Sentences with phrase «clean coal marketing»

In fact, I think you should send this to everyone you know, show them how ridiculous this clean coal marketing has actually become.

Not exact matches

The white paper on Electricity Market Reform has mapped out a new policy to encourage the billions of investment that we need in all three families of low carbon electricity generation — renewables, nuclear and clean coal and gas.

Keeley said the market «isn't delivering to us what we actually want,» but instead is providing a «flood of electricity from super-cheap natural gas, which is cleaner than coal but isn't really clean.»

Trump has also promised to «lift restrictions on the production» of shale, oil, natural gas and clean coal — such a move would increase the market share of fossil - fuel power, and could drive emissions up.

BEIJING (Reuters)- Automakers» latest projections for rapid growth of China's green car market have added to concerns of worsening smog as the uptake of electric vehicles powered by coal - fired grids races ahead of a switch to cleaner energy.

$ 8 billion) over first ten years for deficit reductionObeys PAYGO; Starting in 2026, 25 % of auction revenues for deficit reductionFuels and TransportationIncrease biofuels to 60 million gallons by 2030, low - carbon fuel standard of 10 % by 2010, 1 million plug» in hybrid cars by 2025, raise fuel economy standards, smart growth funding, end oil subsidies, promote natural gas drilling, enhanced oil recoverySmart growth funding, plug - in hybrids, raise fuel economy standards $ 7 billion a year for smart growth funding, plug - in hybrids, natural gas vehicles, raise fuel economy standards; offshore drilling with revenue sharing and oil spill veto, natural gas fracking disclosureCost ContainmentInternational offsetsOffset pool, banking and borrowing flexibility, soft price collar using permit reserve auction at $ 28 per ton going to 60 % above three - year - average market price» Hard» price collar between $ 12 and $ 25 per ton, floor increases at 3 % + CPI, ceiling at 5 % + CPI, plus permit reserve auction, offsets like W - MClean Air Act And StatesNot discussedOnly polluters above 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent a year, regional cap and trade suspended until 2017, EPA to set stationary source performance standards in 2016, some Clean Air Act provisions excludedOnly polluters above 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent a year, regional cap and trade pre-empted, establishes coal - fired plant performance standards, some Clean Air Act provisions excludedInternational CompetitivenessTax incentives for domestic auto industryFree allowances for trade - exposed industries, 2020 carbon tariff on importsCarbon tariff on importsReferences: Barack Obama, 2007; Barack Obama, 8/3/08; Pew Center, 6/26/09; leaked drafts of American Power Act, 5/11/10.

The sale seems to be timely: thermal coal markets have suffered with the growing number of power plants that are switching to clean - energy alternatives.

Those who want clean coal technology, more wind and solar, nuclear power, biomass and bio-fuels will have their opportunity through a new market that rewards those and other innovations in clean energy.

I know some here will decry that I am not talking about the issues because I do not try to obsfuscate with a discussion of the spot market price of coal vs long - term contracts, or use of coal in locations other than Kansas, or Al Gore's footprint, but the issue of Global Warming IS politics (non-ratification of Kyoto and negative flag - waving ads about politicians who oppose coal), it IS public relations («Clean Coal», cleanest coal - fired plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternaticoal vs long - term contracts, or use of coal in locations other than Kansas, or Al Gore's footprint, but the issue of Global Warming IS politics (non-ratification of Kyoto and negative flag - waving ads about politicians who oppose coal), it IS public relations («Clean Coal», cleanest coal - fired plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternaticoal in locations other than Kansas, or Al Gore's footprint, but the issue of Global Warming IS politics (non-ratification of Kyoto and negative flag - waving ads about politicians who oppose coal), it IS public relations («Clean Coal», cleanest coal - fired plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternaticoal), it IS public relations («Clean Coal», cleanest coal - fired plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternatiCoal», cleanest coal - fired plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternaticoal - fired plants, surface mining and mountain - top reoval rather than strip mining, etc.), and it IS about misrepresentation (Peobody framing the debate as coal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternaticoal vs NG when it is really coal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternaticoal vs every other energy source), and it IS about greed (the coal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternaticoal industry doing everything it can to scuttle every other energy alternative).

