So whenever I see «evidence - based», I steer
clear of the hoax / scam.
Not exact matches
Following up on a blog post that Mark Zuckerberg posted a few weeks ago, the company now says it's testing and starting to roll out some changes focused on «the worst
of the worst, on the
clear hoaxes spread by spammers for their own gain.»
It's
clear this is already happening and we can expect more op - eds in major newspapers from the likes
of George Will, more full - page adverts from industry - funded propaganda mills masquerading as «conservative» think tanks, and more comments posted on every blog where global warming is discussed, denouncing the «vast liberal
hoax»
of anthropogenic global warming, because, you know, it's been proved that the earth isn't warming, and if it is, it has nothing to do with fossil fuels.
In the absence
of clear, national policy on climate change — aside from the current administration's tendency to ignore it or call it a
hoax — CCS advocates said carbon capture gives power to the private sector until the time is right.
■ We all smelled the carcass
of stinking fish in Copenhagen and the Leftist - lib agenda is all too
clear to ignore the real truth about the global warming
hoax.
Critics said this proved climate change was a
hoax, but the scientists were subsequently
cleared of any wrongdoing.
For instance, US Senator James Imhofe
of Kansas called climate change «the greatest
hoax ever» (Johnson, 2011) To claim that climate change science is the greatest
hoax ever is at minimum, if not a lie, reckless disregard for the truth given the number
of prestigious scientific organizations that have publicly supported the consensus view, the undeniable science supporting the conclusion that if greenhouse gases increase in the atmosphere some warming should be expected, the
clear link between rising greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere and increases in fossil fuel use around the world, as well undeniable increases in warming being that have been experienced at the global scale.
Steve Connor links the terms «
hoax» and «conspiracy,» saying, «Reading through the technical summary
of this draft (IPCC) report, it is
clear that no one could go away with the impression that climate change is some conspiratorial
hoax by the science establishment, as some would have us believe.»
Because
of possibility that such a lender letter could be a fraud or a
hoax, title companies will need to do serious diligence in order to
clear or eliminate the prior trust deed from title.