Sentences with phrase «clearly calls out»

I make use of an automatic error measurement system that verifies any portfolio utilizing replacement assets accurately models the desired design intent, and every chart clearly calls out when returns are only estimated.

The Good Available offroad gear makes the 2015 Jeep Renegade capable of tackling tough trails, and its Jeep styling clearly calls out its lineage.

A good article which clearly calls out the necessity for a system's approach to education and the need for all education players to be held to account for learning outcomes.

Both jeans arrived with the correct size on the plastic bag (in tiny letters) but the large, bold tags on the jeans clearly called out the wrong size.

Several noted commenters, including author David Gaughran and the Alliance of Independent Authors» Orna Ross, took issue with the fact that Author Solutions was not clearly called out in the piece for its business practices, something that has actually resulted in lawsuits from their author clients.

Every author of self - help books, children's books, cook books, poetry and speculative fiction who ignored our review guidelines and sent us review requests even though we clearly call out that we don't review any of those categories.

What I find hypocrisy in is clearly called out: both his expensive paid programs and upsells, along with how he managed adversity in that area.

i discovered that credit karma doesn't handle 1099 - r forms correctly if they have the «taxable amount not determined» box checked (but they clearly call this out on the 1099 - r screen).

«Clearly call out features and benefits with easy - to - understand signage.»

There is no way a person would go from the paper to that file and see the change «clearly called out.»

The «correction» may have been «clearly called out» in one file, but it's difficult to imagine how a reader of the paper is expected to find that file.

The facts clearly call out that these concerns are real, and that those who believe otherwise are mistaken.

That is clearly called out in the Contract of Carriage as a thing UA is allowed to do.

Not exact matches

It's clearly what they call in economic terms «crowding out.»

Messenger's road to dollar signs hasn't been quite as clear, but CEO Mark Zuckerberg laid out Facebook's plans much more clearly during the earnings call.

I clearly remember one instance where my VP of marketing came into my office, shut the door, and told me flat out he wanted to fire one of the people in his department — let's call him Joe.

If your content's call to action includes signing up or registering for something, be sure your form or entry fields are laid out in a logical manner and clearly spell out what information is required.

These clearly fake claims were quickly called out by other Twitter users, many of whom were able to use reverse image searches to show that the online trolls were using stock photos and other misleading images as «proof» of alleged attacks against white patrons perpetrated by black moviegoers.

Clearly lays out the protocols of who (marketing, sales development, sales) does what (connect, email, call, voice mail) when and how often.

Clearly, there is biblical precedent for calling people out when they use the name of God to cover their own selfish or malicious intentions.)

Not to point out the obvious, (which, of course, I'm clearly going to do), but for someone who named himself after a Swedish carved wooden horse, calling anyone else out on their name is... silly.

Look, I didn't make fun of your poor spelling and grammar in your previous posts that indicated you had an IQ of 90, and I'm clearly not calling you out on your childish pettyness after someone realizes they made a mistake.

For me, it was a showing of considerable grace when Tony chose to pause his previous criticisms and piece together a response that extended some humanity to someone who has clearly been called out — by Tony multiple times and now, it seems, by all of Christianity.

But it was clearly not enough to call attention to the problem and to point out the needed theological changes.

Personalities stood out, clearly visualized in his imagination, and one by one he called them, even while in the world, not to be of it.

When God calls Abram out of his father's house, Abram is clearly enticed by the promise of greatness and prosperity.

Moreover in this strange order of things I am confronted with a personal God who not only called Abram out of Ur, but is clearly seeking me in the ministry of Jesus Christ.

We are called to be light and salt, and one way to do this is to stand up and speak out FOR BIBLICAL VALUES and against sin... yes, of course we should be preaching / teaching / living God's «theology of marriage» in our own marriages...... but God has clearly defined marriage as between one man and one woman, and therefore, when our government says it's otherwise, we should be light and salt and speak up, and vote accordingly.

In Bultmann, however, it stands out even more clearly in what he calls the eschatological event.

This is the more strange because the more deeply a concern is loaded with history, the past, things accomplished long ago, the more a church understands herself as a «pilgrim people of God» — that is, called, continuous, on the way, starting with a constitutive deed and living out her life in a hope which is both a given and an awaited consummation — the more clearly the church understands that, the more embarrassing her problem with a flat and impoverished language.

As Christians, we have a biblical call to care for the least of these that Christ laid out clearly in Matthew 25:40.

