Sentences with phrase «clients get to court»

Not exact matches

Legal expense insurance gains in popularity Reinsurance takes hard look at quake threats New pressures on Errors & Omissions could mean you wind up in court KPMG chats with Top Broker about its world view How identity theft victims» information is misused RSA helps entrepreneurs get social How to wow clients with a great meal and a touch of class

The fiduciary standard is getting a lot of attention in the United States once again as the Department of Labour's rule requiring advisors to act in the best interests of their clients was denied by an appeals court

I spend 8 exhausting hours in district court supporting a client of mine, only to get a $ 120 parking fine for spending six minutes too long in the wrong spot.

His attorney, Christopher Devane of Mineola, said after court that his client was innocent of the charge, and «clearly was caught up in the D.A.» s quest to get Venditto.»

Member comply with directions of the courts dating sites for divorced professionals or enforcement are working to get clients in order to create a schedule that makes.

Even if a client gets sued, our negotiators can settle the debt prior to the court case.»

A legitimate investigator can get a court order to get individual keys, but they won't get all the keys and therefore individual lawyers and clients aren't at risk from them.

Landry spends each day working and navigating the court system, in an effort to get his clients the best possible legal outcome.

We are not afraid to go to court to get our clients the compensation they deserve.

The Alberta Court of Appeal held that CFL practitioners must meet the same standard of care required of other family law practitioners — including taking appropriate steps to get the financial information needed to properly advise the client.

But above all else, our attorneys are trial lawyers, and they won't hesitate for a second to go to court if it's what it takes to get our clients justice.

Even if your law firm has an accountant, tracking hours, clients, rates, preparing invoices and collecting on those invoices is time you never get paid for, and writing notes to yourself in court or on the road is inefficient and error prone.

If a law firm is retained in a case involving multiple actions, it is not obligated to represent the client in all of the actions in order to get paid for the work it performed, says the British Columbia Court of Appeal.

I often see freelancers suggesting to other freelancers to use the small claim courts to get paid when the client is in another country.

I was lucky enough to have spent a lot of time during summers and school vacations with him, watching him represent clients, interact with law enforcement and court staff, chat with judges, and get up and try cases.

The Court of appeal held that CFL practitioners must meet the same standard of care required of other family law practitioners — including taking appropriate steps to get the financial information needed to properly advise the client.

That is a real benefit for clients because number one, the lawyers aren't afraid to make a limited court appearance because after the appearance they can get out and they don't have to keep representing that client and the client doesn't have to keep paying.

You are basically the educator and tour guide for your clients to get through the court system comfortably.

To protect happy hour (sorry I missed your call at 6; I was at my daughter's recital); To avoid hurt feelings (sure, those clothes are okay for court); to avoid recriminations (the jury foreman obviously hated you for some reason); to calm fears (the workhouse is not as bad as you've heard); to secure a client (of course you should divorce her, and the kids will be just fine); for career advancement (I'm soooo lucky to work for a brilliant partner like you); to grow one's reputation (I love that tie, your honor); to close a deal (no way would they ever sue over this); to get paid (yes, I will go after your 401 (k) if you don't pay my $ 1,500 fee).To protect happy hour (sorry I missed your call at 6; I was at my daughter's recital); To avoid hurt feelings (sure, those clothes are okay for court); to avoid recriminations (the jury foreman obviously hated you for some reason); to calm fears (the workhouse is not as bad as you've heard); to secure a client (of course you should divorce her, and the kids will be just fine); for career advancement (I'm soooo lucky to work for a brilliant partner like you); to grow one's reputation (I love that tie, your honor); to close a deal (no way would they ever sue over this); to get paid (yes, I will go after your 401 (k) if you don't pay my $ 1,500 fee).To avoid hurt feelings (sure, those clothes are okay for court); to avoid recriminations (the jury foreman obviously hated you for some reason); to calm fears (the workhouse is not as bad as you've heard); to secure a client (of course you should divorce her, and the kids will be just fine); for career advancement (I'm soooo lucky to work for a brilliant partner like you); to grow one's reputation (I love that tie, your honor); to close a deal (no way would they ever sue over this); to get paid (yes, I will go after your 401 (k) if you don't pay my $ 1,500 fee).to avoid recriminations (the jury foreman obviously hated you for some reason); to calm fears (the workhouse is not as bad as you've heard); to secure a client (of course you should divorce her, and the kids will be just fine); for career advancement (I'm soooo lucky to work for a brilliant partner like you); to grow one's reputation (I love that tie, your honor); to close a deal (no way would they ever sue over this); to get paid (yes, I will go after your 401 (k) if you don't pay my $ 1,500 fee).to calm fears (the workhouse is not as bad as you've heard); to secure a client (of course you should divorce her, and the kids will be just fine); for career advancement (I'm soooo lucky to work for a brilliant partner like you); to grow one's reputation (I love that tie, your honor); to close a deal (no way would they ever sue over this); to get paid (yes, I will go after your 401 (k) if you don't pay my $ 1,500 fee).to secure a client (of course you should divorce her, and the kids will be just fine); for career advancement (I'm soooo lucky to work for a brilliant partner like you); to grow one's reputation (I love that tie, your honor); to close a deal (no way would they ever sue over this); to get paid (yes, I will go after your 401 (k) if you don't pay my $ 1,500 fee).to work for a brilliant partner like you); to grow one's reputation (I love that tie, your honor); to close a deal (no way would they ever sue over this); to get paid (yes, I will go after your 401 (k) if you don't pay my $ 1,500 fee).to grow one's reputation (I love that tie, your honor); to close a deal (no way would they ever sue over this); to get paid (yes, I will go after your 401 (k) if you don't pay my $ 1,500 fee).to close a deal (no way would they ever sue over this); to get paid (yes, I will go after your 401 (k) if you don't pay my $ 1,500 fee).to get paid (yes, I will go after your 401 (k) if you don't pay my $ 1,500 fee)...

