Sentences with phrase «cleared up for just»

After we made it to Paris on the 1st of March in the afternoon, we were quite lucky that the sky cleared up for just an hour after the beautiful Guy Laroche show and we managed to quickly take some photos of my ultra colourful outfit.

Not exact matches

Now it hopes to clear up any confusion about its post-removing policies, guidelines for which were just released.
Airlines» customer service practices have come under fire in recent months, and just last year, U.S. carriers were cleared in a federal investigation regarding exorbitant fare mark - ups in the wake of a deadly Amtrak derailment that drove up demand for air travel on some routes.
Let's have a clear understanding: the majority of equity crowdfunding (or crowdinvesting) platforms that have recently flooded the market, are registered broker - dealers companies (or have to work through registered broker dealers) and fundamentally is an alternative form of online investment banking for start - ups and early stage companies where as of now not a crowd — but only accredited investors are entitled to invest, just like in the good old days.
It's very clear that the Greek government will just end up caving every time its creditors ask new reforms of this government, and just recently they came up with a deal for another round of funding to ensure the government is signed up to what the creditors demanded.
I'd be just as likely to take you on a walk up the mountainside near our house, under the canopy of the trees, so you could listen to the water running in the dozens of creeks dancing down waterfalls of stones, the water bright and cold and clear, heading for the Fraser River, moving towards the fullness of complete ocean.
And hey, just for signing up, I send you a free copy of one of my ebooks, Skeleton Church, in which I suggest and clear and simple definition for the church which fits all types of church, and challenges all churches to get up off the pews (or out of the homes) and to follow Jesus into the world.
And for all this to just clear up.
I am grateful for the opportunity to do two things in response: first, to clear up a misunderstanding that my article may have suggested; and second, to reemphasize one of the main points of the piece — namely, that pacifists have a very difficult time trying to think in just war terms.
She is so secular — and one of my favorite passages in the fountainhead is near the last paragraph, where Roark and Dominique rise above the crappy buildings, and the CHURCHES, to get up into the clear sky - her point being — that religion is just one more thing that needs to be transcended for man to succeed.
Anytime you need to understand if what your thinking if it is correct just post it here I will clear it up for you that way you may be able to lead a fully productive life instead of one on the fringes of society.
We can only seek to be clear in what we say and not intentionally stir up controversy just for controversy's sake.
For most purposes it is just as well that this is true, but for purposes of clear theological definition, it is important always to have in mind where the history leaves off and the story takes For most purposes it is just as well that this is true, but for purposes of clear theological definition, it is important always to have in mind where the history leaves off and the story takes for purposes of clear theological definition, it is important always to have in mind where the history leaves off and the story takes up.
Just as it surely might have been cleared up in the Logic what «transition» is and means, before going over to write three volumes describing its workings in the categories, astounding the superstitious, and making so difficult the situation of one who would gladly owe much to the superior mind and express his gratitude for what he owes, but nevertheless can not over this forget what Hegel himself must have considered the matter of principal importance.
Before leaving for Lourdes, I had made it clear to Veronique, my wife, that she shouldn't get her hopes up and that I would come home just as I had left.
Hi Kate, I have actually just written a whole post to clear up the confusion between blenders and processors, and what they're used for which I think you will find helpful!
Flour will self - bleach if you just let it stand for a few weeks, but most millers don't take the time - a shot of bleach will clear up pesky colors.
These are super cute in glass dishes — and very presentable when dressed up with extra sprigs of mint and even fresh raspberries — these were also picked fresh from our garden by the kids just before we served them;) You could also serve them in plastic dishes (clear - plastic would be great for outdoor entertaining) or use a spring form and make it a tart!
For example, it is not completely clear in all cases just how the germ, bran, and endosperm wind up in the final version of a whole grain product that can legally be described as «100 % whole grain» by the FDA.
Wow wow wow I have tried everything possible on this earth EVERYTHING u can think of my acne has been around for 16 long and painful years I have been on 3 rounds of accutane (supposedly supposed to keep u clear) and everytime my acne came back I almost cried everyday looking in the mirror And then I bought coconut oil and WOW MY TROUBLES ARE GONE!!!!! Truly unbelievable I wish more people knew of this I Cnt wait to wake up every morning just to look at my clear bright beautiful skin And I Cnt keep my hands of it either it's so soft and amazing to feel Try it u wnt regret it
It's just milk made from nuts and seeds and has made no sense to my parents how one «milks» a nut so I hope I can clear some things up for them, if perhaps visually, here.
Not only does it help wake up my body, I'm able to also clear my head and do something that's just for me.
Me and my head chef would head out for a quick beer to catch up and talk about anything other than work just to clear our heads for half an hour.