Both of these options are cost effective: by telling the power market to go someplace besides coal - and telling them to spare us the BS about future carbon capture - incentives will increase to fund clean alternatives.

When the The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity introduced their Clean Coal Carolers in 2008, we called it a» jaw - dropping train wreck of a marketing campaign.»

I stress this one deal because here is a chance to help a developing country just building a free market economy build a power grid not based on coal, but in cleaner energy.

The electricity industry already is — and has been for years — in a rapid transition away from coal and towards cleaner generation — a transition driven mainly by fundamental market forces such as lower gas prices, lower costs for wind and solar power and energy efficiency, and by state and federal policies and company planning decisions that long predated the Clean Power Plan.

Power companies are well on their way to meet the Plan's targets, thanks to the fact that the electricity industry has already started rapidly moving away from coal and towards cleaner generation — a transition driven mainly by fundamental market forces such as lower gas prices, lower costs for wind and solar power and energy efficiency, and by state and federal policies and company planning decisions that long predated the Plan.

Far from it: the power industry is already engaged in a rapid transition away from coal to cleaner generation, driven by fundamental market forces such as low gas prices and low costs for renewable energy and energy efficiency.

While this is more expensive than the current cost of market power at $ 32 / MWh, solar has no fuel costs, no risk of fuel cost increases, and no water or air pollution, coal ash clean - up, or nuclear waste costs.

As described in CoalSwarm's article on clean coal, the campaign has its roots in the coal industry's efforts to market «clean coal» or «smokeless coal» prior to World War II.

No matter how forceful industry lobbying, the market factors simply dictate that nuclear and coal power plants should be replaced by cheaper, cleaner, and safer solar and wind power.

The American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, a sector trade group, reinforced the call for swift action, filing a study it commissionedy that claims the PJM market will «lose its resilience to gas outages if coal retirements continue.&raCoal Electricity, a sector trade group, reinforced the call for swift action, filing a study it commissionedy that claims the PJM market will «lose its resilience to gas outages if coal retirements continue.&racoal retirements continue.»

This leaves coal producers increasingly reliant on a utility market that has many other (and cleaner) options for generating electricity.

Cost - conscious, the government has instead opted for high - efficiency low - emissions (HELE) coal plants and plans to market its clean coal technologies abroad in addition to implementing them at home.

