Not only does it seem that modern industry is at odds with classical virtue, but
the classical idea of a virtuous citizenry seems to fit uneasily with modern ideas about the equality of persons.
One can not prove anything by assuming the logical coherence of
the classical idea of an ens realissimum or unsurpassable actuality, for this coherence is in no way known or knowable.
The classical idea of God's perfection is indeed problematic.
One was
the classical idea of the perfection of God, which held that since God was perfect God must be unchangeable (and therefore unaffected in any real sense by the affairs of this world).
One would be to insist — as Plantinga does in his reply to the Basingers» article (PS 11:25 - 29)-- that they are concerned only with showing that admitting the existence of evil is not inconsistent with adherence to a «C» - omnipotent
classical idea of God.
But if it were accepted, would there be anything left of
the classical idea of God as omnipotent besides the term?
Instead of promoting industrial capitalism, financial interests within the U.S. and European economies have sponsored a post-industrial counter-revolution against
the classical idea of free markets, that is, markets free of unearned land rent, monopoly rent and financial interest and fees.
He often incorporates plinths or pedestals into pieces, examining
classical ideas of presentation and the relationship to where the piece begins or ends.
Not exact matches
That
idea was traumatized by Marxism pushing
classical political economy to its logical conclusion — to free capitalism from the carry - overs
of the feudal epoch
of landlordism, predatory finance and the monopolies that money - lenders obtained from governments.
The
idea of Jesus arose like so many other religious and mythical figures, particularly
Classical Greece, and just as the Greek gods were revered and accepted as real, so too is this Jesus Christ figure.
Ideas, thoughts, as well as deeper emotional or «affective» states, are included in this category where the
classical writers would place meditation, contemplation, and the various stages
of «union with God» about which the mystics have given us reports.
Indeed, the
classical Aristotelian nature and the Christian
idea of the human being as body and soul united as an indivisible and integrated whole are excluded from the outset.
In one popular study
of the problem
of God today, John A. T. Robinson questions the relevance
of a theism that would think
of God as a heavenly, completely perfect person who resides above the world and mankind.4 The same issue is raised by Harvey Cox, who writes: The willingness
of the
classical philosophers to allow the God
of the Bible to be blurred into Plato's
Idea of the Good or Aristotle's Prime Mover was fatal.
In Akkadian, the language
of classical Mesopotamia, the same word was used to express the
idea of faith in God or another person and the act
of issuing a loan.
But any
classical theists who admit that their belief is only the most plausible conclusion based on the evidence available must regard this difficulty as another bit
of evidence against their
idea.
The Cartesian order is highly suited to the
idea of contiguous connection in
classical physics.
A variety
of problems have been raised from a
classical Christian perspective regarding non-trinitarian conceptions
of God, including the problems
of creation, salvation, divine self - consciousness, God's relation to the eternal
ideas and to Creativity, and religious adequacy.
Although this
idea of God differs from
classical notions, two principal advantages should not be overlooked.
(6) And finally,
classical theism is marked by an erroneous conception
of infallible revelation according to which, «The
idea of revelation is the
idea of special knowledge
of God, or
of religious truth, possessed by some people and transmitted by them to others» (OOTM 5).
The attack has frequently been directed at the
idea of liberal education itself, apart from its
classical form.
Alston quotes a passage from Man's Vision
of God which he takes to imply that if one rejects any
of the propositions
of classical theism one must reject them all, since they are «inseparable aspects
of one
idea.»
Classical theism did not really conceptualize the
idea of a God who «is love.
There we find, in the
classical atomic theory, the first appearance
of the
idea that space is a neutral insulator; and at about the same time, the antithetic view that it is a perfect superconductor.
«63 The method was apologetic: the Christian view was set in opposition to the
classical Greek view (meaning for history is found in a changeless realm
of ideas) and the modern view (both time and history are self - explanatory).
But in Beyond Humanism and elsewhere he expresses the
idea that the new conception
of God is not only philosophically superior to that
of classical philosophies and theologies, it is also theologically and religiously more adequate in that it is much more compatible with the Biblical
idea of God as love.
Instead
of rejecting every
idea of an active and acting God when she rejects
classical theism, Sölle might profit from approaching empirically the working
of grace as Wieman did.
Classical Greek philosophers, about 500 BC, formalized the concept
of «Destiny» through stories anthropomorphizing the
idea of «fate».
