Sentences with phrase «class men in»

How intriguing that it came from working class men in 1873?!

And it's also rare to hear in church — because there aren't enough working class men in our pews.

As it is a cornerstone of any fashionistas wardrobe.Its hard to believe its popularity exploded from a rivet reinforced work pant, designed for the working class man in 1873.

Not exact matches

They offer classes in personal responsibility and accountability, they teach men to forgive themselves and to forgive the people who perpetrated them as children because they all grew up surrounded by bad influences.

«Trousers are for older boys and men, whereas shorts on younger boys are one of the silent class markers that we have in England.

These men are truly in a class of their own and, incidentally, share some common traits:

Additionally, student newspaper The Daily Tar Heel reports, the new report «found clear evidence that academic counselors from the football, men's basketball and women's basketball teams asked for players to be enrolled in bogus independent study classes in order for them to be eligible.»

What with a doctor dragged screaming and kicking off a plane, another person in first class threatened with handcuffs if he didn't leave his seat for someone of «higher priority,» or the man reportedly stung by a scorpion that fell on him from an overhead bin.

About three quarters of the men in the class — and it was all men and all white men — had served in the war.

How conscious were the men that there were no women in the class?

What's more, she noticed the men in her classes came with a knowledge base she lacked

It got her thinking: All of those men in her classes grew up playing with Legos.

One man is giving travelers the ultimate scavenger hunt: Find him in any airport and he'll give you his first or business class seat.

Lee sat in business class, about six rows behind the two men.

Her ever - present Moleskine notebook in her lap, she looked like a student taking notes in class and was sometimes shouted over and patronized by the older men on the panel.

«What's a 48 - year old man with 4 kids like me doing in a Pure Barre class?

Daniels said she was with her infant daughter and headed to a fitness class when a man approached her in the parking lot.

Although you will usually find a majority of women in our classes, we have a lot of men who attend regular classes and see great results.

Markets are the greatest wealth creator in the history of man, and over any 10 year period in history, stocks have outperformed every other asset class.

Many studios periodically host «Bring on the Men» classes where clients are encouraged to bring their special men in their life (husband, boyfriend, brother, dad, friend, etc.) to class to find out what Pure Barre is all aboMen» classes where clients are encouraged to bring their special men in their life (husband, boyfriend, brother, dad, friend, etc.) to class to find out what Pure Barre is all abomen in their life (husband, boyfriend, brother, dad, friend, etc.) to class to find out what Pure Barre is all about.

(In middle and upper class households, of course, the man managed the money.)

It's not meant to be an attack on men, or white men, or white middle class men, but an attempt to open our eyes to perhaps perceive a little bit how we might have an advantage based on these markers, such as higher wages than women in the same line of work.

This is a tough young man, wrestling in a light weight class, who probably would have decked her pretty quick.

Notice the rural, working - class focus, as well as on the difficulties in being a man in full when all the key relational institutions — beginning with the family — are broken.

The path to true financial security for a woman in the U.S. quite often entails getting breast implants and selling herself to the man with a 6 - series bmw or s - class benz, then divorcing him and taking his money.

He was a Christian man, he ran a Bible class, and he was killed in the Battle of the Somme.

Perhaps, as some argue, Trump channels the anxieties of a class whose economic and social standing is in demonstrable decline as a cynical ploy to win popularity — this is a man who once called the poor «morons» — while winking at the «establishment,» who can take comfort in knowing that this reality - television caricature of themselves actually shares their political opportunism, if not their economic values.

If Warfield is not concerned with Catholicism, then why in his discussion of the kind of «faith healing» promoted by men like A. J. Gordon does he claim that it creates a class of «professionals» who stand between the soul and God and that «from this germ the whole sacerdotal evil has grown»?

It was already present in the famous Code of Hammurabi, from the 18th century BCE: «If an upper - class man should blind the eye of another upper - class man, they shall blind his eye,» and so on through breaking bones, knocking out teeth, etc..

The face of addiction a generation ago was that of the working - class or upper - middle - class man, probably long and intimately known to his neighbors, who stood up at an AA meeting in a church basement and bluntly said, «Hi, I'm X, and I'm an alcoholic.»

Nat privileged me by asking me to introduce him at that event, where I lauded him as «a superb writer and first - class public intellectual,... a man of consistent, steadfast principle; a moral purist in an age of hand - wringing accommodationists.»

But the roots of caste can be traced back to a story in the most ancient Hindu scriptures, the Vedas, in which the various social classes are produced from the sacrifice of a primordial man — the priestly class from the mouth, the warrior class from the arms, the merchant class from the thighs, the laboring class from the feet (Rig Veda 90:10).

