Sentences with phrase «clear distinction of»

Little is know about the differential effects of the various types of abuse and neglect — co-morbidity may hamper a clear distinction of differential effects.

As Andrew McAfee, explains in this Economist podcast, there is no clear distinction of the level of automation and indeed transformation of jobs.

I didn't see them make a clear distinction of exactly what data / methods they were talking about.

Johnson had said, (re «antibody method of searching for the responsible DNA»): «However, there was no clear distinction of western profiles between CDRM cases and control dogs.

The poster also lists Marvel Studios as the studio that brought blockbusters Avengers and Guardians of the Galaxy to the screen, creating a clear distinction of exactly which films Marvel wants viewers to think of when they see Ant - Man.

However, he also recognizes that «Serious inquiry seeks precision; precision entails... the clear distinction of details; and this proliferation of details changes the scale upon which ordinary inquiry can be conducted....

So it isn't that everything is God which is the case with pantheism of the eastern religions, but again this God created something separate from himself and there is a clear distinction of the two.

Traditional dogma affirms that Christ is one divine person but that there is a clear distinction of natures in Christ, human and divine.

At other times where there is a clear distinction of facts then it is black and white.

The Jews used a clearer distinction of function using ancient terms.

«This presents the clearest distinction of anyone they could have named: the Ryan budget,» Pelosi told reporters.

Not exact matches

A company that, say, releases several lines of detergent without making clear distinctions about why customers would want one brand over the other could be throwing money away, he says.

You've got to have clear lines of distinction.»

While the emotions and environment of an 11 - year - old girl have clear distinctions from that of an adult, there are profound parallels to what entrepreneurs experience in starting and running their own business.

If regulators recognize (and put out clear guidance) on the distinction between tokens that have passive income streams associated which rely solely on the work of highly centralized parties as security tokens and tokens that give holders the right to use an existing digital service or contribute work to an existing decentralized organization as non-security tokens, the democratization of ownership of non-security assets will continue.

That may not be the most clear of distinctions, but there is plenty of room for improvement in terms of reducing waste and increasing effectiveness in the sales cycle.

All ignored the very clear distinctions made in Leviticus for the two sets of rules for Jewish servants and gentile slaves.

@GOPer «All ignored the very clear distinctions made in Leviticus for the two sets of rules for Jewish servants and gentile slaves.»

While there are clear theological distinctions between these churches, the line between Pentecostal and non-Pentecostal is blurring due to the influx of charismatic phenomena into the ECMY and KHC.

The distinction is very clear, contraception is prevention, abortion is murder of a living child.

In fact, one of the more constructive criticisms I've heard from the complementarian camp is that, in the book, I did not make clear enough distinctions between how various complementarian organizations differ in their positions on biblical womanhood.

In the scientific method, there is a clear distinction between facts, which can be observed and / or measured, and theories, which are scientists» explanations and interpretations of the facts.

I think the Scripture makes a clear distinction between the conditions of receiving eternal life, and the conditions of being a disciple or follower of Jesus.

If the term «ecstasy» is applied at all to the giant figures in the succession from Amos to Second Isaiah, I would want to insist on Lindblom's distinction between ecstasy of the absorption type (involving loss of rational control) and that of the concentration type, and a very clear further distinction between the circumspective religion of the prophets and the more common ancient Eastern type of introspective, mystical piety.

A renewed adherence to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights requires a clearer distinction between rights as endowments that we must never violate and rights as claims that we must strive to satisfy.

First, it presses toward the elimination of any distinction (philosophical, political, and eventually legal) between relatively clear crimes against property and bodies and crimes against (for want of a better term) individual psychological well - being.

The distinction would be important if the vision of things as finite existents were in fact universal but had been brought to clear consciousness only by revelation.

There can be no doubt that Jesus went to great lengths to make a clear distinction between the kingdoms of this world and the Kingdom of God.

It always means having to bolt on the concept of mind, and losing an intelligibly clear distinction between the being of the creature and the being of the absolute.

