Teacher and
classroom context effects on student achievement: Implications for teacher evaluation.
Not exact matches
Although parents and
classroom teachers work with kids in different
contexts, the same behavior management techniques can be used to great
effect.
Accordingly, and also per the research, this is not getting much better in that, as per the authors of this article as well as many other scholars, (1) «the variance in value - added scores that can be attributed to teacher performance rarely exceeds 10 percent; (2) in many ways «gross» measurement errors that in many ways come, first, from the tests being used to calculate value - added; (3) the restricted ranges in teacher effectiveness scores also given these test scores and their limited stretch, and depth, and instructional insensitivity — this was also at the heart of a recent post whereas in what demonstrated that «the entire range from the 15th percentile of effectiveness to the 85th percentile of [teacher] effectiveness [using the EVAAS] cover [ed] approximately 3.5 raw score points [given the tests used to measure value - added];» (4)
context or student, family, school, and community background
effects that simply can not be controlled for, or factored out; (5) especially at the
classroom / teacher level when students are not randomly assigned to
classrooms (and teachers assigned to teach those
classrooms)... although this will likely never happen for the sake of improving the sophistication and rigor of the value - added model over students» «best interests.»
While thousands of refugee students receive education in this integrated
context, little is known about its
effect on the lived experiences of schooling and how it shapes notions of inclusion and exclusion in the
classroom.
We examined the
effects of such instructional
contexts on diverse learners within the regular education
classroom (Goatley, Brock & Raphael, 1995; McMahon & Raphael, 1997).
In a lively mix of personal reflection and shrewd analysis, McGowan visits the sites of intellectual activity (scholarly publications, professional conferences, the
classroom, and the university) and considers the hazards of working within such institutional
contexts to
effect change outside the academy.
Results are discussed in the
context of students» experience of yearly change in
classroom environments, teachers» variable behavioral expectations and perceptions, and the need for intervention maintenance plans to support sustainment of treatment
effects.