If the Christ paradigm offers salvation to the rich via his identification with the oppressed masses in their struggle for justice, this route must really mean a greater enrichment of experience for that rich man than, let us say, the enjoyment of good books and music which the continued leisure of the upper class could have afforded him.

Insofar as God can evoke in the poor man an intelligent love for his class brothers, he will achieve an intensity of experience otherwise not possible, as he enjoys by anticipation his role in the creation of a new, non-exploitative wealth.

No matter, as Mulqueen explains: «Telling men they have to wear a jacket and tie may make them feel unwelcome, but that person [he means men] is not in a legally protected class.»

Of course, no one disputes that Santa, Christ / God and all figures powerful and noble were / are men which, of course, justifies women's second class status in virtually all corners of the earth.

Indeed my basic position is that for the understanding of human behavior in society the whole controversy as to whether material conditions (appetites, interests, «drives,» or in Marxist terms, the «means of production» and the consequent «class struggle») cause men to act is at bottom pointless and unprofitable.

It's also important for those of us who have grown weary of being treated like second - class Kingdom citizens to be reminded of the fact that there are indeed many Christian men out there who support and celebrate women in the Church.

For example, he declares that St. Thomas's assertion that the poor man was justified in stealing must now be more widely applied to classes and nations: «The proletarian nations have a claim on the goods of the rich nation next door.»

It is in the fourth stage that religion comes into prominence because city life exposes men to all kinds of temptations arising from the ample leisure and wealth of the richer classes.

In one remarkably progressive instance, the New York Moral Reform Society (NYMRS) published an article in their newsletter — the Advocate of Moral Reform — calling out the double standard between men and women in terms of sex, mainly that men were allowed to have it whenever where - ever, but if a woman worked as a prostitute (pretty much her only option for many lower class impoverished women), then she was the lowest of the loIn one remarkably progressive instance, the New York Moral Reform Society (NYMRS) published an article in their newsletter — the Advocate of Moral Reform — calling out the double standard between men and women in terms of sex, mainly that men were allowed to have it whenever where - ever, but if a woman worked as a prostitute (pretty much her only option for many lower class impoverished women), then she was the lowest of the loin their newsletter — the Advocate of Moral Reform — calling out the double standard between men and women in terms of sex, mainly that men were allowed to have it whenever where - ever, but if a woman worked as a prostitute (pretty much her only option for many lower class impoverished women), then she was the lowest of the loin terms of sex, mainly that men were allowed to have it whenever where - ever, but if a woman worked as a prostitute (pretty much her only option for many lower class impoverished women), then she was the lowest of the low.

The Bible itself placed men and animals in the same category by describing their Creation on the same day and thus distinguishing them as a class from all other created forms of life.

I suppose unless I'm already a believer I will need to pay a believer a nice sum of money in order and take a class in order to understand why a covenant that carries the penalty of death if this god is not worshipped is changed because, help me here (well of course unless god can speak for himself - I guess I have to ask those who have studied his word that he gave only once 2000 years ago to another culture), so after this covenant he came down and became a man in order to give people grace so he doesn't kill them if they don't worship him?

It is a commitment of men and women to the supremely worshipful reality called God, as this reality is believed to disclose itself to us, but it is not an individualistic commitment, since it demands full participation, to a greater or lesser degree, in a corporate experience conveyed through the ages by a community of men and women drawn from the most varied backgrounds and races, classes, nations, and cultures.

The Council wants both sexes to cooperate responsibly in this culture, and men and women of all social classes as well as all nations, whether rich or poor, to have as active a share in it as possible through education, means of communication, tourism and so forth.

I have been taught this less by my feminist professional colleagues than by the students who have attended my classes on passes from hospitals or after therapy sessions, in which they are being treated for wounds inflicted by men (and sometimes women) who abused them as children or as adults.

I do indeed believe, but I believe as one of a great company of men and women, from many ages, of all races and classes, rich and poor, simple and learned, who in one way or another have been drawn to find the truest key to the meaning and purpose of human existence given focal expression in Jesus Christ.

When, therefore, we predicate «man» of Socrates, man is entity not in the primary but only in the secondary sense; it is a universal, a class.

Almost all Lutheran theological writing has been generated in European or North American academies — in part, the legacy of Luther's own concern for learning and education — and it has been done almost exclusively by European or (more recently) North American men among whom differences of race, economic and social class, and level of education are even less remarkable than their theological differences.

Females were 2nd class citizens in the time and region — technically property of men, and even less so educated.