Yes, it still makes a clear distinction between virgins and non-virgins, but most girls and guys who «make mistakes» are forgiven when they repent and have just as much of a chance of getting married as «virgins.»

Making a clear distinction between the founder and the work he launched and led, the Vatican statement also said that «the worthy apostolate of the Legionaries of Christ and of the association Regnum Christi is gratefully recognized.»

If there would be a distinction between the God of the Old Testament the God of the New Testament, the whole Bible would be a nonsense for it is clear that a divine being must always remain or be the same.

Evolutionists have been very clear about this distinction of fact and theory from the very beginning, if only because we have always acknowledged how far we are from completely understanding the mechanisms (theory) by which evolution (fact) occurred.

The distinction is not at all one between mind and matter, however, as Whitehead's reference to «a physical occasion of blind perceptivity» makes clear (RM 103).

Whatever truth there may be in the assertion that man makes God in his own image, the affirmation of faith carries with it a clear distinction between the concept of God (which indeed is man - made, just as all human concepts are man - made) and God himself.

These previous points once again are believed by many religions, but there are also many religions that don't make this clear distinction as with some forms of Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism and others which believe in the transmigration of the soul through reincarnation from humans to animals and vice versa.

3 In the only passage from The Problem of Christianity where the doctrine of the Trinity is discussed at length, Royce does not make clear whether he affirms an ontological triunity of persons within the Godhead or simply a distinction of divine persons within the religious experience of the believer (PC 135 - 39).

Yet there ought to be a clear distinction in our thinking between a critique of the effects of this genre, with its deceptive promises of liberation, and a more empathic inquiry into the writers and especially the readers of this literature, those searching for some kind of encouragement and relief that they have failed to find elsewhere.

So I think there is a clear distinction between the falls we all take, and of which Paul wrote when he said «the evil I do not wish to do, this I do, and the good I wish to do, this I do not do.

Within the common tradition, the meaning of the phrase becomes clear if we make a necessary distinction between authority and other forms of social control; in particular, domination, manipulation, and persuasion.

He is, rather, a very complex structured society which sustains, among many other societies, a regnant, personally ordered, subordinate society (an enduring object) which Whitehead refers to as «the soul of which Plato spoke» (Adventures of Ideas 267 — see also pp. 263 - 264 for a clear statement of the distinction between «the ordinary meaning of the term «man,» which includes the total bodily man, and the narrow sense of «man,» where «man» is considered a person in Whitehead's technical sense, i.e., as the regnant, personally ordered society which he identifies as his equivalent of Descartes» thinking substance and Plato's soul).

He remembers that there have been plenty of theologians down to the present day who by subtle doctrines and distinctions have not wanted to admit the meaning of that text from the Letter to Timothy, or who tried to evacuate its clear sense and force by saying that such non-Christians could not believe because they have not got the historical revelation of God's word and so could not be saved, because without real faith salvation is impossible.

Image gave way to reality, and Luke is concerned to make a clear distinction between John's baptism of water and that of John's divine cousin, Jesus, with the Holy Spirit and fire.

The ability to make such a distinction could be of real advantage to process theology, making its case more clear to friends and foes alike.

Cyberspace itself is filled with many options for religious identity, but they seem to be void of clear propositional and cultural distinctions.

I do think, however, that he provides a recent example of the lack of clear distinction between philosophical and systematic theology in process thought.

It makes a clear distinction between jihad, which is warfare with rules of engagement, and irjaf, which amounts to terrorism (religiously motivated violence against civilians).

Because ancient man did not draw such a clear line of distinction between myth and history, it was possible for the myth of the end - time to hold a particular kind of reality for him which it can not hold for us, and there is no point in attempting to disguise this difference.

It is commonly pointed out that in Pauline thought there is no clear distinction made between the Holy Spirit and the spirit of the risen Christ.43 Even in the Johannine tradition, as we have seen, the Holy Spirit was received by the disciples from the risen Jesus on Easter day.

When he draws such a very clear distinction between the physical body (of the here and now) and the spiritual body (of the resurrection) he is showing quite clearly that in his view resurrection is emphatically not «the resurrection of the flesh».