The classical idea of God's perfection is indeed problematic.
One would be to insist — as Plantinga does in his reply to the Basingers» article (PS 11:25 - 29)-- that they are concerned only with showing that admitting the existence of evil is not inconsistent with adherence to a «C» - omnipotent
classical idea of God.
But if it were accepted, would there be anything left of
the classical idea of God as omnipotent besides the term?
Not exact matches
The
idea of Jesus arose like so many other religious and mythical figures, particularly
Classical Greece, and just as the Greek
gods were revered and accepted as real, so too is this Jesus Christ figure.
Ideas, thoughts, as well as deeper emotional or «affective» states, are included in this category where the
classical writers would place meditation, contemplation, and the various stages
of «union with
God» about which the mystics have given us reports.
In one popular study
of the problem
of God today, John A. T. Robinson questions the relevance
of a theism that would think
of God as a heavenly, completely perfect person who resides above the world and mankind.4 The same issue is raised by Harvey Cox, who writes: The willingness
of the
classical philosophers to allow the
God of the Bible to be blurred into Plato's
Idea of the Good or Aristotle's Prime Mover was fatal.
In Akkadian, the language
of classical Mesopotamia, the same word was used to express the
idea of faith in
God or another person and the act
of issuing a loan.
A variety
of problems have been raised from a
classical Christian perspective regarding non-trinitarian conceptions
of God, including the problems
of creation, salvation, divine self - consciousness,
God's relation to the eternal
ideas and to Creativity, and religious adequacy.
Although this
idea of God differs from
classical notions, two principal advantages should not be overlooked.
(6) And finally,
classical theism is marked by an erroneous conception
of infallible revelation according to which, «The
idea of revelation is the
idea of special knowledge
of God, or
of religious truth, possessed by some people and transmitted by them to others» (OOTM 5).
Alston quotes a passage from Man's Vision
of God which he takes to imply that if one rejects any
of the propositions
of classical theism one must reject them all, since they are «inseparable aspects
of one
idea.»
Classical theism did not really conceptualize the
idea of a
God who «is love.
One was the
classical idea of the perfection
of God, which held that since
God was perfect
God must be unchangeable (and therefore unaffected in any real sense by the affairs
of this world).
But in Beyond Humanism and elsewhere he expresses the
idea that the new conception
of God is not only philosophically superior to that
of classical philosophies and theologies, it is also theologically and religiously more adequate in that it is much more compatible with the Biblical
idea of God as love.
Instead
of rejecting every
idea of an active and acting
God when she rejects
classical theism, Sölle might profit from approaching empirically the working
of grace as Wieman did.
In this scheme the quantifiers «all,» «some,» and «none» are combined with the
ideas of «absolute perfection,» «relative perfection,» and «imperfection'to produce seven different conceptions
of deity which are conveniently grouped into three broad types
of theism:
classical theism, within which
God is conceived as absolutely perfect in all respects and in no way surpassable; atheistic views, in which there is no being which is in any respect perfect or unsurpassable; and the «new theism,» in which
God is in some respects perfect and unsurpassable by others but is surpassable by himself.
In «Deity, Monarchy and Metaphysics» Williams explains Whitehead's moral and metaphysical objections to the coercive
God of classical theology.102 In its place Whitehead proposes an
idea of God consistent with the biblical insight that «the highest goods are realized only through persuasion.»
The
idea of a change in
God was anathema to
classical theists because it was viewed as a kind
of metaphysical virus that infects the whole
of the divine reality; if
God is in any sense contingent, then the very existence
of God is contingent.
Classical theism is a beautiful way
of thinking about thinking, and for those who are passionate about pure thought, there is no
idea more beautiful than the
idea that
God is like our
ideas.
The
classical Christian
idea of an aloof, immutable, independent
God, representing simplicity and rest, he argues, has much more in common with certain philosophical abstractions inherited from the Greeks.