In this scheme the quantifiers «all,» «some,» and «none» are combined with the
ideas of «absolute perfection,» «relative perfection,» and «imperfection'to produce seven different conceptions
of deity which are conveniently grouped into three broad types
of theism:
classical theism, within which God is conceived as absolutely perfect in all respects and in no way surpassable; atheistic views, in which there is no being which is in any respect perfect or unsurpassable; and the «new theism,» in which God is in some respects perfect and unsurpassable by others but is surpassable by himself.
Because
of your misunderstandings
of the
classical / metaphysical
idea of matter, your argument fails to hit home.
In «Deity, Monarchy and Metaphysics» Williams explains Whitehead's moral and metaphysical objections to the coercive God
of classical theology.102 In its place Whitehead proposes an
idea of God consistent with the biblical insight that «the highest goods are realized only through persuasion.»
The
idea of a change in God was anathema to
classical theists because it was viewed as a kind
of metaphysical virus that infects the whole
of the divine reality; if God is in any sense contingent, then the very existence
of God is contingent.
The Judeo - Christian
idea of a transcendent source
of all value is consonant with these
classical insights.
The Biblical gospel has burst the bonds even
of classical mythology, as may be seen from what happened to the
idea of the Logos; but it has done so only by first taking that mythology up and using it.
gave rise to the Hindu Upanishads and to Buddhism in India, to the religions
of Lao - Tzu and Confucius in China, to the eschatological
ideas of Zoroaster in Persia, to the
classical biblical prophets in Israel and Judah, and to the philosophy
of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle in the Greek world.
The
classical world view leaves open the door for the
idea of transcendence.
The very naïveté
of the
classical mythology, on the other hand, which provided the environment for the New Testament, expresses that openness for the
idea of transcendence.
I have no
idea where we will all be a hundred years from now, but if there is a
classical music in which the American experience has finally discovered the voice
of its own complexity, it will owe much
of its direction to the achievements
of Edward William Ellington.
Whitehead himself, unlike Hartshorne and Ogden, repudiates the deductive method and the demonstrative claims
of classical rationalism and, rather, attempts to arrive at a metaphysical system that will bring a consistent meaning and coherence to the critical
ideas, mostly scientific,
of his own time and world.
In brief, my response to this fundamental affirmation
of liberal Protestantism would he that the
idea of the ultimate value and reality
of the individual is historically limited to the
classical period
of modern Western culture, and that it can have neither a living meaning nor a truly human form in a post-modern or post-liberal period
of history.
A
classical author should impress the readers
of the following generations by the wealth
of his
ideas, and the fertileness
of their formulation.
Following this
classical tradition, virtually all branches
of the Church stress the
idea that baptism implies membership in the body
of the Christ, the Church, an entrance into a brother / sisterhood, a communion, fellowship
of all in the spirit
of the Christ.
In the
classical literature the requirement
of love is based on still another
idea, which Seneca clearly expresses in the brief words: «Man is for man something holy.»
Classical theism is a beautiful way
of thinking about thinking, and for those who are passionate about pure thought, there is no
idea more beautiful than the
idea that God is like our
ideas.
The
classical Christian
idea of an aloof, immutable, independent God, representing simplicity and rest, he argues, has much more in common with certain philosophical abstractions inherited from the Greeks.
The «
classical»,
idea of effective interactions was that
of simple material causality, with one or two causes producing one or two effects in a simple linear manner.
To summarize this lengthy discussion - as best as I can see it, Dubose rooted his missional
ideas in the
idea of a sending, «missionary» church, while Van Engen based his
ideas on the
classical understanding
of «mission.»
«By and large, a rich and complex
idea [i.e., the virtue
of patience] that was consistently employed for almost two thousand years to represent the highest possibilities
of human life, both in the
classical and the Christian traditions, has been allowed to wither away.»
I have shown that the strong assertion
of individual equality in America took place against the background
of religious hierarchical
ideas — the Christian conception
of divine / human relations — and
classical philosophy, as in the
idea of natural law, also ultimately hierarchical.
In a profound survey
of the history
of the discussion
of love in biblical,
classical, and Christian sources he concluded agape was the central Christian
idea.
The world
of classical Greece and Rome was prepared to accept the
idea that our souls might journey to heaven, for heaven is the native climate
of the immaterial soul.