His lordship considered that that so - called finding involved
a clear error of law.
His lordship had already held that reason (ii) involved
a clear error of law.
Since the permit is based on the opinion of the Minister, the court will not interfere unless the Minister has made
a clear error of law, or his / her Minister's decision is unreasonable.
Not exact matches
While logistical failures and administrative
errors are a big part
of the problem, it is
clear that inadequate, antiquated, and burdensome
laws also play a major role.
James» submission, Belkin added, «essentially repeats the same legal
errors already made by the tenant - plaintiffs in misstating the
law, the applicable regulations and the
clear legislative history, all
of which demonstrate that the owner was lawfully permitted to deregulate apartments, notwithstanding a 421g tax abatement.»
According now to two separate modeling analyses published in Science, this
error would lead to the loss
of most
of the world's natural forest because
clearing those forests for bioenergy becomes one
of the cost - effective means
of complying with
laws to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
That's because the ISO's study, which focused on potential fuel security concerns in 2024 and 2025, contained
clear factual
errors as well other assumptions that are highly unlikely and, in some cases, contrary to state
laws that help customers reduce their electricity use and bills through energy efficiency and that require a growing percentage
of electricity to come from renewable resources.
There is no recent jurisprudence relating to Agency decisions which provides guidance on delineating
errors of law from
errors of fact — presumably because the privative clause precluding appeals on
errors of fact is so
clear.
Although the statute
of limitations regarding medical malpractice does state that no medical malpractice suit can be brought after five years has passed from the initial act or
error made by the doctor in question, Kentucky courts have made it
clear that this «five - year rule» is unconstitutional and should no longer be considered as part
of the
law.
The
law in British Columbia is however
clear, unless it could be said that, on the evidence properly adduced, it was not open to him to conclude as he did without making what is said to be a palpable and overriding
error, the Court
of Appeal can not interfere with the decision
of a trial judge.
From the claims LAWPRO has seen, it is
clear «dabblers» (lawyers acting outside
of their usual practice area) are more likely to commit malpractice
errors, and in particular a failure to know or apply substantive
law.
However, despite
clear direction over the course
of the development
of employment
law higher courts still have to correct
errors made by the lower courts.
The
Law Lords held that the Commission had misinterpreted the criteria for compensation and, sidestepping the clear words of the Act, held that this error of law meant there was no «determination» but that instead the decision was a nulli
Law Lords held that the Commission had misinterpreted the criteria for compensation and, sidestepping the
clear words
of the Act, held that this
error of law meant there was no «determination» but that instead the decision was a nulli
law meant there was no «determination» but that instead the decision was a nullity.