Sentences with phrase «clearly bring out»

This means that as a job seeker / candidate, your resume format should clearly bring out the career objectives so don't be vague.

Hi Paul, This article clearly bring out the fact that a small cap can also have steady returns, safety and growth potential.

Rainbows clearly bring out the best ideas.

With our services, we are able to clearly bring out this traits.

In doing so, he quotes from the NRSV translation of the Bible, which more clearly brings out the point that Sproul is trying to make:

The occasion clearly brought out the fight in the players, with a few of them clashing, but it is Aaron Ramsey who has been brought under the spotlight for his part in the drama.

To know more about this job profile, go through the given chaplain assistant resume example that clearly brings out the qualification and skills required along with the responsibilities handled by the chaplain assistant under different institutions.

The result was a resume that clearly brought out his experience and competencies in terms of the KSAs common to the career fields of human resources, administration, logistics, and resource management.

Not exact matches

«Twitter's problems are clearly not over, and while Jack Dorsey knows Twitter well, they really should bring in some outside perspective as most of their strategies so far are not working out so well.»

If for the distinction between psychology and physiology we substitute that between history and nature, his critique brings out clearly what I would agree is the deepest theoretical gulf between Whitehead and Heidegger.

With a certain simplification of the state of affairs, which however brings out more clearly the decisive factor without falsifying it, we might say that formerly the object and situation of a man's action were simply data supplied by nature with which he was in contact and by simple human realities which recurred from generation to generation again and again.

Clearly, the role of Mary is central in any Christian discussion about women, and Pope John Paul brought this out in his letter Mulieris Dignitatem:

I hope to bring out this point more clearly in the next several posts as I try to draw this series on Doctrinal Statements to a conclusion...

This tendency was clearly evident when the magazine was under the control of Charles Clayton Morrison, a Disciples of Christ Minister who brought the publication out of bankruptcy and ran it until his retirement in 1947.

The basis upon which Whitehead has made his distinction into his nine «categories» is, I submit, that which Aristotle was the first to have clearly and systematically brought out.

In John 18:5 - 6 Jesus sais «I AM he» and The power of his declaration of BEING GOD brought them to their knees... This clearly coincides with Exodus 3 when God appeared to Moses and Declared that his NAME was «I AM who I AM» Do you REALLY think that that is not by design??? Is this not also a very clear foreshadowing of the future (Romans 14:11, and Philliapians 2:10 - 11) Please oh please see how the Bible is so intricately intertwined and full of the The masters handiwork... Everything, all of life's questions are all within this book, not other sources, if one but will accept them, pray over them, and get the Lord's guidance... This is why I brought up 1 Cor 2:14, Which you took EXTREMELY out of context in the way I meant it to be discerned, which the verse itself explains I might begrudgingly add... John 8:24 after he tells them I am not of this world.

Recent discoveries and studies have brought this out very clearly.

This is clearly seen in the introduction to the Decalogue, «I am YHWH your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage».

It brings out the paradox more clearly.

It seemed necessary to bring out clearly the philosophical differences between Kantians and Whiteheadians which under lie our disagreements as to what political theology should be.

It would also bring out more clearly the formal ontological difference between biosphere and the «noosphere» of personal minds.

Its necessity to marriage which is clearly affirmed by Catholic tradition as brilliantly brought out by Gormally, actually, in Holloway's vision, flows from the pattern of the Annunciation.

Let's think about Genesis, the vivid picture of God bringing all things into being, all clearly set out: God the Creator, and his Word, and the Spirit hovering over the waters.

this kid had it all and could have been truly great but guess what, you can take the kid out of the hood but you can't always take the hood out of the kid, sterling hangs around with a bunch of idiots who think posting their mate online doing laughing gas is clever and there all living in London, bringing him in would be a huge mistake in my opinion and those of you suggesting to offer theo and money, Im so glad you don't run the club, theo is the best r winger in the league when fit, we also have Wellington silva coming back, not to mention ox to cover or Sanchez if we want to play Danny or mezut on the left, let city have Raheem and let their already volatile dressing room implode, let's get Cech, lacazette and a solid dm to compete with le coq, sell Chesney to inter for good money podolski could be used as make weight for Morgan or the like release flamini let arteta and Roz have there last season if they choose or let them go if they want more first team football, Rio to have one more loan Diaby pay as you play and last promote chuba who clearly is going to be an animal, with this I believe the title is ours and if the new 3 settle a real tilt at the cl is possible but please gooners get behind theo he is absolutely essential COYG

Yes clearly Edgar Davids is getting on a bit but given the paucity of options in our midfield with Alberto Aquilani still on the mend, Xabi Alonso gone, Lucas just about keeping his head above water and Javier Mascherano being a shadow of his former self, perhaps bringing in the out of contract Dutchman could be a useful addition to our relatively thin squad.

