Perhaps we can get this Virginia prosecutor to go after the clean coal sector's research records on zero - emission
clean coal projects, now that the persecution of Michael Mann has been suspended by a Virginia court?.
Clean coal projects depend on Department of Energy funding because banks aren't enthusiastic about making loans to back such expensive, unproven technology, Bloomberg reported in July.
Southern Company has been making a lot of the right moves in my opinion from abandoning
the Clean Coal Project to looking to position themselves as a clean energy company.
As for the Kemper
Clean Coal project the company decided to scrap the project and instead decided to turn it into a natural gas powered facility.
During January 2011 it was also announced that U.S. based Peabody Coal, China Huaneng Group and Calera Corporation agreed to pursue the development of
a clean coal project in the Xilinguole Region of Mongolia.
Rud — I asked this previously — Have you seen any actual or estimated marginal cost numbers on Southern's
Clean Coal Project?
FutureGen, a $ 1.5 billion
clean coal project headed up by the federal government and private power companies, will announce the location of its cleaner power plant as early as Tuesday.
Earlier this year, the company abandoned work on a high - profile
clean coal project, and Georgia regulators will meet this week to decide whether the utility can finish work on a long - delayed nuclear project.
The bad news is that such retrofitting is even more economically and technologically challenging than building a FutureGen
clean coal project from square one.
Not exact matches
Its first step: a massive «
clean coal»
project.
Cuomo has pushed in recent years to adopt new efforts aimed at reducing emissions and shifting the state toward the majority use of
clean and renewable power in the coming years, including an effort to close
coal - burning power plants by 2020, promoting offshore wind
projects and developing a
clean energy standard to have the state on 50 percent renewable energy by 2030.
In a major blow to the government's plans to develop «
clean»
coal technology (where fossil fuels are burnt and the emissions stored underground), the company have postponed the
project.
Yet John Thompson, director of the fossil transition
project at the
Clean Air Task Force, said Kemper still could open the door for CO2 capture with countries like Poland and India with low - rank
coals, by lowering costs for the second generation of plants.
No «
clean coal» technology has been demonstrated with carbon capture and storage and no large - scale sequestration
projects have been undertaken.
«If we don't address the problem of
coal, it's game over for climate change,» says John Thompson, director of the
coal transition
project for the
Clean Air Task Force.
Environmentalists, many of whom believe that the term «
clean coal» is an oxymoron, nonetheless view the
project's cancellation as yet another indication that the Bush administration lacks the commitment required to reduce the rate of growth in atmospheric carbon dioxide emissions.
A new analysis by the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank in Washington, D.C., found that since the inception of
clean coal programs aimed at capturing CO2 earlier this decade, $ 3.5 billion has been spent by private companies to develop the technology via 18
projects — just a fraction (1/17) of their profits in 2007 alone, according to researcher Daniel Weiss.
Currently, there are five
coal - fired power plants registered as emission reduction
projects under the
Clean Development Mechanism (CDM), an international offsetting program run by an arm of the United Nations.
His behind - the - scenes maneuvering is likely to result in a bill that provides more money for
clean -
coal projects and assistance to industry than the House version, say insiders.
The MPs want more FGD to be used, and call on the government to support
clean coal demonstration
projects.
Reduced spending for «
clean coal» research The White House spending plan cuts funding for DoE's fossil - energy program, directing funds toward «
clean coal»
projects and eliminating spending for oil technology research.
The Canadian government has awarded C$ 285m (# 165m) to a flagship «
clean coal» gasification
project that promises to burn
coal without extracting it from the ground.
via:: Yahoo News Tar Sands, Energy Independence Tar Sands: The Most Destructive
Project on Earth Oil Shale Plant Power by «
Clean Coal» — and Cooled by Colorado River Water?
There is not a single similar institution in the U.S. — oh, you might point to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, managed jointly by Bechtel and Battelle (oil pipelines and «
clean coal» - FutureGen
projects), but they get their funding slashed every year, more or less — and they cancelled their most promising biofuel program, algal biofuel, back in 1997 — good luck with that.