Campbell has been playing for Arsenal for less than half a season and is only 23, yet you expect him to play like Sanchez in his prime smh... He'll get better and you shouldn't be too harsh, look at the number of through balls he makes each game, it's clear we just need a better CF and Alexis back up.
after Wenger bought Perez and decided not to use him it came clear to me Wenger lied to the fans for he were just an appeasement, to make us shut up and get off his bk and i was thumbed down on here.
They had a LOT to live up to, as Bayley vs. Sasha Banks from Saturday night is the new gold standard for WWE women's matches, but it's clear that the Divas Revolution is just getting started.
It had become clear last season that Arteta just isn't good enough, he distributes well and sets up play but defensively is nowhere near good enough in the big games — and as for Flamini he unfortunately has been found out.
Come summer we need to get rid of: Szczesny (not up tap scratch) Ospina (he wants more first team and has made it clear), Debuchy (complains rather than fights for his spot Mertesacker (Old, no pace, retire) Walcott (Never been up to scratch) Giroud (not consistent enough) Jenkinson (not good enough as second string) Flamini (please just go) Rosicky (retire and will be missed) Arteta (retire he did try for us)
the obvious fact is that the club began to stagnate in football terms a decade ago after the CL semi against man utd and has been in outright retreat over the last 3 years... some fans were calling for wenger to leave in 2011 - 12 as it was clear he could not cope with a more competitive environment others have been more tolerant, hanging on to fa cup glory and hoping that he would somehow self correct his weak and erratic management style but most now realise that is not possible and that the club will deteriorate further under his management so also want him gone, that has left a hard core of wenger loyalists who are either fixated with the past (selecting episodic good and bad times to justify wengers decade long failure) or too frightened of the future to contemplate a change (with selective reference to failed managerial changes by way of justification) or both, to conclude, through a mixture of panglossian fatalism and corporate philosophising, how lucky we are to have such an honourable and educated man in charge... along with their confused references to club loyalty and addiction to computer games these are troubled souls who need our sympathy and concerned medical advice... SO JUST F OFF STOCK UP ON CANNED SOUP AND GO SUPPORT ASTON VILLA ON FIFA!
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
As it is the need for hard work and improvement is now crystal clear so could this heavy defeat to Chelsea have been just the kick up the bum that Arsenal needed?
Joining a club of arsenal s stature has its ups and downs.There is a requirement of how our players should perform when on the pitch.The following is a list of players who were wrong to choose arsenal.Aaron ramsey - Even though he is the most favoured of all players at the club now.I cant help but think how it would have gone for Him if he decided to search for other greener pastures.He was a clear talented footballer during his time at cardiff but he hasnt been raised with the discipline at arsenal.You can always see ramseys all round strengths but sadly Its not helping him or the club with his foward moving pleasurr.He is so Over used and its sometimes difficult for him to get used to the rythm of the game.With time you realise he gets low ib confidence and his engine gets wasted.He needed somebody who would have managed him properly and with care and that person is certainpy not wenger.You would have been better off at Manu mate.Calum chambers - Came us a very talented player from southampton with raw talent.He was very good at first but wenger found a way to reduce his level of confidence.His inexperience was left exposed and wenger did nt do anything to resolve that problem and instead He looked for other talented players.Alex oxlade chamberlain - Another very talented player who needed only his skilled sharpened and his character modelled.That and he was ready to become a world beater.But wenger decided to let him run and run like a headless chicken causing him to be often injured and damaging his confidence.Who knows what would have happened to him gad he decided to look for more greener pasture.He is surely a much better player than this.Theo walcott - Another player who was tipped to have a very bright future.He had it in him.But all he needed was an appropriate manager who would nurture him with discipline and help him with his talent.But on Coming to arsenal he was given Much more responsiblities putting more weight on his shoulders on top of that another player who was recklessly managed with his talent and never coming off age because his character wasnt properly shaped.Mesut ozil - Al right i agree he perfoms well just recently.But imagine all the legendary players he was often compared to during his time at real madrid.On coming to arsenal he found no rotation often overused, suffered many injuries and his confidence dwindled.It is pretty clear arsene does not take any responsibility for players.And when at arsenal you have to be your own manager.You need not rely on your manager otherwise you might continue being the same player for the next many years.That is why each and every player are what they are because of their own efforts and wenger had nothing to do with it.Van persie was the same player for over 7 years untill he himself decided to change.Wenger only organises and prepares tge team while the rest is in your court.It is not what so many people make it out to be.Thats why we need to pressure wenger more than our own players.They are their own self managers and wenger needs to take that responsibility
When Samuel commented on why it was wrong to sell Lucas Perez you brought up stats between Walcott and Perez and in that you proved using the stats why Walcott is better.If Wenger didn't have blond love for some of his players then why did he keep benching Perez when he was performing yet the average guys always got a look in the squad.So if there are stats which prove Walcott is better aren't there stats which also prove Perez is better?Think about that.You also said Perez is not as good as some of us make out.The funny thing is yesterday we had an argument on Giroud and I also tried to imply that Giroud is not as good as we make out and you opposed.You always kept bringing stats up to defend him.Do you know if Bendtner or Chamakh had scored 25 goals for Arsenal in any season they'd still have been regarded as average.You know why?Because quality has nothing to do with stats and is just a kind pf talent or state.It seems to me that you think you know it all.You also denied the fact that Wenger likes French players and that if Perez was French he wouldn't have been out in one season stating other players as examples.It seems to me that you deny things which are clear for everyone to see.If you think you know better than everyone go and teach Wenger how to win the trophy this season.
