Sentences with phrase «clearly by statements»

Not exact matches

You can clearly see if your 401 (k) plan is up or down 20 percent by just opening up your statement and seeing it on the front page.

«America's leaders must honor our fundamental views by clearly rejecting expressions of hatred, bigotry and group supremacy, which run counter to the American ideal that all people are created equal,» he said in a statement.

«America's leaders must honor our fundamental values,» said Frazier said in a statement, «by clearly rejecting expressions of hatred, bigotry and group supremacy, which run counter to the American ideal that all people are created equal.»

Mr. Stamos said in his statement that «we decided that the responsible thing to do would be to make clear that our findings were consistent with those released by the U.S. intelligence community, which clearly connected the activity in their report to Russian state - sponsored actors.»

«America's leaders must honor our fundamental values by clearly rejecting expressions of hatred, bigotry and group supremacy, which run counter to the American ideal that all people are created equal,» Mr. Frazier said in a statement.

Archbishop Gomez's statement, quoted by Scaperlanda, clearly asserts that bishops should form the consciences of the laity and then turn them loose on the political order.

What are your credentials that you consider her qualified to make such a statement which is clearly biased by her belief.

Despite the strong public sentiment against such convictions after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Towers and the Pentagon, a perusal of public statements made by the leadership of the historic peace churches clearly indicates that, while they have repeatedly called for the perpetrators to be held accountable, they have not backed away from their commitment to nonviolence.

In order that the central theme may stand out clearly, its statement will be followed by a discussion of the context in which the text is set, indicating some of its sources and relationships.

The thrust of the cumulative argument of Cobb's book is that since Whitehead wrote statements that clearly imply that regional inclusion obtains between molecular and electronic occasions, we ought to be receptive to the suggestion that «soul» occasions include the regions of brain occasions and God includes the regions of all temporal occasions, because there is no principle involved in these latter two instances which has not been acknowledged by Whitehead himself in the case of the relations holding between molecular occasions and electronic occasions.

That would seem to be a more appropriate question for you to answer, seeing as how you're the one making the statement clearly in defense of gays in Uganda by way of alleging FMC support.

He concluded his statement by saying, «I think, I shall give my vote for integration with sadness of heart and the deepest misgivings because I can not see clearly that it is the leading of the Holy Spirit».37 F. Berkeli (formerly the mission secretary of the Lutheran World Federation) of Norway agreed with Max Warren and voiced the same apprehension about the administrative unity of the two councils.

But he clearly doesn't mean by this that the concept of omnipotence he attributes to God is derived solely from biblical statements, for he immediately adds that «unfortunately, Scripture contains no explicit statement concerning God's omnipotence, nor does it discuss the issue in any philosophical way.»

That Paul is clearly talking about traveling apostolic teachers is evidenced not only by his frequent references to «apostles» throughout the passage, but also the statements in verses 5 and 7 about taking a believing wife along with them, and going off to war.

In the language of many of those influenced by Barth, statements about what is real independently of human experience and thought are «metaphysical,» and these theologians hold that metaphysics is clearly disallowed by Barth as by contemporary philosophy in general.

Clearly by making that statement, you are ignoring other options for the case of a person not believing «evolution», namely.

Hartshorne responds by defining more clearly (what Brightman was to describe [September 5, 1943] as the «clearest statement of the thing we are puzzled about that one could well ask for») what he means by part and whole.

I have 14 instances marked, that are either statements by the author or quotes from GES members, where this issue is specified very clearly as being what is essential for the lost to believe for salvation — NOT whether you believe the message of the cross and Christ's deity - humanity are part of general New Testament revelation.

Two traits of classical theism were that it either (like Stoicism and Spinozism) clearly and consistently denied human freedom (in the straightforward sense of actions being not wholly determined by their causal conditions) or else ambiguously or contradictorily affirmed and denied causal determinism — truly classically in Aquinas's statement that God strictly causes our actions but in such fashion that we were also free to act otherwise.

I will illustrate what I mean by the clearly contradictory statements: «God exists.»

the statement is italicized by Jüngel Now whatever this may mean, it is clearly a faith statement rather than a historical statement (which would have to be limited to: «Jesus intended to bring the Kingdom to word...» or «Jesus» hearers believed that he brought the Kingdom...» or the like).

I am (a) A victim of child molestation (b) A r.ape victim trying to recover (c) A mental patient with paranoid delusions (d) A Christian The only discipline known to often cause people to kill others they have never met and / or to commit suicide in its furtherance is: (a) Architecture; (b) Philosophy; (c) Archeology; or (d) Religion What is it that most differentiates science and all other intellectual disciplines from religion: (a) Religion tells people not only what they should believe, but what they are morally obliged to believe on pain of divine retribution, whereas science, economics, medicine etc. has no «sacred cows» in terms of doctrine and go where the evidence leads them; (b) Religion can make a statement, such as «there is a composite god comprised of God the Father, Jesus and the Holy Spirit», and be totally immune from experimentation and challenge, whereas science can only make factual assertions when supported by considerable evidence; (c) Science and the scientific method is universal and consistent all over the World whereas religion is regional and a person's religious conviction, no matter how deeply held, is clearly nothing more than an accident of birth; or (d) All of the above.

And so in 2010 we find ourselves with a government statement, supported by a press release quoting the CES director that clearly implies, mistakenly it would seem, that the current position of the leadership of the Church in England and Wales is at odds with Catholic teaching.

Clearly unsettled by the emergence of competition in the shape of fellow bidders BBHO, Gina Rinehart's Hancock Prospecting released a statement on Tuesday, claiming (among other assertions of equal ludicrousness) that their bid was by far the superior one because it was more Australian.

