Sentences with phrase «clearly what their point»

I recommend that the older student state clearly what their point of view is, and defend it in one or two paragraphs.

Neither game has explained clearly what the point of their game actually is, and how it will work.

Not exact matches

«When you look at what is driving these results for Canada, we can point to some things that are clearly working, and some things on the horizon that it would be good to address now,» says Ed Farrington, executive vice president for retirement at Natixis.

«If MPs swallow their misgivings and simply sign along the dotted line, even though the government clearly has no intention of providing MPs with much meaningful detail for what the future holds, then at that point the Brexit juggernaut will proceed without any further meaningful restraint or scrutiny,» Clegg said.

Those policies don't clearly outline what types of videos can be used to make ad money, but they do point out that YouTube wouldn't be liable for any illegal activity from the video owner.

The point isn't to pick on Williams or anyone else who's clearly trying to figure out what's going on, or more precisely, what's changed in the basic macro-economic relationships such that prior guideposts are no longer reliable.

Work with Investors and Raise Capital They are also able to always clearly answer the key questions: ▪ How much capital the need to raise ▪ What does success look like in 12 months ▪ Who is on the team and why ▪ Use of funds ▪ Who is in charge ▪ The go - to - market strategy ▪ How to recruit talent So for those who still feel compelled to build startups, a good starting point is to understand what it takes, and what the expectations What does success look like in 12 months ▪ Who is on the team and why ▪ Use of funds ▪ Who is in charge ▪ The go - to - market strategy ▪ How to recruit talent So for those who still feel compelled to build startups, a good starting point is to understand what it takes, and what the expectations what it takes, and what the expectations what the expectations are.

Every time our founding fathers met with foreign heads of state and were asked «What is the official religion of the United States» they very clearly made the point that we have none.

I pointed out clearly the implications of what you said.

Perhaps you didn't mean what you wrote, but that clearly implies evidence exists that points to flaws in the reasoning and logic specific to atheism.

It took five years unraveling of what happened to us before I got to the point that I could name what went wrong, take responsibility for my part and identify the behaviors toward us that were clearly wrong and abusive.

Finally, the point at which we Christians have recognized our failure most clearly is in our long ignoring of what we now call «the integrity of creation.»

You can not point to any one and say this is the right one (with any authority other than «what you want to believe») Every religious text I've ever read is clearly written via the various perceptions of man, not some divine being.

ss clearly, I KNOW God, and you don't (as per your confession); so what's your point?

I know at this point its sort of kicking a dead horse, because I know we've both agreed that clearly we'll see what we want to see but your answer just begged the question, so this friend of yours is he a) a christian himself b) had he been praying for a job before c) why did your prayer take an entire week to be fulfilled d) is it a good job?

I read a lot of Calvinist literature in English and literature classes and in history class the closest thing I saw to anti-Christian sentiment was a comment about how Islamic scholars in West Africa criticized Christian teachers for doing exactly what the Islamic scholars had been doing (the hypocrisy was clearly pointed out).

And Exodus 21: 20 clearly gives notes on what should happen when a slave is beaten to the point of death or near death, not to mention the other rules of who should be set free, what to do with the slaves» children, how many years to keep a slave... It doesn't sound very different at all from our modern view of slavery.

The point is simply that unless we clearly see the superiority of what we receive as his students over every other thing that might be valued, we can not succeed in our discipleship to him.

Hugh Anderson has pointed out that James Denney, the well - known Scottish scholar of the beginning of the century, saw clearly that «what Easter revealed was the Cross standing at the heart of everything» and because of this may be said to have pre-figured «certain emphases that have appeared in Bultmann».

What Mark S. and others are clearly pointing out that these church people can say anything at Citizens of the US and if they want to speak in an official capacity for the church, that's fine too, but they should in no way be invited to the planning table with the joint chiefs the same way that PETA can stomp their feet all they want to but aren't actually involved with congress on how to tax meat products.

The point which emerges most clearly from these two illustrations is that the most destructive social evils of which we have knowledge appear on what, according to any previous conception of progress, have been high levels of intellectual and moral advance.

When an age matures to a point where it displays a radical transference of interest, and when its very language reveals that what former times felt as fact are no longer so felt, then the central task is clearly exposed.

It stands to reason that an all knowing eternal God could predict what you and I would believe no before He made and thus have already know whether we would except him or not And I'm not sure what you trying to say by that And because we want to tell others about Him and be used by Him to reach others And that commit does not make any sense, but clearly God is not a punk, as I have already demonstrated And your main point, as I already explained is false No, but my belief is true, none the less, it is by definition virtually impossible to prove anything And no, I don't need knee pads.

