Classic circular reasoning!
objective morality, when used as «evidence» of the existence of god is
classic circular reasoning; «I believe in god because of the existence of objective morality and I believe in objective morality because I believe in god.
That is
classic circular reasoning.
Not exact matches
In other words, the theory that is itself the most important supporting pillar for the modernist system is itself supported by that very system, in a
classic example of
circular reasoning.
So I asked her how she knew pet overpopulation was real in spite of the data and experience that proved otherwise, and she gave me the tautology that pet overpopulation is real because shelters are killing them, a logical fallacy, backward and
circular reasoning, and a
classic example of an after - the - fact justification.