I didn't watch the match last night as I was on the field playing I ran my heels off I was in their faces I was angry I got a well - deserved yellow and could have been sent off later on I intercepted a good few balls and assisted with 2 goals and won the match From the highlights and the analysis I understand the Arsenal were weak in midfield the Arsenal needs an enforcer someone just like me a motivator and in the face of the opponents a thorn in the side I also believe MR wenger was at fault we all knew we would be weak in defence the least MR wenger should have had is a strong fresh midfield after all we had a tough encounter with city + traveling why didn't he use Rosciky, Carzola and Campbell On a different note I like chamberland stature he is tall and has pace and energy why not adapt him to the defensive midfield position with clear emphasis to be in the opponents face The arsenal and Mr wenger need to wake up fast now we have this weekend to prepare for Chelsea if we believe we are title contenders
It's not that I think Vladimir Guerrero is a shoo - in, but I would have loved for him to make it, just to clear up some of the 10 - player - limit logjam.
For their second goal if he just stayed on his line Koscielny would have cleared it up.
We encouraged him to just stay away from the arena because we just knew that it was just going to be a real opportunity for him to clear his head and getting anywhere near the competition was going to be almost like suiting up and playing.
Having just been relegated from the Premier League, the Welsh side will be clear favourites, and manager Ole Gunnar Solskjaer is set to name Javi Guerra in the starting line - up for the first time.
but its clear that something is not working and has not been working for a number of years, how long do we put up and just accept it before its too late and every fan is institutionalized into believing that once AW goes the sky will fall in?
The same old crap again.I wonder how many more times will we have to hear it.They both are at arsenal and are playing all right so why does not all these f *** ing pundits shut the hell up??? I just hope we tie them down to long term contracts so that all these stories shut down for good.If they want to move, the least we can expect is for someone to just clear that they will be leaving in january on for free next summer
With Spurs now only five points clear of Chelsea after picking up just one point from their past two games, Conte's men still have an outside chance of making the top four and qualifying for the Champions League.
After making 144 appearances for the club, and scoring just once, it's quite clear to a large section of the Arsenal faithful, that Djourou's time might just be up.
With the World Cup in Russia just seven months away, national team managers will be getting a clearer picture of who will be included in their starting line - up for the tournament.
Hazard was causing all sorts of problems for Palace and thought he had made it 3 - 0 just before the break only for an offside flag to go up after James Tomkins had somehow cleared a Giroud shot moments earlier.
To be clear unlike many others, I see what Zlatan brings to the team aside from goals, his link up plays, his ability in the air, in fact he is our number one tool for maintaining possession especially when a long ball is played and all this no other player can offer better but just that sometimes our game will need our striker to run behind defenders and no one offer that more than Rashford.
They done so by the skin of their teeth in previous seasons, but last season Bolton finished a clear nine points above the drop, with the teams results definitely improving in the second half of the season under new manager Owen Coyle, so there were promising signs from the Reebok club that they can do a lot better than they for the most part last term, when positive form was almost non-existent and despite some valiant and brave efforts against some classy opponents they just couldn't convert their courageous performances into points which would have propelled them up the Premier League and into a more respectable finishing position.
In light of a few things that happened of late — the Supreme Court's ruling on marriage for same - sex couples, the addition of the word cisgender into the Oxford English Dictionary, the rise of the transgender movement, with Germany leading the way for parents to register their baby as something other than just boy or girl, the increase in stay - at home dads and egalitarian marriages, universities recognizing a third gender, the desire by some to be called they versus he or she, the declaration that 2015 is the year of the gender - neutral baby, it's clear we are moving toward a society that is busting up traditional views of gender and what men and women, husbands and wives, fathers and mothers look and act like.
I know this is really boring and you are skipping to the next comment, but I just wanted to throw you a big thanks — you cleared up some things for me!
I wasn't looking for advice to clear up a case of it, just his professional Attachment Parenting perspective on it.
That is to say, Lunch Money is a really great way for parents to get up to speed on how school lunch programs operate and areas where there may be clear room for improvement, but no parent should assume that just by reading Lunch Money he or she fully understands the challenges faced by their own food services director.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z