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

So many people failed to fill out that last question that it was obvious they didn't trust what I'd said; clearly, I would need to look at what they had written and decide at what points counseling was needed.

The plot is loosely held together by quite a bit of setting up and falling down, devoting much of its runtime to making you want to care about what the Pentagon Papers are, how the newspaper operates, and what's clearly at stake, before finally getting to the point where everything finally comes together, which is when the film is at its sharpest.

What evidence there is clearly does not support either the disciples of Hayek or Swedish social democrats; but neither, unfortunately, does the evidence locate the tilting - point.

Although Mike is unable at this point to state clearly what he does and does not believe, he is nevertheless thinking theologically.

Without the cover and pampering by the press, last night's debate clearly showed your faux liberal god for what he truly is... a man clearly in over his head and incapable of distinguishing between talking points, policies, and facts.

I do not believe in what is commonly called «carnal Christianity», and I think that Hebrews 10:26 - 27 clearly points out that error.

In «Condoms, HIV - AIDS and Africa — The Pope Was Right,» a Washington Post op - ed (March 29, 2009), Edward C. Green pointed out what the research clearly demonstrated.

But what makes Fish's book unique in this regard is not just the way he clearly wants to distance himself from the main implications of his own reader - response criticism: that the reader decides the meaning of a text, even to the point that the text quite disappears (the title of one of Fish's later books in fact plaintively asked, Is There a Text in This Class?).

In the majority of the novel, while more difficult topics (i.e. rape) clearly took place, scenes ended at a point where the reader had no doubt what would happen but was not left with detailed descriptions.

It's okay to do whatever you want to, but what's the point of mentioning it to someone who might clearly not appreciate it so much?

So far that is Wenger's biggest mistake and it will haunt him (and us) all season — either he drops his captain (and then what is the point of having a captain if you don't play him) or he perseveres with him when we clearly need someone better in that position and get hammered by the Chelseas of this world again this coming season.

If you had of actually read his comments more clearly you would have noticed him saying it is not in his hands and he is just pointing out what would be the case if it where.

Late money came in on the Seahawks to move the line down to a point in some places, and clearly those people knew what they were doing (or were just lucky!).

Martinez, who is now fighting for Premier League points as his side have widely underperformed this season, was clearly angry at what had gone on during the Chelsea game, adding.

Some Arsenal fans (and clearly our manager) have fallen into thinking that our best case scenario is forcing him to stay, patting themselves on the back for once putting football principles above what makes sense from a business point of view.

We must apreciate this.Now we don't have financiar problems anymore and this is clearly can see.We was at under 10 points to be champions and improve our place, and that with players like Flamini, Giroud, etc.Now let's see what happening in this transfer summer, if Wenger buy some quality midfielders, strikers and defenders, I am 100 % sure that next season we will win PL.

But if 5 points or more off CL places he is clearly more likely to be sacked If sixth or lower I believe the board will bow to fan pressure and do what they should have done ten years ago, in sacking him.

It would have to be a player who was clearly a shell of what he used to be, lasting long past the point of being useful.

This passion is what makes football breathe and you would be well advised to think clearly on this key point.

I have heard the argument that it clearly is the case that no one knows, so what is the point of writing about it — which rather ignores the fact that something is going to happen, even if we have no idea what that something is.

At a Progressive Communicators of DC lunch today, Mike McCurry made a lot of good points about modern political communications — between the Monica Lewinsky jokes clearly intended to ease what sounded like residual pain from his years as Bill Clinton's press secretary.

We did not discuss what may have caused this upset at any point, but my expression in front of Baroness Scott, was clearly accepted.

For what its worth I agree that Labour are focusing too much on the cost of living arguement, but your statement I commented on clearly contradicted the point you were making.

«I think that everyone should understand that if it got to the point where a parent was going to be put in jail for not having their child go to school, that is something that clearly would be over much intervention, and much opportunity to look at what you could do to help the parents and the child to realize the importance of this,» responded Elia.

Lastly, if what you state is true (which it is clearly not) then what is the point of exercising for weight loss?

The broader point goes beyond what one study did or did not show, and that was that Huntress was very clearly attempting to convince everyone that low protein diets lead to «100 % [early] mortality» No need to deny it, that was the very essence, and fraudulent essence of her very short post trying to mislead readers to exactly that conclusion: low protein means 100 % mortality, she asserted..