The results from the shuffled and the transformed data sets were interpreted as undermining the major gene theory for elbow dysplasia, although the mixed inheritance models provided
a clearly better fit to the data than did the polygenic models for both HD and ED.
Not exact matches
It's very clear from the graph that the forecast from scenario c
fits the
data better than the other two forecasts; that the
clearly counterfactual assumptions in scenario c produce a
better fit (so far) suggests that scenarios a and b are untrustworthy guides
to the future.
Fitting CDIAC emissions and land - use - change
data to the Keeling curve gave a much
better fit at 285 years than 287, so for the purposes of illustrating the follownig I've gone with that as a round number for the time being though
clearly this needs closer inspection.)