The problem with Malthusians, Bailey writes, is that they «can not let go of the simple but
clearly wrong idea that human beings are no different than a herd of deer when it comes to reproduction.»
They follow
clearly wrong ideas because they are dumb and gullible.
Not exact matches
There also
clearly is an alternative and christianity was also known for being radical for its
ideas and practices, so why wouldn't a moral god also stipulate that slavery was
wrong regardless of situation?
Face it, you have no
idea if there are any gods, or if satan inspired your book (a god would not have gotten so much
wrong) You act just like those ridiculous crewationist sites caliming science but
clearly do not understand how science works... you do not know how logic works.
Despite the fact that culture conflict is deeply ingrained in American politics (I am calling this the «broad» version of the culture - wars
idea), the «narrow» version of the argument found in Hunter's book (and many activists» rhetoric) is
clearly wrong.
Scientific studies have
clearly shown that monkeys have a clear
idea of fair and unfair, IOW, right and
wrong.
The importance of the book lies not in its detailed predictions, which were
clearly wrong, but in the theological
ideas which it reflects and advocates.
As I was watching I was trying to work out what had gone so
wrong with those two, the only
idea I could come up with was that although in training the energy of Sanchez and his determination to defend from the front has
clearly rubbed off; they track back with greater determination, the problem is they also seem to both be copying the man from Chile's unnecessary obsession of trying to beat at least two opponents before making his pass, Sanchez can get away with this — just — but it is downright infuriating when Walcott and Oxlade - Chamberlain try and do the same as neither of them has Sanchez» close control; nothing like it in fact, the result is that we lose possession so easily and so unnecessarily which gifts attacking opportunities to the opposition.
For people who believe that life begins at conception, the
idea of manipulating embryonic stem cells is
clearly wrong.
They included one at a burlesque club (he «
clearly got the
wrong idea»), one on a tour of London's public toilets («unusual, but actually acted as an ice - breaker») and another which saw her date drunkenly shout abuse at people on the Underground («I had to give him a lecture, which was awkward»).
Passersby might get the
wrong idea hearing the unscored rape screams
clearly coming from inside viewers» homes.
It'd be
wrong to say any
idea is too old to be revamped, not when people are still successfully updating games as ancient as Space Invaders and Pac - Man, but some concepts are
clearly a product of their time.
DK: Yes, there
clearly is a selective memory of successes and failures so that, in addition to all the other biases, people get the
wrong idea about how good they are.
delingpole
clearly a penis, and he's citing it for
wrong reasons, but «peer - to - peer» review is not an insane
idea