, not because middle
class swing voters went to other parties.
During the 1950s and early 1960s, it also became increasingly unpopular amongst
Labour supporters and politicians, who argued that the system reinforced
class division and the privileges of the middle
classes, who dominated the grammar schools.
It's not a good look: the evasive tactics, the actions which require decoding by political journalists to find their meaning, the use of managerial terms like «stakeholder» — this all reflects the problems
Labour had in the past, where professional middle -
class politicians conducted themselves in a way which alienated the party's
supporters.
For some of
Labour's core white working
class supporters, a defence of an outward - looking Britain would be seen as precisely the metropolitan elitism Farage is so adept at criticising.
Until the party and its leadership can admit to the mistakes made in government, or to the lack of courage shown in not tackling the clear problems that prevent ordinary people from enjoying the sort of life that the middle
classes take for granted, then I fear a whole swathe of
Labour supporters will simply choose not to vote
Labour, whatever promises are made at the next election (this is essentially ditching the last vestiges of New
Labour I suppose).
They are of a higher social
class than Tory and
Labour supporters, with more ABs and fewer DEs.
These are people that need to be properly engaged with if
Labour has any ambitions of securing a majority however properly engaging and pandering to their views when wrong or speaking about labour supporters as if they're a different classes of people are not the same
Labour has any ambitions of securing a majority however properly engaging and pandering to their views when wrong or speaking about
labour supporters as if they're a different classes of people are not the same
labour supporters as if they're a different
classes of people are not the same thing.
There are old
Labour supporters who see Ukip nibbling into the party's working -
class base in the north of England and urge tougher positions in response.
Crudely put, Britain is increasingly Southern and middle
class; for
Labour to win they need to appeal to southern, middle
class voters as well as their traditional working
class supporters.
In asking
Labour / former
Labour supporters of their views on a number of issues they categorised those
supporters by asking, «Which of the following do you think best reflects that the
Labour Party should stand for»: «anti capitalist»; «representing the working
class»; «building a fairer society».
If
labour lose certain seats we've got because the White working
class, self employed man, witha St George's flag outside ina council home votes UKIP are you going to say it doesn't matter as that sort of chav stereotype, is something that we as
labour supporters shouldnt want anyway
Ed had been able to get across the worry a lot of Core
labour voters have about immigration concerning work, and not be shouted down as a racist by the likes of Diane Abbott, the way other
labour supporters like lord Glasman or rod Liddle have in the past, when as Liddle pointed out lately, it's the rich bosses employing Eastern European workers that have financially benefitted, not the working
class, and the mess Cameron has made over Junkter, is nothing to the failure of Ed, to score over Andy Coulson scandal,
Suppose there is no
Labour candidate, then
Labour supporters will be tempted to vote UKIP, and once they get the taste for rebellion, they might well stick with UKIP, like many of the working
class are doing these days, and they'll be lost for good.