You ask me, and individuals should get at least a 50 % tax break on residential solar
projects, and businesses should get a huge property and income tax break for investing in green energy (and by this I mean wind, solar, and hydro...»
clean coal» is a farce).
The two presidents pledged to promote cooperation on
cleaner uses of
coal, including large - scale carbon capture and storage (C.C.S.) demonstration
projects.
The E.C.P. will include collaborative
projects on renewable energy, smart grid,
clean transportation, green building,
clean coal, combined heat and power and energy efficiency.
Organizations that are publicizing the hydro - geological report (Earthjustice, the Environmental Integrity
Project, Southern Alliance for
Clean Energy and Tennessee
Clean Water Network) said that the failed TVA pond had been built using
coal ash as a construction material, and that some of the other existing impoundments were constructed in a similar manner.
The presidents welcomed: (i) a grant from the U.S. Trade and Development Agency to the China Power Engineering and Consulting Group Corporation to support a feasibility study for an integrated gasification combined cycle (I.G.C.C.) power plant in China using American technology, (ii) an agreement by Missouri - based Peabody Energy to invest and participate in GreenGen, a
project of several major Chinese energy companies to develop a near - zero emissions
coal - fired power plant, (iii) an agreement between G.E. and Shenhua Corporation to collaborate on the development and deployment of I.G.C.C. and other clean coal technologies; and (iv) an agreement between AES and Songzao Coal and Electric Company to use methane captured from a coal mine in Chongqing, China, to generate electricity and reduce greenhouse gas emissi
coal - fired power plant, (iii) an agreement between G.E. and Shenhua Corporation to collaborate on the development and deployment of I.G.C.C. and other
clean coal technologies; and (iv) an agreement between AES and Songzao Coal and Electric Company to use methane captured from a coal mine in Chongqing, China, to generate electricity and reduce greenhouse gas emissi
coal technologies; and (iv) an agreement between AES and Songzao
Coal and Electric Company to use methane captured from a coal mine in Chongqing, China, to generate electricity and reduce greenhouse gas emissi
Coal and Electric Company to use methane captured from a
coal mine in Chongqing, China, to generate electricity and reduce greenhouse gas emissi
coal mine in Chongqing, China, to generate electricity and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
The report, «Closing the Floodgates: How the
Coal Industry is Poisoning Our Water and How We Can Stop It,» was released by the Environmental Integrity
Project, The Sierra Club,
Clean Water Action, Earthjustice and Waterkeeper Alliance.
Then came «
Coal 21», a 21 - company voluntary levy promising $ 1 billion of «clean coal» projects but in five years spent barely a tenth as much, and that on the easy, paper end of the g
Coal 21», a 21 - company voluntary levy promising $ 1 billion of «
clean coal» projects but in five years spent barely a tenth as much, and that on the easy, paper end of the g
coal»
projects but in five years spent barely a tenth as much, and that on the easy, paper end of the game.
«The people of Washington have spoken mdash; this
project poses too much of a threat to our
clean air,
clean water and rapidly changing climate,» said Cesia Kearns, Deputy Campaign Director for the Sierra Club's Beyond
Coal campaign.
Europe Beyond
Coal is an alliance of civil society groups working to catalyse the closures of coal mines and power plants, prevent the building of any new coal projects and hasten the just transition to clean, renewable energy and energy efficie
Coal is an alliance of civil society groups working to catalyse the closures of
coal mines and power plants, prevent the building of any new coal projects and hasten the just transition to clean, renewable energy and energy efficie
coal mines and power plants, prevent the building of any new
coal projects and hasten the just transition to clean, renewable energy and energy efficie
coal projects and hasten the just transition to
clean, renewable energy and energy efficiency.
is an alliance of civil society groups working to catalyse the closures of
coal mines and power plants, prevent the building of any new
coal projects and hasten the just transition to
clean, renewable energy and energy efficiency.
In addition to generating some 113 MW of
clean, renewable electricity — enough to supply at least 40,000 homes — bringing the
project to fruition will result in the avoidance of some 300,000 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions as compared to
coal - fired power generation
The astonishing fact is that most CDM credits are made up of «
clean coal»
project credits.
