Although the above two skulls look quite similar, most creationists claim that the first one (ER 1470) is human, while the second (ER 1813) is
classified as an ape by the few creationists who even mention it.
Not exact matches
The two species also show other dental features that group them with later Old World monkeys and
apes, but are still different enough to be
classified as separate — and more ancient — species.
Recent humans and their fossil relatives are
classified as having thick molar enamel, one of very few dental traits that distinguish hominins from living African
apes.
View the table on the skull comparison page, which demonstrates that creationists actually find it not «easy», but horribly difficult to
classify fossils
as ape or human.
Any Indigenous person can tell you why the «
ape» comment is offensive: our mob used to be officially
classified as «flora and fauna», considered «less evolved» and not counted in the census, a history reflected in continuing prejudice about Indigenous people being «primitive».