Not exact matches
Then, given your
clearly profound understanding of the relevant science, you can explain how
humans came to possess a defunct gene for egg - yolk proteins in our placental mammal genomes and why the presence of this dead gene and the mutations rendering it defunct map to the lineages observable in the
fossil record?
Although the hominin
fossils were
clearly different from modern
humans and chimpanzees, the analysis found the rest of the
fossils fell into a single, highly variable group.
There are a number of lines of evidence which
clearly demonstrate that this increase is due to
human activities, primarily burning
fossil fuels.
I suggest look at the
fossil sequences of
human ancestors from early apes to australopithicus, homo erectus and homo habilis to homo sapiens, and notice how they morph one into the other quite smoothly, all explained by Darwinian evolution, while with respect the old testament verision is
clearly a creation myth like you find in early greek and roman culture etc, an imaginative guess, and very implausible in light of our current understanding of things.
The greenhouse gas increases, CO2 in particular, are also
clearly demonstrated to be the result of
fossil fuel burning by
humans.
U.S. National Academy of Sciences founded by Abraham Lincoln back in the 19th century, all the national academies of all of the major industrial nations around the world have all gone on record as stating
clearly that
humans are warming the planet and changing the climate through our continued burning of
fossil fuels.
Instead of
clearly defining
human CO2 emission, it is common to focus on the emission of CO2 from the process of burning carbon compounds [
fossil fuels] which used for energy needs the technologically advanced segment of the
human population.
Clearly, the accompanying graph depicts the never ending condition of natural climate change, providing further proof that
human fossil fuel emissions - and Exxon - are not to blame.