Sentences with phrase «clear as the sentencing»

It became abundantly clear as the sentencing proceeded that this would be no easy task.

Not exact matches

Similarly, spending nothing more than a sentence on Surface and Nokia — in the entire email, the word «Surface» appears twice and «Nokia» once — makes it as clear as can be that neither is the future.

I am less clear on the sense of the last sentence but one, but I believe that Whitehead means that the quantitative emotional intensity of the entity's satisfaction must of course be related to the intensity of its drive toward value as furnished by its subjective aim.

Further, as the last sentence makes clear, the author is pointing out that President Obama, and others whose Christian beliefs are more akin to his might «resurrect a dying brand of Christianity for a new generation.»

Always try to use the language so as to make quite clear what you mean and make sure your sentence couldn't mean anything else.

What I do think, is that we need to be clear that being a Christian, means we FOLLOW Christ, as its much more than a magic sentence.

It is the reality of what is potential, in its character of a real component of what is actual» (PR 103; italics added), We need now a clearer grasp of the nature of this potentiality and if we really understand what Whitehead means in this last sentence, when he refers to the character of this potentiality as «a real component of what is actual,» then we will understand the nature of the extensive continuum much more clearly.

You're certainly correct that we need to be clear about the terms we are talking about, for example the first two «we's in this sentence refer to you and I specifically, or generally anyone who is engaging in a debate / discussion — but when I said «If war is wrong, then it follows that we should never go to war» the «we» meant Christians, when I'm talking to you I agree that we are talking about what we as followers of Jesus should do, not just generally members of a given country or society should do.

Secondly, although the sentences «God exists» and «Jesus Christ was both God and man» look as if they state things someone might believe, they are not straightforward statements, and it is not immediately clear what believing themwould amount to.

However, it is clear that, grammatically speaking, the real subject of sentence 4, in other words the topic being discussed, is God, considered as primordial and consequent natures.

31 - 35); the clear indication of the nature of the Urim and Thummim as sacred lots cast to determine divine will (v. 41); and finally, the incidental insight we are given into the profoundly democratic nature of Israel's early monarchy in the effective popular protest to Saul's sentence of death upon Jonathan (vv.

Whoops — the next to last sentence should have been, «Some things are obviousâ $ «if one advocates for instance something in opposition to the clear teaching of the Bible, things like that murder is good, that compassion is evil, or extramarital sex is permissible; but some other matters are less clear, such as which political party is on Godâ $ ™ s side, or whether consuming beverage alcohol in moderation is a sin.

The writer has leapt from his angulum, and is behaving as the Old Testament prophets behaved when denouncing the evils of their times, though herein the quiet and clear, practical sentences of western man: «If this is not done, someone may rise, and, by means of publications, silence those preachers and refute the little book.

He has gone beyond argumentation — although in fact the Thesis form makes it clear that these demanding sentences are still intended as something to be debated.

That such a tradition as Käsemann describes existed in the early Church is clear enough, and that these sayings are at home in it is shown both by their form, the two - part sentence with the same verb in each referring to present action and eschatological judgement respectively, and by the fact that a Christian prophet makes use of one of them in Rev. 3.5 b («I will confess his name before my Father and before his angels»).

Finishing off their blocks as precisely as they complete each other's sentences, inseparable twins Maurkice and Mike Pouncey clear the way for Florida's revived rushing attack

Toddlers learn words very quickly, though they may not be ready to create clear sentences yet, perhaps confusing concepts such as «you and me.»

Lib Dems, as this sentence makes clear, like to think they are pursuing a decent economy (unlike Labour, who can't be trusted) without being cold - hearted business types (unlike the «nasty party» Tories).

But it's not clear just when the once - powerful disgraced former lawmaker will begin serving time if he is sentenced to prison as expected.

Giuliani's strategy was clear during his back - and - forth with Cuomo: Use «Comey» and «liar» as many times as possible in the same sentence.

Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat who as attorney general had helped investigate Espada, said in a statement on Friday that the sentence «sends a clear and direct message that those who defraud this state's taxpayers will be held accountable and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.»

You won't get a clear picture of who I am just by these few sentences I type here but family and friends would describe me as sweet, genuine, witty,...

It was clear to me and my classmates 40 years ago, as we gazed out the window during English class in our all - boys high school (a Catholic seminary) and watched the teenage kids from town «making out» on a stone wall; at least it was clear to Father Ignatius, who would threaten a «bastinado with salt rubbed in the wounds» if we didn't focus on the sentence that needed diagramming.

There is a clear and student friendly breakdown of the new question types, including tips for how to answer each question as well as sentence starters.

Compare that to a sentence from Collier's Encyclopedia, first published in 1950: «As he makes very clear to Starbuck, his first mate, Captain Ahab envisions in Moby - Dick the visible form of a malicious Fate which governs man thoughtlessly...» Or the description of Ahab in the 1953 Encyclopedia Americana: «a crazed captain whose one thought is the capture of a ferocious monster that had maimed him...» Or even this in CliffsNotes from 1966: «Ahab's monomania is seen then in his determination to view the White Whale as the symbol of all the evil of the universe.&raquAs he makes very clear to Starbuck, his first mate, Captain Ahab envisions in Moby - Dick the visible form of a malicious Fate which governs man thoughtlessly...» Or the description of Ahab in the 1953 Encyclopedia Americana: «a crazed captain whose one thought is the capture of a ferocious monster that had maimed him...» Or even this in CliffsNotes from 1966: «Ahab's monomania is seen then in his determination to view the White Whale as the symbol of all the evil of the universe.&raquas the symbol of all the evil of the universe.»

