Sentences with phrase «clear about»

Even Meiklejohn, who makes no claim to being a Christian, appreciates perfectly what the source of so many of our humane ideals is, and he is especially clear about this in regard to the principles of education.

You're certainly correct that we need to be clear about the terms we are talking about, for example the first two «we's in this sentence refer to you and I specifically, or generally anyone who is engaging in a debate / discussion — but when I said «If war is wrong, then it follows that we should never go to war» the «we» meant Christians, when I'm talking to you I agree that we are talking about what we as followers of Jesus should do, not just generally members of a given country or society should do.

They are very clear about one thing: ghosts can be seen but not photographed.

The New Testament is clear about that in Hebrews 5:8 - 9 which states:

God's love knows no limits, but the Bible is also clear about the serious consequences of our moral failures.

St. Paul is pretty clear about that (1 Thessalonians 2:9).

I realize that I wasn't quite clear about religious addiction... it doesn't have to be a substance abuser and their behavior isn't necessarily what would be called abusive.

I've been clear about why I took down my original post and asked for my statement to be removed.

the bible is clear about killing g.ays.

Now with that said let me be clear about where I stand.

Since the logos of theology is an incarnate logos, so the task of theology is to get clear about how to walk in response to Easter.

I am very clear about the criticism about Christian faults, what I am asking is how do others resolve the question of evil in the world...

The bible is very clear about the gay lifestyle choice and the consequences.

I do not pretend to be utterly clear about this, but I take it that self - identity is as fragile a thing as self - integration, and as dependent as the latter is on resources that lie outside the individual qua individual.

Underhill is quite clear about detachment.

What I attempt here is to reflect on what, at this moment, seems to me reasonably clear about the continuities and shifts in my own attempts to pursue that almost impossible — but for me necessary — mode of inquiry, theological reflection.

I have described this as a case of thinking things through about education, getting clear about what we hope to accomplish and how we might best go about it.

because the bible is very clear about Jesus Christ.

A commitment to biblical realism will heighten rather than weaken our ability to converse with our neighbors in their own language, if we become clear about the differences which distinguish one language game from another.

The Bible is very clear about Islam coming one day and the evil it will spread.

However, he is clear about picking up your cross and following him.

Scripture's own witness is very clear about the purpose of the written word - «these [signs] are written that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that befieving you may have life in his name» (John 20:3 i).

Let us first be clear about a possible misconception of Whitehead's doctrine — a misconception perhaps shared indeed by D. H. Lawrence.

Evolutionists have been very clear about this distinction of fact and theory from the very beginning, if only because we have always acknowledged how far we are from completely understanding the mechanisms (theory) by which evolution (fact) occurred.

The first and greatest commandment is to love God, and the Bible is very clear about how we do that: we keep His commandments.

(No sexual abuse, just to be clear about that.)

So, many of my arguments on this particular subject have been efforts on my part to get clear about what the expansion of the concept of marriage to include same - sex unions will mean for the social fabric.

Scripture is fairly clear about what the role of the HS is.

Christians have to be clear about this.

Progressive culture warriors are clear about their intention to give sexual freedom priority over religious freedom.

The problem is this: Paul is quite clear about his own circumstances and why he is writing to the Roman church.

The Church was always clear about that.

your problem is that it's clear about things with which you disagree.

For as well as theoretical reflection on the moral significance of a decision, there are other ways and means by which a human being can either become clear about the rightness and conformity to God's will of a decision, or at least improve the conditions for its correct formation: the general cultivation of courage, unselfishness, self - denial, the practice of the art of making vital particular decisions which can not be deduced by purely theoretical consideration as this art is taught by the masters of the spiritual life.

Pope Francis has always been clear about where these two virtues» simplicity and fortitude» originate:

the bible is very clear about killing g.ays, non-virgin brides, disobedient children and anyone that works on the weekend.

This illustrates one of the general problems with the book: the author does not seem to be clear about her target audience, so she includes information ranging from the basic to the specialist.

It is difficult to be very specific or clear about this, for it is a suggestion that raises enormously complex problems; but it is possible in some cases that the facilities relevantly associated with particular conceptual competencies are musical, painterly, graphic, or mutely behavioral facilities rather than verbal facility.

I often wish God had made some things more clear about what happens after death.

Let's be clear about what this is, and what it isn't.

Consequently, we need to be clear about what sort of unity, what model of integral oneness, we are adopting when we discuss these issues.

Is it asking too much to be clear about religious matters?

Let us be clear about this: the text from Matthew refers not only to the chiefs of a legally established government (kings, etc.) or the controllers of wealth (bankers, etc.) but to all who come into positions of leadership.

I must say (and I want readers to be absolutely clear about this) that all the political and social movements which Christian friends of mine have joined precisely because they wanted to help the poor — that these movements very rarely show a concern to seek out, to find, to help the really poor.

The Scripture is very clear about how to receive eternal life.

That being said, the new President was not at all clear about what was to be done - meaning what was to be done without spilling rivers of blood and abandoning the American experiment in self - government.

Let us be clear about the status of this book.

But we need to be clear about this.

The Bible is very clear about sin.

the author doesn't say that one can't have an opinion on an issue just because the bible doesn't have a clear stance on it... he's simply saying that it doesn't make sense to have such a strong, skewed and one sided stance on an issue that the bible isn't clear about.