Not exact matches
MH:
Because they need altogether about $ 5 trillion to create... If they're going to create 500 billionaires to run the country for the next century and to create really a new feudal class they need $ 5 trillion and they don't want the people to know what's occurring because if they did the voters would get so upset they'd create probably a new political party, an alter
Because they need altogether about $ 5 trillion to create... If they're going to create 500 billionaires to run the country for the next century and to create really a new feudal
class they need $ 5 trillion and they don't want the people to know what's occurring
because if they did the voters would get so upset they'd create probably a new political party, an alter
because if they did the
voters would get so upset they'd create probably a new political party, an alternative.
Donald Trump took over the Republican Party
because Jack Kemp's heirs had failed to prioritize the concerns of working -
class voters.
While it can never be fair to will that members of a disfavored
class - whether the unborn, the disabled, or members of some racial or religious minority group - be excluded from legal protections one wills for oneself and those dear to one, a legislator or
voter is personally responsible for no unfairness to the victims of an objectively unjust law where he supports that law precisely, and only,
because the alternative is even less protective of its victims.
I think Boesner would run second in
voters minds
because he's a great kid with a world
class shot, he's American, and he will challenge for the RR trophy for some time.
However, Polish
voters have given this social program the benefit of the doubt
because PiS, unlike their chief opponents, have not been identified with the new
class of economic and political aristocracy.
Labour lost
because they: a) broke manifold electoral promises b) lied shamelessly to the people and parliament c) engaged in industrial - scale corruption and lame cover - up d) wilfully enraged their newest supporters e) eschewed democracy at every opportunity f) treated the electorate like idiots g) alienated a vast constituency of
voters with strong personal interest in the well - being of our servicemen h) inherited the most benign of economies and recklessly maxed out the public debt i) devoted inordinate time and effort to policies based on immature
class war antics j) engaged in open internal dissent while being too cowardly to take any definitive action k) offered a wholly negative electoral campaign Unless confidence is restored in these areas, Labour will continue to be despised.
The constitutional bill is firmly anchored in the will of the people
because (a) the bill fully reflects the declaration of the 2010 National Assembly at which every Icelander 18 years or older had an equal chance of being invited to take a seat and (b) it was approved by 2/3 of the
voters in a national referendum against the wishes of much of the discredited political
class.
They're trying to sway leadership to leave it alone or limit it to a degree so
voters back home — particularly those in the middle
class — don't see their overall tax bills increase
because of tax reform.
A majority in the Labour movement believe the party lost the election
because its traditional core supporters decided not to vote Labour, not
because middle
class swing
voters went to other parties.
Sarkozy, a fan of George W Bush, reportedly did not choose the name to copy the US, but rather
because his pollsters advised him that acronyms had fallen from favour among
voters who are increasingly distrustful of the political
class.
A 27 year old college freshmen who runs for office as a
class project and is forced onto the conservative column
because the republican party won't let him, they'd rather kruger ran unapposed, and gets 27 % of the vote says that 27 % of the
voters are telling kruger they are unhappy with him.
The Democratic Party failed to retain the presidency and make electoral gains last year
because they didn't give
voters «anything to vote for» in November and failed to boost middle
class issues, Gov. Andrew Cuomo said at a fundraiser on Monday night.
Bassetlaw MP John Mann said that white working
class voters and trade unionists had already deserted the party for Ukip,
because of Labour's support for immigration.
Nick Robinson thinks Alan Johnson will be missed: «Alan Johnson was picked for the job
because the former postman who rose to be his union's leader and then a cabinet minister could connect with the working
class voters Labour had lost touch with and yet was a Blairite who worried about government spending too much.
«White ethnics, middle
class voters, independents — the real heart of the Bloomberg and Giuliani days — either didn't vote for him or did
because de Blasio's rivals were so uninspiring or they were tired of Bloomberg,» said Dan Gerstein, a political consultant and analyst.
I think in fairness to Steve Hart, Unite's strategy makes union backed candidates from a broader social background part of their political strategy, but certainly not the end of it: At the Unite meeting at Labour Conference, Jon Trickett & Len McCluskey made the case for Unite & Labour developing MP's from down to earth backgrounds, but linked this very much to having policies that adress the needs of working
class voters: The Unite strategy is fairly broad, including recruitng union members to Labour, developing MP's (who as McCluskey are backed
because they «reflect the values of the union movement» — rather than just being from a particular social
class), and supporting the
CLASS think tank to develop policy — I did a write up of this meeting for the Morning Star (and a rival Progress one), which may be of interest (I think it will appear if you click on my name)
For a start you're not questioning why working
class socialist labour
voters went Ukip in the first place, it wasn't some guardian reading, snobbery that the working
class are think, therefore are bigoted, so they must vote UKIP as they're nasty right wingers who dint like immigration, the decrease in wages among blue collar workers, due to immigration, is by the bosses seeking immigration to pay lower wages to make themselves more profits, Appeasing implies going along with something through fear of something worse, to agree with controlling immigration,
because ex labour
voters are going UKIP isn't appeasing it, why would us being afraid of losing is our votes to.
This is not
because Labour support rose among middle -
class (ABC1)--
voters.
I understand that Question 2 is attempting to expand charters so that they can include more middle
class and upper - middle
class families, but those
voters are unaware of how charters might benefit them
because already existing Massachusetts charters have largely failed to serve them.