What I learned later was that they were also trailblazers, women who were clearly gifted and called by God into ministry, but who had to fight (gently and patiently, as it turned out) for the chance to serve the church — as women — as Ministers of Word and Sacrament.

~ the music and visual entertainment that resembles more to something spewed out of the pits of hell, then something human beings would dream up, unless they are demon possessed... ~ the perversion of God's natural order and His intent for human kind, and justifying of it, calling it good, even using the Name of Christ to justify it, such as this article is clearly showing...

that's not convenient — whether being called bigots for holding certain unpopular beliefs or (even more personally) having God call you out on something you really thought was right that he clearly does not.

He next moves on to a consideration of the method he proposes for his non-religious theology, and it turns out to be a certain species of linguistic analysis, but the theological context within which van Buren puts his method to work is, after all, that created by Bultmann and his demythologizing project, and van Buren very clearly sees the sense in which Bultmann, taken seriously, means the end of the rhetoric of neo-orthodoxy and the so - called biblical theology.

I do not believe in what is commonly called «carnal Christianity», and I think that Hebrews 10:26 - 27 clearly points out that error.

Several journalists clearly need a brush - up on People, In Style, and US magazines because people had to call out each celebrity for those of us who were clueless.

In January 2013 the non-governmental organisation Sustain, supported by 61 health organisations, called for a 20 pence per litre excise duty on sugar sweetened drinks.4 In February, the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges called for a 20 % tax on sugar sweetened drinks as part of its enquiry into clinical and public health solutions to the obesity epidemic.1 Although the UK government has indicated a preference for voluntary approaches to the control of obesity, it has not ruled out fiscal measures.14 Clearly, the idea of a sugar sweetened drink tax is gaining traction in the UK, but its effect on health remains uncertain.

«Any health professional calling for such taxes is clearly out of step with the rest of Australia, and according to the Ipsos research, the majority of Australian parents agree» said Parker.

Coutinho is the real problem for me in that Liverpool team.He can destroy midfield strategies.That's why I worry when I see us with no DMF.Years back (14/15) I remember Coquelin back pocketing Coutinho yet it's likely Wenger will bench him for no reason.That guy has so much potential if only he's used wisely.He has the abilityto mark players out of a game and intercept many passes.I know many of you will call me stupid and say he's average but imagine if Coquelin was used in a very defensive sense.Being brilliant tactically is all about producing the best system with the players you have and clearly that's not what's happening.I already lose hope when I see Kolasinac and Bellerin at WB whsn clearly it doesn't suit them.WB's are so important in a 3 back but clearly we've ignored that.

It's possible the call would have stood because there wasn't enough evidence to overturn it, but MLB's review headquarters also has access to more cameras than TBS (or any station airing a game), so who knows: maybe there would have been a perfect overhead view out there that would have clearly showed Holliday did or did not touch the plate.

My grandma use to say «you can't teach a old dog new tricks» I am not by any means calling arsene a dog but clearly he is out of tricks.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Anyone claiming iwobi doesn't deserves to be an arsenal player siting lack of potential or insufficient potential is clearly ignorant about football.this is a player requiring 2 to 3 changes in his to become world class.Need i remind my fellow gooners that out of the stellar caste of academy players which include dion zelalem, Jeff Adelaide, Chris willock, biellick, akpom etc iwobi is the only one making the first team this I assure you is not mere luck or coincidence or as sum here would be put it «being Wenger's favourite» - most so called wenger favourites are actually our best players - but becos of his immense potential, clear headedness and hard work.lest we forget he was actually in contention for the golden boy award.so does of you not seeing his potentials should f**k off.

Collins blasted Szczesny with the following tweet (since deleted): «#FF @ 13Szczesny13 or just give him a call, clearly isn't too fussed about giving his number out.

I still don't think it would iron out everything because the man in the stands would probably still be a ref or former ref and 90 % of the time they'd want to side with a colleague (and I think the Hazard one would still be given with VAR because they'd say «there is contact» so it gives the ref an out — even though it's not a penalty), but on one or two occasions when everyone would admit it is clearly a poor call then we'd all get the justice we want.

Bjorn calls out it's attachments more clearly.

Yes - if it is clearly productive to do so, such as calling out spelling words or checking a math problem that won't prove.

They were clearly the target audience for a groundbreaking report out in June this year called Risky Business, which used a risk management perspective to lay out the threat to agriculture, energy and coastal real estate in the US.

«We're calling out the fact that the rich are paying five thousand a plate to fund Trump and his transition, when he clearly said that he would do it on his own,» Blue said.