As he considers various strategies to maintain profitability — and even improve it — in the face of increasing competition and
client fee pressures, he realizes how alone he is.
In response to
client fee pressures, law firms are considering how to deliver legal services more cost - effectively for the client, while retaining and improving profitability.
Not exact matches
At the same time, Sorrell may have become a liability, at least symbolically, in an era when big
clients under
pressure to grow profit margins amid sluggish sales growth turned to agency
fees as a seemingly bottomless bucket of cost savings.
Some may still charge high
fees that enrich the operators or
pressure clients for further «donations» that put them deeper in debt.
Downward
pressure on legal
fees, Susskind believes, must drive sweeping changes to the way firms and
clients operate.
Economic influences and
client pressure provide the general guidelines for
fee - setting in private law firms.
Even as the recession eases, corporate
clients continue to
pressure their law firms to cut costs, increase efficiency, and move to fixed
fees and alternative
fee arrangements (AFAs).
We do not
pressure clients into anything that they do not want to do and for those
clients whose cases we accept, you will not have to pay anything — no
fees until we have successfully gotten you a resolution for your case.
An additional
pressure, as recorded in respondent comments in the Best Legal Advisers survey, is that some law firms have failed to update their
client service delivery model by offering lower
fees, alternative or fixed
fees, and by implementing more efficient internal procedures.
The deadlines, the trust
clients place in us, the responsibility, the judgment calls, the multiple sets of rules, the
pressure to generate business and collect
fees — few other professions face such demands.
With the added
pressure firms are seeing
clients place on their billing rates and
fees, the bottom - line impact of real estate expenses is becoming more significant.
If the
client is in a care facility, there may be instances where the facility
fees are not covered by the provincial healthcare system and the
clients» representative will be under financial
pressures to fund the cost of necessary care.
For a few years now
client pressure on
fees has been causing the most disturbance to the force within law firms but at the same time not much has dramatically changed in terms of
client service — and that's an area where there's bound to be innovation (or at least should be innovation) at every level and in every type of law.
In addition, mounting
fee pressure from
clients, generation Y / millennial working practices and technological change are all resulting in greater increased flexible working practices.
Client pressure on legal
fees is nothing new.
«98 % of law firms reported hiring a pricing professional because of alternative
fee arrangements (AFAs), followed by cost
pressure from
clients (77 %),» according to Mr. Johansen.
With fewer big deals, an emphasis on mediation to avoid litigation whenever possible, and
pressure from corporate
clients to lower
fees, law firms are feeling pinched and having to re-evaluate compensation plans for some lawyers.
There are a number of trends currently facing the legal profession (increased
client sophistication,
fee pressures, stagnant growth, the number of lawyers growing at a faster rate than the general population, succession planning needs and an increased emphasis on non-traditional skills — see the CBA Futures Report for a more fulsome list) that make the traditional practice model difficult (impossible?)
To ensure that our
clients do not feel additional financial
pressure, we offer our services on a contingency
fee basis.
Examples of these trends may include
fee pressures from
clients, changes in the industries the firm services, aggressive marketing by competitors, the firm's competitive advantages and disadvantages, mobility of partners among firms, and anticipated changes in the partnership as the result of retirement, withdrawal, etc..
«The downward
pressure on
fees by not only
clients but other lawyers is a problem.
There is already substantial
pressure in the marketplace, with businesses cutting back their legal spend and
clients demanding flat
fees and more predictable pricing across the board.
As DAs become more mainstream, I could also see their use becoming a
client expectation either directly or just in the natural course of things via
pressure to reduce costs and
fees: for us outside lawyers I suspect that
clients will come to demand proficiency with DAs as a cost saving tool.
Profit squeeze: Mid-size law firms will continue to be affected by a «profit squeeze» resulting from (a) increased overhead due to higher associate and staff salaries and benefits; (b) higher automation costs, professional liability insurance and marketing expenses; (c) partners» unwillingness / inability to increase hourly
fee rates for «commodity» type work to off - set higher overhead; (d) enhanced
client scrutiny of hourly rates, hours to produce work and lawyer and paralegal staffing of work assignments; (e)
pressure by corporate counsel for law firms to absorb more of the «soft costs;» (f) slower paying
clients, that affect cash flow and hence the availability of distributable dollars for partners; and (g) a great many mid-size law firms are burdened with higher debt.
Temporary lawyers are one response to
client pressures for lower
fees.
Lately, the health of the global economy has been making news headlines daily and, as a recent article in the Washington Post observes, the larger and more intense economic
pressures are forcing many
clients and lawyers to seriously reconsider how
fees for legal services are billed.
With the added
pressure firms are seeing
clients place on their billing rates and
fees, the bottom line impact of real estate expenses is becoming more significant.
Someone sent me an email yesterday passing along a blast email she had received from a listserv: Our firm's
clients are regularly
pressuring us to enter into alternative
fee arrangements.
The report concludes the legal market has now entered a new era marked by growing
pressures on costs and push - back from
clients on
fees and how legal work may be produced.
However, in an environment where there is a lack of clarity around the DBAs and
clients are putting lawyers under
fee pressure, we consider that CFAs will be around for little while longer.
While legal press headlines obsess about
client pressure on law firm
fees in what remains a buyer's market, firms are arguably losing double - digit profitability due to how they handle payment for costs other than their own time.
The rise of technology in legal practice, the growing
pressures from
clients to reduce legal
fees and the rise of alternative business structures (ABS) in the U.K. and Australia have created new opportunities and challenges.
All
clients are under such
fee pressures that we sometimes forget experts are under that as well....
The study also found that downward
pressure on
fees from
clients is still seen as the biggest threat to profitability — and concerns are continuing to grow.
Nevertheless, economic
pressures continue to prompt law firms and their
clients to seek some different arrangements that balance a
client's need for predictability and control of legal
fees with a law firm's need to generate profits.