Teachers being led away in handcuffs and facing sentences usually reserved for members of organized crime families is as clear an indicator as any that high - stakes testing in this country has truly run amok.

You title clearly says Ninja 250, the the first sentence in the content says Ninja 300 (Well that's clear as mud.)

Ambiguous expressions, sentences that may not be quite as clear as they were in the writer's mind, and much more.

For creating to be clear, there must be no spelling, sentence structure or emphasis bungles, or anomaly in lingo, as these can undermine the impact of the composed work and the credibility of the author.

It is essential for students to utilize clear and brief language so as to make the sentences of the essay flow smoothly.

This will all become clearer as you read on if you were confused by that last sentence.

Indeed, it's quite likely that feral cat complaint calls to Monroe County, FWS, and USDA would taper off considerably, as it becomes clear that such a call is essentially a death sentence.

The only person to speak in full, clear sentences is the narrator; everyone else speaks in either bits of untranslated French, German, or, if you're playing as Freddie the American, grunts.

The Hollywood Roast includes some new features: the scoring system has been updated to show more clear and precise results; a new comeback mechanic will let players use their charged anger to deploy a crushing ending to a sentence; Character Creation Mode with custom screenshots to use as avatars, and much more.

As I see it, your confusion is best revealed in the following sentence: «you have temperature dropping when aerosol forcing increases from 2 to (let's say) 8, then rising again as the aerosols clear.&raquAs I see it, your confusion is best revealed in the following sentence: «you have temperature dropping when aerosol forcing increases from 2 to (let's say) 8, then rising again as the aerosols clear.&raquas the aerosols clear.»

I have, at various times, produced, not just sentences, but whole paragraphs which I thought were perfectly clear, but which readers denounced as hopelessly obscure.)

First, we should be clear that these paragraphs are discussing the same figure, as noted in the respective opening sentences.

But as written, the second sentence makes clear that he is rejecting both «likely» and «some» as being understatements.

See Stott et al «Attribution of Weather and Climate - Related Extreme Events», noting the sentence «There is clear evidence that climate has changed as a result of human - induced greenhouse gas emissions, and that across the globe some aspects of extremes have changed as a result.»

And as is clear from other sentences, they judge the point value most likely is in the middle of that range than at either end.

was based on a clear distinction between and hierarchy of legislative acts and non-legislative acts, where the «European regulation», as a «non-legislative act of general application», fell solely into the latter category (first sentence of the fourth subparagraph of Article I - 33 (1) of the Constitutional Treaty).

When you're ready, return to Step 1, and read those same stories again, except this time try to notice what the writer does with his or her opening sentences and paragraphs, as well as the words — simple, clear, direct words — that the writer uses.

For instance, is it clear that resentencing will be under Booker, with revisitation of all guideline findings that went into the original sentence, or will resentencing be limited to the change introduced by the amendment as though it existed at the time of original sentencing (even if the original sentencing was pre-Booker)?

Consequently, Rita's «meaning» may only became clear as lower courts revise (or reiterate) their approach to post-Booker sentencing law and procedure.

Even a very incomplete list gives an impression of the large number of significant opinions he has written: seminal administrative law cases such as Chevron v. NRDC and Massachusetts v. EPA, the intellectual property case Sony Corp v. Universal City Studios (which made clear that making individual videotapes of television programs did not constitute copyright infringement), important war on terror precedents such as Rasul v. Bush and Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, important criminal law cases such as Padilla v. Kentucky (holding that defense counsel must inform the defendant if a guilty plea carries a risk of deportation) and Atkins v. Virginia (which reversed precedent to hold it was unconstitutional to impose capital punishment on the mentally retarded), and of course Apprendi v. New Jersey (which revolutionized criminal sentencing by holding that the Sixth Amendment right to jury trial prohibited judges from enhancing criminal sentences beyond statutory maximums based on facts other than those decided by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt).

Consequently, Rita's «meaning» may only became clear as lower courts revise (or reiterate) their approach to post-Booker sentencing.

Instead, as a quick review of Congress's express commands in section 3553 (a) of the Sentencing Reform Act makes clear, Congress told judges to «impose a sentence sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with» the traditional purposes of sentencing (while also considering various relevant facts and factors including the guSentencing Reform Act makes clear, Congress told judges to «impose a sentence sufficient, but not greater than necessary, to comply with» the traditional purposes of sentencing (while also considering various relevant facts and factors including the gusentencing (while also considering various relevant facts and factors including the guidelines).

Moreover, it was clear from the outset that Lord Young would be involved not just in reviewing the system but also in implementing change, as can be seen from a further sentence in his terms of reference which added that: «Following the agreement of the report, to work with appropriate departments across government to bring the proposals into effect.»

I have to admit that when I read about white - collar crime cases and sentences — even those as outrageous as that of Jamie Olis (whose plight has been covered exhaustively by Tom Kirkendall at Houston's Clear Thinkers)-- I don't often think about what comes after.

[The novice] thinks through an idea only until it is passably clear to him, since, for his purposes, it needn't be any clearer; he dispenses with transitions because it's enough that he knows how his ideas connect; he uses a private system — or no system — of punctuation; he doesn't trouble to define his terms because he understands perfectly well what he means by them; he writes page after page without bothering to vary his sentence structure; he leaves off page numbers and footnotes; he paragraphs only when the mood strikes him; he ends abruptly when he decides he's had enough; he neglects to proofread the final job because the writing is over... Given his total self - orientation, it's no wonder that he fails repeatedly as a writer.