Chelsea have brought in some very good additions and have clearly funded such deals with sales of those Mourinho didn't rate (Luiz and Lukaku) so don't rule out another signing or two before the summer's out.

But he has brought in, over Wengers head, the two recent arrivals who are clearly intent (and have started, with Walcott and Coquelin) on clearing out the deadwood and want away players.

Kevin Magnussen's monster Belgian GP shunt brought out the red flag and was clearly one of the biggest accidents of the year.

Chambers was clearly uncomfortable against Montero on the right and it clearly seemed obvious to all for him to be brought in at CB and perhaps shift Gibbs or Monreal out right (perhaps even sacrifice one of them for Bellerin a natural RB with pace to match Montero)

Wenger is too old and soft to be breaking up fights, even though his brought in his German Shepard now it might be too tasking to control Sanchez since clearly he wants out so the Boss cant force him to follow his instructions.

Boldnesian, a son of Bold Ruler out of the champion race - mare Alanesian, will have to run just as brilliantly this week if he is to beat Saber Mountain, but Maloney is bringing him along slowly and with a championship clearly in mind.

Ok so Aston Villa were the underdogs but look at the fuss made out of a possible disallowed penalty and free kick outside the area for AV on the BBC, when Ozil was clearly brought down inside the penalty area, but didn't make a fuss about it, got up and carried on, Bellerin was smacked by Agbonlahor with what looked like a forearm smash, or possibly an elbow in head and was down for a while, when the ball was on it's way, but hadn't even reached him and we weren't even allowed a replay by the BBC, let alone a comment on a possible penalty / free kick / yellow card.

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

If Bolton have indeed penned a player loan deal into the deal that saw Gary Cahill move to Stamford Bridge then clearly they were very wise but if they have not then Owen Coyle may well find out that bringing in a top level player on a temporary deal may prove much harder now that the Trotters are in the Championship.

I wonder why we can bring out over 90 mill for Lemar and table under 60 for Auba who is clearly a better player.

Russian owner Roman Abramovich thought nothing of sacking a manager who brought him the long awaited maiden Champions League trophy just months after victory in Munich so clearly the Spaniard has every chance of not seeing out the current campaign.

The players clearly respect him and tough circumstances have brought the best out of him and this team.

Clearly the contact between the Toro Rosso drivers which caused the Safety Car period was not intentional (nor was it guaranteed to bring out a Safety Car — sorry, conspiracy fans!)

they just need to totally change the way they do business, bring in a proper director of football as Sullivan clearly isn't up to it, stop lying, get that column out the Sun and start spending an amount of money matching what they take in.

However, plenty of comments are made (or certain tones of voice used) that indicate clearly what they think: we brought this on ourselves by not letting him cry it out; we didn't try hard / long enough; we are too «soft» with him; we should have used a crib.

The full filing will be released next Monday, but the campaign clearly wants to get out ahead of the news that the longtime Democratic incumbent will bring a considerable war chest to the campaign.

«You can bring the case to court» Without standing, it would be thrown out immediately, they would never «find the provision is unconstitutional,» even if it clearly is.

In June, Buffalo Mayor Byron Brown, the wage board's chairman and a longtime Cuomo ally, said he and his fellow members clearly believed «a substantial» increase was needed to bring fast food workers up the economic ladder — despite persistent opposition from the business community, which often found itself drowned out at public hearings that served more or less as labor rallies.

Business and the markets will look to see who most clearly outlines a coherent and sustainable economic strategy for the country; who will demonstrate the clearest understanding of what is needed to bring Britain confi dently out of the recession and, above all, who demonstrates the clearest sense of leadership and direction.

But the Guardian brings out clearly, what the BBC reporting quite failed to make clear - that this was not one big protest, but a number of separate events.

So there's clearly a possibility that as opposed to maybe an Obama enthusiasm in the past, a Hawkins enthusiasm, most especially in Sryacuse may bring out a certain degree of vote that could in fact benefit Dan Maffei,» said Levy.

Hawking brought that out very clearly.

You can think of this just like ordering food at a restaurant: if you clearly state your order, the waiter knows exactly what to bring you.By contrast, if your order is confusing and you're not sure how you want your food prepared, the likelihood that your order will come out messed up increases.

The pinkish hues are tough on my red - based skin, where the blues of veins show through too clearly at times and any reddish - pinks bring out the flush in my face a little too much.