Sentences with phrase «clear words in a language»

Even when you communicate with clear words in a language we both share... I most certainly do not have access to your thoughts.

Not exact matches

John Canally, chief economic strategist for LPL Financial, said the language may continue to be used in coming months «as transition words» until «it becomes clear to FOMC members that the overall economy, the labor market, and inflation are well on their way toward hitting the FOMC's targets.»

The Best Practices advisor, without uttering a word, «speaks» loudly in simple actions such as putting agreements and disclosures and services and fees and expenses in plain language and clear writing.

It is after all rather important to emphasize that in a seventh - century text, predating all reflection on language, wherever that reflection may have occurred, we find this clear statement: the fact of human speech comes from God; but language is made up by the human race, which decides for itself — arbitrarily — the words, the rules, and the syntax.

With my belief that» language is limited» since I have many many friends who have english as a second language, and my own personal comprehension of the language and its meanings is limited based on my personal history... thank you for being thoroughly clear in your use of words.

Against Papias, it has been claimed, however, that Matthew can not be a translation from Hebrew or Aramaic (even though some of the Old Testament quotations seem to have come from the Hebrew Bible), especially since it is written in a clear Greek which reflects an advance over Mark's style and language; there is a play on the Greek words «kopsontai» and «opsontai» in Matthew 24:30.

This relationship is particularly clear in the Polish language because of the lexical link between the words stworca (creator) and tworca (craftsman).»

A clear example of language of formal definition appears in Ordinatio Sacradotalis, wherein Pope John Paul II uses words such as «We teach and declare» to define the Church's teaching on the priesthood.

A Catholic principle becomes ever clearer at this time, and Pius XII expressed it in these words: «Just as the substantial Word of God became like men in every respect except sin, so too the words of God, expressed in human languages, became like human language in every respect except error.»

Yesterday, in wording of a much stronger language on their stance opposing gay marriage, the draft from the Republican Party will address in the Republican National Convention next week, the party will make their anti-gay marriage stance clear:

While a clinician may find it difficult to parse whether a patient's stilted conversational manner is rooted in a lack of emotional connection or problems forming words, a brain scan in Belger's study made it clear, for example, that particular symptoms were more closely associated with disruption in the brain's emotional processing areas, whereas other symptoms were more closely associated with regions responsible for language and motor control.

Maybe not in words or anything you can hear, but with it's own silent language, your tastes and fashion sense come through loud and clear!

Unless either of you have uttered those immortal three words, stay clear of the most powerful word in the English language.

Similarly, Frances Goodman has explored the desires, compulsions, insecurities, and obsessions hidden in our use of language, saying that «After working with a number of media I eventually found that words and language had the uncanny ability to unnerve and get under people's skins, in a way that visual images and modes could not... sometimes [words] are simple and clear, and yet they are often full of innuendoes and subtexts».

Drawing a clear link between population growth and climate change, Adrian proposed a more comprehensive and holistic definition of sustainability than is often used, describing it as «the most over-used and misunderstood word in the English language today».

Humans use language as an imperfect signpost for more complex thought, but deep - learning AI, with its greater (if narrow) cognitive power, doesn't have human language biases (apart from those implicit in that corpus of used words) or limitations in finding the clear mathematical similarities.

At the same time, Rose says there is plenty that we don't know, such as whether or not it is safer for employers to use fewer words in a termination clause and avoid all - inclusive language, and whether, for public policy reasons, future court decisions will put an onus on employers to make clear to employees the differences between ESA entitlements and the common law before they sign ESA - only contracts.

Justice Stratas indicates, in the spirit of this article, that legislative words matter and that there are many contextual factors which might provide that a presumption of deferential review (or reasonableness, whatever we want to call it), is rebutted, and a narrower margin must be accepted: for example, «statutory recipes that must be followed,» statutory purposes, settled case law, discretionary decisions, and importantly, clear statutory language.

So, ignoring the every day English language meaning of the words, is there in fact a clear and precise definition of «assault» (in which case some sources are simply using it incorrectly), or do I just need to accept that there is confusion, even within the law itself, and rely on context to establish in any given instance which meaning is meant?

The Court recently confirmed in Ledcor Construction Ltd. v. Northbridge Indemnity Insurance Co. that where the language of a disputed clause is unambiguous, effect should be given to the clear meaning of the words of the clause.

This Court has no roving license, in even ordinary cases of statutory interpretation, to disregard clear language simply on the view that (in [the IRS's] words) Congress «must have intended» something broader... And still less do we have that warrant when the consequence would be to expand [benefits and penalties beyond the lines drawn by Congress]...

Stewart Title urged that the application judge erred, in turn, by: (i) failing to give effect to the clear meaning of the exception, and in finding ambiguity by looking at the word «paid» in isolation; (ii) «giving no weight to the factual matrix surrounding how the Policy language operates in practice and in its commercial context» when resolving the ambiguity; and (iii) resorting to contra proferentem reasoning before exhausting other methods of contract construction.