Not exact matches
Examining the most famous recent example of such a system, the rights - based liberalism of John Rawls, Greenawalt
clearly recognizes that this basic modernist
assumption is
false.
But the third
assumption — that the 2013 test is measuring the same thing as the 2012 test — is
clearly false, and the state admits it.
It's just that the
assumption that a bad review will always deter sales is
clearly false; sometimes it does, but often it doesn't.
That
assumption is
clearly false.
They construct their arguments so no other conclusion is possible but based on
assumptions which are blatantly
false or
clearly unknown.