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd in China last week reiterated Australia's support for joint research
projects on
clean coal with China.
Twenty million will go to education and retraining
coal workers, while the other $ 35 million will support the development of
clean energy and energy efficiency
projects.
C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, 12 California, 7, 68, 102, 128, 169 - 170, 187, 196, 232 - 234, 245 California Energy Commission, 232 Cambridge Media Environment Programme (CMEP), 167 - 168 Cambridge University, 102 Cameron, David, 11, 24, 218 Cameroon, 25 Campbell, Philip, 165 Canada, 22, 32, 64, 111, 115, 130, 134, 137, 156 - 157, 166, 169, 177, 211, 222, 224 - 226, 230, 236, 243 Canadian Meteorological and Oceanographic Society (CMOS), 15 Cap - and - trade, 20, 28, 40 - 41, 44, 170, 175 allowances (permits), 41 - 42, 176, 243 Capitalism, 34 - 35, 45 Capps, Lois, 135 Car (see vehicle) Carbon, 98, 130 Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS), 192 Carbon Capture and Storage Association, 164 Carbon credits (offsets), 28 - 29, 42 - 43, 45 Carbon Cycle, 80 - 82 Carbon dioxide (CO2), 9, 18, 23, 49 - 51, 53, 55, 66 - 67, 72 - 89, 91, 98 - 99, 110, 112, 115, 118, 128 - 132, 137, 139, 141 - 144, 152, 240 emissions, 12, 18 - 25, 28 - 30, 32 - 33, 36 - 38, 41 - 44, 47, 49, 53, 55, 71 - 72, 74, 77 - 78, 81 - 82, 108 - 109, 115, 132, 139, 169, 186, 199 - 201, 203 - 204, 209 - 211, 214, 217, 219, 224, 230 - 231, 238, 241, 243 - 244 Carbon Dioxide Analysis Center, 19 Carbon Expo, 42 Carbon, footprint, 3, 13, 29, 35, 41, 45, 110, 132 tax, 20, 44, 170 trading, 13, 20, 40, 43, 44, 176, 182 Carbon monoxide (CO), 120 Carbon Reduction Commitment (CRC), 44 Carlin, George, 17 Carter, Bob, 63 Carter, Jimmy, 186, 188 Cato Institute, 179 CBS, 141, 146 Center for Disease Control, 174 Center for the Study of Carbon Dioxide and Global Change, 62, 139 Centre for Policy Studies, 219 CERN (European Organization for Nuclear Research), 96 Chavez, Hugo, 34 Chicago Tribune, 146 China, 29, 32 - 33, 60 - 62, 120, 169, 176, 187 - 188, 211, 216, 225 - 226, 242 - 243 China's National Population and Planning Commission, 33 Chinese Academy of Sciences, 60 Chirac, Jacques, 36 Chlorofluorocarbons, 42 - 43, 50 Choi, Yong - Sang, 88 Christy, John, 105 Churchill, Winston, 214, 220 Chu, Steven, 187 Citibank (Citigroup), 40, 176
Clean Air Act, 85, 128 - 129
Clean Development Mechanism, 42 Climate Action Partnership, 14 Climate alarm, 4, 13, 21, 32, 35, 38, 56, 102 - 103, 115 - 117, 120, 137, 156, 168, 173, 182 Climate Audit, 66 Climate change, adaptation, 39, 110, 112 mitigation, 16, 39, 110 Climate Change and the Failure of Democracy, 34 Climate Change: Picturing the Science, 121 Climate Change Reconsidered, 242 Climate conference, 38 Cancun, 18, 29, 36 - 37, 124 - 125, 242 Copenhagen, 33, 36, 109, 125, 156, 158, 175, 241 - 242 Durban, 13, 36 - 37, 166, 242 - 243 Climategate, 2, 67, 152, 158 - 170, 180, 182, 242 Climate Protection Agreement, 12 Climate Research Unit (CRU), 48, 67, 120, 147, 152 - 153, 158 - 160, 162 - 163, 165 - 167, 169 Climate Science Register, 142 Climatism, definition, 2, 7 Clinton, Bill, 176, 178 Clinton Global Initiative, 176 CLOUD
project, 96 Club of Rome, 21, 186 CO2Science, 59, 61 - 62, 66, 131