1 Executive Summary 2 Scope of the Report 3 The Case for Hydrogen 3.1 The Drive for Clean Energy 3.2 The Uniqueness of Hydrogen 3.3 Hydrogen's Safety Record 4 Hydrogen Fuel Cells 4.1 Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell 4.2 Fuel Cells and Batteries 4.3 Fuel Cell Systems Durability 4.4 Fuel Cell Vehicles 5 Hydrogen Fueling Infrastructure 5.1 Hydrogen Station Hardware 5.2 Hydrogen Compression and Storage 5.3 Hydrogen Fueling 5.4 Hydrogen Station Capacity 6 Hydrogen Fueling Station Types 6.1 Retail vs. Non-Retail Stations 6.1.1 Retail Hydrogen Stations 6.1.2 Non-Retail Hydrogen Stations 6.2 Mobile Hydrogen Stations 6.2.1 Honda's Smart Hydrogen Station 6.2.2 Nel Hydrogen's RotoLyzer 6.2.3 Others 7 Hydrogen Fueling Protocols 7.1 SAE J2601 7.2 Related Standards 7.3 Fueling Protocols vs. Vehicle Charging 7.4 SAE J2601 vs. SAE J1772 7.5 Ionic Compression 8 Hydrogen Station Rollout Strategy 8.1 Traditional Approaches 8.2 Current Approach 8.3 Factors Impacting Rollouts 8.4 Production and Distribution Scenarios 8.5 Reliability Issues 9 Sources of Hydrogen 9.1 Fossil Fuels 9.2 Renewable Sources 10 Methods of Hydrogen Production 10.1 Production from Non-Renewable Sources 10.1.1 Steam Reforming of Natural Gas 10.1.2 Coal Gasification 10.2 Production from Renewable Sources 10.2.1 Electrolysis 10.2.2 Biomass Gasification 11 Hydrogen Production Scenarios 11.1 Centralized Hydrogen Production 11.2 On - Site Hydrogen Production 11.2.1 On - site Electrolysis 11.2.2 On - Site Steam Methane Reforming 12 Hydrogen Delivery 12.1 Hydrogen Tube Trailers 12.2 Tanker Trucks 12.3 Pipeline Delivery 12.4 Railcars and Barges 13 Hydrogen Stations Cost Factors 13.1 Capital Expenditures 13.2 Operating Expenditures 14 Hydrogen Station Deployments 14.1 Asia - Pacific 14.1.1 Japan 14.1.2 Korea 14.1.3 China 14.1.4 Rest of Asia - Pacific 14.2 Europe, Middle East & Africa (EMEA) 14.2.1 Germany 14.2.2 The U.K. 14.2.3 Nordic Region 14.2.4 Rest of EMEA 14.3 Americas 14.3.1 U.S. West Coast 14.3.2 U.S. East Coast 14.3.3 Canada 14.3.4 Latin America 15 Selected Vendors 15.1 Air Liquide 15.2 Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. 15.3 Ballard Power Systems 15.4 FirstElement Fuel Inc. 15.5 FuelCell Energy, Inc. 15.6 Hydrogenics Corporation 15.7 The Linde Group 15.8 Nel Hydrogen 15.9 Nuvera Fuel Cells 15.10 Praxair 15.11 Proton OnSite / SunHydro 15.11.1 Proton Onsite 15.11.2 SunHydro 16 Market Forecasts 16.1 Overview 16.2 Global Hydrogen Station Market 16.2.1 Hydrogen Station Deployments 16.2.2 Hydrogen Stations Capacity 16.2.3 Hydrogen Station Costs 16.3 Asia - Pacific Hydrogen Station Market 16.3.1 Hydrogen Station Deployments 16.3.2 Hydrogen Stations Capacity 16.3.3 Hydrogen Station Costs 16.4 Europe, Middle East and Africa 16.4.1 Hydrogen Station Deployments 16.4.2 Hydrogen Station Capacity 16.4.3 Hydrogen Station Costs 16.5 Americas 16.5.1 Hydrogen Station Deployments 16.5.2 Hydrogen Station Capacity 16.5.3 Hydrogen Station Costs 17 Conclusions 17.1 Hydrogen as a Fuel 17.2 Rollout of Fuel Cell Vehicles 17.3 Hydrogen Station Deployments 17.4 Funding Requirements 17.5 Customer Experience 17.6 Other Findings

Solar, geothermal, wind, hydro, wave and tidal power, natural gas and clean coal would compete for customers under common rules in a single market governed by carbon - adjusted pricing.

They hope to continue gaming the system by selling carbon credits of doubtful authenticity on an already corrupt market, and demanding climate reparations and technology transfers from the West, while remaining free to build their own clean modern and efficient coal / gas / nuclear / hydro energy grid.

Chair: Mr. Larry METZROTH, Vice President Analysis & Strategy, Arch Coal, United States Mr. Paul BARUYA, Market Analyst, IEA Clean Coal Centre, United Kingdom Mr. Andrew FIKKERS, Market Analysis Manager, Xstrata Coal, Australia (based on materials from Mr. Ran XING, China Managing Director, Barry Rogliano Salles, China) Open discussion Session 5 International trade - what lies in store for global hard coal trade and what fundamentals will drive developmeCoal, United States Mr. Paul BARUYA, Market Analyst, IEA Clean Coal Centre, United Kingdom Mr. Andrew FIKKERS, Market Analysis Manager, Xstrata Coal, Australia (based on materials from Mr. Ran XING, China Managing Director, Barry Rogliano Salles, China) Open discussion Session 5 International trade - what lies in store for global hard coal trade and what fundamentals will drive developmeCoal Centre, United Kingdom Mr. Andrew FIKKERS, Market Analysis Manager, Xstrata Coal, Australia (based on materials from Mr. Ran XING, China Managing Director, Barry Rogliano Salles, China) Open discussion Session 5 International trade - what lies in store for global hard coal trade and what fundamentals will drive developmeCoal, Australia (based on materials from Mr. Ran XING, China Managing Director, Barry Rogliano Salles, China) Open discussion Session 5 International trade - what lies in store for global hard coal trade and what fundamentals will drive developmecoal trade and what fundamentals will drive developments?