As to what led to the punch, you seem to be quoting her statement to the police... which, by the way is full of inconsistencies and is contradicted by what was shown on the video (which her attorney tried to have suppressed)-- for instance, she says that she and a girlfriend entered the bar and were standing around smoking when Mixon and some of his friends approached her (clearly not so on the video)... Also, apparently the young lady was rather drunk and, according to Mixon, called him a Ni ** er and spit on him... and she has a pretty substantial rap sheet.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

An FA statement said: «The FA has submitted a claim that the standard punishment that would otherwise apply for the misconduct committed by the Bournemouth defender is «clearly insufficient».»

Once an AED committee is formed it needs to develop a mission statement which will not only help the committee stay focused by constantly reminding its members of its purpose and goals, but, by clearly stating that purpose and goals to the larger community, will help generate the broad - based community and political support an effective AED program requires.

While a recent position statement by one orthopedic group said that the relationship between injury and sports specialization «has not been clearly demonstrated,» [3] many experts attribute the overuse injury epidemic to year - round play and kids playing and on too many teams at the same time, which take their toll on a child's growing bones, joints, and muscles.

If one was able to get their hands on recent unbiased data (I.e. outside review) that clearly shows there is NO BPA at all in the product, that would be reassuring, Current statements by formula companies state that «no BPA is found in our products when we tested for it».

In Germany, although there is agreement - in theory - on the value of breastfeeding and it has been clearly said, that breastfeeding is the feeding method of choice for an infant, this statement is more a mantra than a real commitment by the government or health services to act.

And these are all things that have been attacked by the sheriff, and I wanted to send out a statement clearly to our residents to say that, he's gonna know that the town that he's coming into really doesn't align with the values that he's gonna be talking about.»

As for diminishing the «experience of those millions of people systematically murdered by totalitarian governments» - well, clearly the irony of that statement in the light of your continued support for Labour is - lost on you.

[Here is a statement from David Catalfamo, Adviser to the Long Campaign: «Someone is clearly spooked by Wendy Long's meteoric rise in the race to defeat Senator Gillibrand, the question is who?]

A video of the audience members» statements — clearly taken by one of King's detractors — shows how furious they are with the commissioner.

Clearly vulnerable Democrats would rather exit Congress voluntarily than be forced out by voters because of their support for Obamacare and other disastrous Democrat economic policies,» Rep. Greg Walden of Oregon, the National Republican Campaign Committee chairman, said in a statement.

The statement by the Deputy Minister of Health is clearly illiterate.

«Donald Trump has clearly demonstrated that he has both the guts and the fortitude to return our nation's jobs stolen by China, take on our enemies like ISIS, Iran, North Korea and Russia, and most importantly, reestablish the opportunity for our children and grandchildren to attain the American Dream,» Collins said in a statement.

«Rather than allow our entire state government to be controlled by extreme New York City Democrats who don't care about Upstate, Long Island or the Hudson Valley, hardworking New Yorkers are speaking loudly and clearly that they want Senate Republicans to have a seat at the table to help deliver meaningful tax relief, create new jobs and continue to move this state forward,» said Senate Republican Campaign Committee Chairwoman Cathy Young in a statement.

«After the deadly and ugly events in Charlottesville I am calling on President Trump to clearly and unequivocally condemn and denounce the violent protest organized by white supremacists and neo-Nazis including Richard Spencer and Jason Kessler, with support from David Duke,» Cuomo wrote in his online statement posted Sunday.

Responding to a bill of particulars against the administration by 60 scientists, including 20 Nobel laureates, Bromley scoffed, «You know perfectly well that it is very clearly a politically motivated statement.»

But there's still clearly a big gap to bridge,» Kevin McConway, statistician at Open University in Milton Keynes, U.K., said in a statement distributed by the United Kingdom's Science Media Centre (SMC) today.

During the run - up to the 2004 presidential election, while undergoing an fMRI bran scan, 30 men — half self - described as «strong» Republicans and half as «strong» Democrats — were tasked with assessing statements by both George W. Bush and John Kerry in which the candidates clearly contradicted themselves.

«The highly sensitive measurements from HFI have clearly demonstrated that reionization was a very quick process, starting fairly late in cosmic history and having half - reionized the Universe by the time it was about 700 million years old,» Jean - Loup Puget from Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale in Orsay, France, principal investigator of Planck's HFI, said in a statement released Wednesday.

Clearly, this is an incorrect statement since catabolism of lean body mass is reduced by ketone bodies (possibly through suppression of the activity of the branched - chain 2 - oxo acid dehydrogenase), which and probably explains the preservation of lean tissue observed during very - low - carbohydrate diets.

This year, with the Time's Up campaign in full swing and the Women's March events happening this weekend, the SAG Awards decided to quietly make a statement of its own by having women present all of the awards, creating a casually political vibe that everyone who got on stage seemed refreshingly comfortable with (right down to Morgan Freeman pointing out that the SAG trophy is clearly a specific gender).

As MrYd said there both supposedly on the disc for Xbox, apparently from what i read of a statement on gamespot via twitter it's hard to have 2 multiplayer games on one disc on PS4 without needing to make a separate menu, then R1MJAW said last night that apparently in Germany i think it was both games are on the PS4 disc, i went the download route it is quite hard to spot a lot of the spit and polish but if you do see images side by side it's clearly there lighting foliage and so on.

The effects are cool, the action incessant, the winking jokes (I swear there's even a sly political statement that had my audience burst into applause) work, maybe not so much because they're expertly written but they are spoken by an almost top heavy cast that's clearly having a ball.

However, this statement is contradicted in the first three slides, which clearly indicate that the changes in the Policy are driven by 1) changes in test availability and 2) an administrative rule that changes in the Policy must be voted on before November report card pick up day.

In a statement issued by government officials after 9 pm last night, Gibb apologised to schools for what he described as a «clearly regrettable incident».