Coal, 19 - 20, 39 - 41, 80, 126, 128 - 129, 175, 185 - 186, 188 - 190, 192 - 196, 199 - 201, 209, 214, 217, 219, 222, 229 Coase, Ronald, 145 Coca - Cola, 138 Cogley, Graham, 156 Cohen, David, 220 Colorado State University, 117, 181 Columbia University, 7 Columbus, Christopher, 58 Computer models, 16, 51 - 53, 56, 67, 72, 74,77 - 79, 82, 87, 89 - 91, 94, 105, 110 - 111, 120, 124, 138 - 140, 168, 171,173, 181, 238, 240, 246 Conference on the Changing Atmosphere, 15 Consensus, scientific, 12 Copenhagen Business School, 134 Coral, 53 Corporate Average Fuel Economy, 22 - 23 Cosmic Rays, 72, 93 - 99, 180 Credit Suisse, 176 Crow, Cheryl, 30 Crowley, Tom, 167 Cuadrilla Resources, 224 - 225 Curry, Judith, 164, 167 Cycles, natural, 3, 16, 57, 62 - 63, 66 - 69, 72, 80, 99, 103, 138, 238, 240 Milankovich, 62, 67, 80 Cyprus, 134 Czech Republic, 12, 37
350 uses online campaigns, grassroots organizing, and mass public actions to oppose new
coal, oil and gas
projects, take money out of the companies that are heating up the planet, and build 100 %
clean energy solutions that work for all.
Update: The FutureGen Alliance, the industry group behind the «
clean coal»
project just named Mattoon, Ill. as the site for the plant.
Reduce dependency on (imported) fossil fuels (balance of payments, reliance on potentially unfriendly or unstable nations as suppliers, high cost at the pump, all problems as seen from US viewpoint): — encourage nuclear power generation (cut red tape)-- encourage energy savings and improved efficiency
projects (tax breaks)-- encourage basic research into new (non fossil fuel) resources (subsidies)-- encourage imports from friendly neighbor, Canada (Keystone pipeline)-- encourage local oil and gas exploration («drill, baby, drill»)-- encourage «
clean coal»
projects (tax incentives)-- set goal to become energy independent within ten years
U.S. spending on big, near - commercial technology
projects in other countries, such as full - scale
clean coal plants in China, should be approached cautiously, as it is likely to raise political ire.
-- Instruct the new Energy Secretary to work with oil and gas industry to put together and implement an energy independence plan, with the clear goal of making the USA a net exporter of energy products within four years, at the same time creating millions of new jobs — Instruct the EPA Director to work with
coal burning companies to encourage «
clean coal»
projects (eliminating pollution), by offering tax incentives for those who invest in these
projects — Instruct the new Energy Secretary to set up a special task force to encourage the expansion of nuclear power and ease the permit procedure for new or expanded plants, with the goal of increasing nuclear power generation from 20 % to 25 % within four years
The concept of «
clean coal» was dealt a significant blow as Southern Company announced last week that it was suspending its
coal gasification
project in Mississippi.
The Washington Post provided a list of failed government energy
projects that included the Clinch River Breeder Reactor, the Synthetics Fuel Corporation, the hydrogen car, and «
clean coal» to remove carbon dioxide emissions from burning
coal and sequestering them.
Aaron, the efficiency reduction is more like 30 % than 15, based on
projects cited in my previous guest post here
clean coal.
From the very beginning, the story of utility giant Southern Company's Kemper
clean coal plant is a long trail of broken promises, according to a New York Times investigation — and the
project's numerous critics.
In late, January 2008, Burgeson arranged for a meeting the following month between Barbour, Bodman, and officials of Southern Company and Mississippi Power to discuss moving a federally - funded «
clean coal»
project from Orlando, Florida to a remote corner of eastern Mississippi.
They do give lip service to «
clean energy» but if you follow the money to the $ 2 billion
coal FutureGen
project, what do you find?