But China remains firmly committed to curbing its coal use and recently confirmed plans for a national carbon market to help drive the switch to cleaner energy sources.

Even without the Clean Power Plan, coal's share of national electricity generation has been in steep decline for over a decade, dropping from 49 % in 2007 to 33 % in 2015, due largely to hydraulic fracturing, which has flooded the market with cheap, lower carbon natural gas.

It also shrinks the market for coal and increases demand for cleaner - burning fuels such as natural gas, of which Exxon has huge holdings.

Filed Under: Climate policy, Energy, EU Policy, Markets, Oil, Gas & Coal, Policies, Renewables Tagged With: biomass, CCS, clean coal, climate change, coal power, energy security, energy transition, energy2030, EU energy policy, European gas market, geopolitics, LNG, natural gas, renewables, RuCoal, Policies, Renewables Tagged With: biomass, CCS, clean coal, climate change, coal power, energy security, energy transition, energy2030, EU energy policy, European gas market, geopolitics, LNG, natural gas, renewables, Rucoal, climate change, coal power, energy security, energy transition, energy2030, EU energy policy, European gas market, geopolitics, LNG, natural gas, renewables, Rucoal power, energy security, energy transition, energy2030, EU energy policy, European gas market, geopolitics, LNG, natural gas, renewables, Russia

While the mainstream media has yet to decipher fact from fiction in the «clean coal» marketing campaign, a graduate assistant at a college in Ohio managed to cap»n trade some of the comments and ads of presidentialr candidates Barack Obama and John McCain (and the erstwhile Hillary and Bill Cinton) on the role of coal and nuclear energy in their campaigns.

Prior to World War II, «clean coal» or «smokeless coal» was a marketing term used to describe anthracite and high - grade bituminous coal used for cooking and home heating.

Market Transformation One of our goals is to make clean - energy affordable and cost less than its dirty counterparts such as coal.

The European Union's Energy Roadmap to 2050 and the US Environmental Protection Agency's recent Clean Power Plan show that the construction of new coal plants will be severely constrained in Western markets.

In addition to the local impact on marine life and coastlines in the Northwest, building the Bellingham coal terminal and others like it would provide access to the vast Asian market for big coal companies in the U.S. that are losing domestic market share to cleaner - burning natural gas and green energy.

It unleashes market forces that will punish coal use and incentivise clean innovation.

All the examples we need are the subsidies and tax credits and laws and rules that favor renewable energy that can not compete in a fair and honest market and can not deliver a reasonable fraction of their capacity, that suck up our tax money that should be used to promote Nuclear and Clean Coal.

But the idea of «clean coal» — particularly as it has been marketed by industry — remains controversial among groups that are unsure if CCS will work and argue «clean coal» is still not as clean as alternative forms of solar or wind energy.

From the «Could» a, would» a, should» a» Comment Department: we might note that it was by using a classic interference with the market that the fossil fuel industry promoted dirty fuels — it worked to hide the true cost accounting of coal and all carbon fuels - and even funded the political suppression of clean energy — wind and solar.

But without the Clean Power Plan, the market incentive to invest in clean coal disappears, she aClean Power Plan, the market incentive to invest in clean coal disappears, she aclean coal disappears, she added.

Conservatives are in a bit of an awkward position in that they support subsidies for «clean coal» (coal with carbon capture and sequestration) and nuclear power, but neither is competitive on today's energy markets.

â $ ¨ In the end, the market will decide which is the better performer, dirty coal - fired power or clean wind and solar.