Sentences with phrase «clearly state the minimum»

Manufacturers often clearly state the minimum and maximum recommendation for their seats.

Not exact matches

The blend must contain a minimum of 10 % (by weight) of the origin named, the label must clearly state the percentage, and the size of the font on the label must adhere to specific guidelines.

Clearly, HTC and other unions have identified DeFrancisco as the biggest obstacle to getting the state Senate to approve the $ 15 minimum wage that Gov. Andrew Cuomo proposed in January.

If the expert's letter can not state clearly that the foreign scientist is at a minimum «outstanding,» then it should not be submitted to INS at all as it will only serve to dilute the INS officer?s level of esteem for the foreign scientist.

There were no guidelines to help define the postdoctoral experience, no minimum levels for payment, and no clearly stated rights or responsibilities.

The hybrid end - of - course / minimum - competency exam systems that have been in place in New York State since the early 1980s and in North Carolina since about 1990 clearly had the largest effects on test scores.

She concedes that while current contracts are accurate, they could more clearly state that the legislative minimum can change over time and that contracts would adjust accordingly.

State kennel laws apply to every kennel that keeps 26 or more dogs over the course of a year, and all of the kennels in the Winfrey / Ling report clearly would require state licensure and, at a minimum, at least two inspections a State kennel laws apply to every kennel that keeps 26 or more dogs over the course of a year, and all of the kennels in the Winfrey / Ling report clearly would require state licensure and, at a minimum, at least two inspections a state licensure and, at a minimum, at least two inspections a year.

Responsible manufactures of flea treatments state clearly on the packaging and in the instructions, the minimum age of the of the kitten that it is safe to use their product on.

Sunspot observations for the last 400 years clearly indicate that current levels of solar activity are very different from the state of the sun during the Maunder minimum (from approx. 1645 to 1715 AD) where almost no sunspots could be observed.

In summary, a strong case can be made that the US emissions reduction commitment for 2025 of 26 % to 28 % clearly fails to pass minimum ethical scrutiny when one considers: (a) the 2007 IPCC report on which the US likely relied upon to establish a 80 % reduction target by 2050 also called for 25 % to 40 % reduction by developed countries by 2020, and (b) although reasonable people may disagree with what «equity» means under the UNFCCC, the US commitments can't be reconciled with any reasonable interpretation of what «equity» requires, (c) the United States has expressly acknowledged that its commitments are based upon what can be achieved under existing US law not on what is required of it as a mater of justice, (d) it is clear that more ambitious US commitments have been blocked by arguments that alleged unacceptable costs to the US economy, arguments which have ignored US responsibilities to those most vulnerable to climate change, and (e) it is virtually certain that the US commitments can not be construed to be a fair allocation of the remaining carbon budget that is available for the entire world to limit warming to 2 °C.

The US current ghg emissions reductions commitments clearly fail to pass minimum ethical scrutiny for reasons stated here and summarized below.

Clearly a non-isothermal dry adiabatic column isn't a minimum energy state (as energy can be extracted, imagining an efficient thermal conduction system between top and bottom layers.

Also despite the fact that the positions that the United States and several other countries have frequently taken in Internationale climate negotiations have clearly flunked minimum ethical scrutiny, the US media has largely ignored the ethical and justice issues raised by the US response to climate change.

The policy itself should, at a minimum, clearly state which information you collect, who you share that information with, and how you will use the information.

He clearly rejects the idea that Article 53 entails that the Charter merely lays down a minimum standard of rights protection above which Member States would be free to apply a higher — national - standard of protection.

Since many states only require auto owners to carry minimum limits of $ 10,000 in coverage, cases which involve injuries clearly in excess of this minimum settle very quickly for payment of all of the policy proceeds.

If you chose to purchase only the minimum state - mandated level of auto liability coverage you could buy to get your car out on the road legally and get yourself a license plate, you would clearly pay a great deal less than you would to cover your vehicle with comprehensive, collision and uninsured / underinsured motorist coverage.