Even if your law firm has an accountant, tracking hours, clients, rates, preparing invoices and collecting on those invoices, it's time you never get paid for, and writing notes to yourself in court or on the road is inefficient and error prone.

The historic gap, which in the past has been canyon-esque as I'm fond of saying, this is where the courts developed the idea of fiduciary duty because as there were such dependence on the part of the client on the service provider because the client doesn't know and the client can't be expected to know whether or not they're being treated fairly or properly or what have you to getting good, you're getting good services, and I don't think that gap will ever close entirely but we are seeing the purchasers of legal services becoming more knowledgeable and more sophisticated, there is.

We tell our clients who believe they may be the targeted parent to never give up and we will develop a strategy to get experts and one judge involved in the case early on so the issue remains at the forefront of the court so it can ideally be resolved at a stage where alienation never fully develops or if it has that the alienation is stopped and the damaging symptoms reversed so the child has a healthy relationship with both parents.

If I offer a fixed - price «contested» divorce, for example, then the incentive for the client is to make full - use of that pricing model and to regularly and repeatedly want to: 1) talk about their case (i.e., their evil spouse's latest antics) on the phone or in - person; 2) file more motions to get their spouse to do something, to prevent their spouse from doing something, or to object to something the court ruled; 3) send more «demand letters» or make more phone calls to the opposing party or their attorney to tell them to return the car seat, or to complain that they dropped off the child 15 minutes late, etc; and 4) respond to ad hoc motions from the other side (motions for attorney's fees, motions to compel discovery, motions for summary disposition, motions to enforce, etc).

But, when it doesn't, Hilst has never hesitated to go to all out, take the case to court and get his clients what they rightfully deserve.

Also, since there is a right to counsel for indigent defendants in criminal cases, when a lawyer withdraws (especially for non-payment) the court now has to determine whether or not the client is indigent (which non-payment would typically support an inference of) and if so, the court must appoint a new lawyer who would have to do lots of redundant work to get up to speed in a case.

Since a lawyer is required to get a client's signature and / or approval for certain steps of a case, and often to show up in person at hearings as well, the lawyer is required to withdraw to preserve the lawyer's reputation because not doing so would force the lawyer to have violations of court rules that the lawyer is responsible for meeting on behalf of a client.

Even if you're law firm has an accountant, tracking hours, clients, rates, preparing invoices, and collecting on those invoices is time you never get paid for, and writing notes to yourself in court or on the road is inefficient and error prone.

That makes them ideal for any lawyer who has to access files or get work done away from the desk, whether it is in a court room, at a client's office, or in a coffee shop.

I also recall (I think) that when the defence counsel actually got their paper disclosure (the court having declined to compel them to accept the computer - based information), their clients promptly pleaded guilty (to something).

There, the courts have to award much higher amounts (close to double) to ensure that the client gets what the client needs because the courts know that a very large percentage (nearly half) is going to the lawyers.

Well before the first appearance at the Ontario Court of Justice in Orangeville, client retained John Navarrete to assist him with the charges and to get client back home.

There has been lots of opportunity to get involved in research, court hearings, client meetings and advising.

Some just want to play hard ball and force you to push the case to the Court house steps, if not a trial, in order to get fair personal injury compensation for my injured client.

The caption to Zell's diorama concluded that a court decision sanctioning the «Hot Potato» strategy would be so unfair to clients that it might «provide the necessary impetus to get Ohio's legislature to extend what is now the shortest statute of limitations on legal malpractice in the nation.»

Even if your law firm has an account, tracking hours, clients, rates, preparing invoices, and collecting on those invoices is time you never get paid for, and writing notes to yourself in court or on the road is inefficient and error prone.

I remember having clients who had to take three buses to get to my office or to court because they didn't have a car, for various reasons.

Which means (a) cases end up sitting still for months on end while both parties wait for the court to get around to hearing a motion, which is tough to explain to clients, and (b) parties who want to delay a case for 4 + months have a nice easy way to do it.

Other firms refer to us because they know we have the ability to get our clients into court quickly and maximize their potential for recovery.

He regularly travels to some of the most remote circuit courts in the Province of British Columbia to ensure that fairness and justice gets done for his client.

Recently Mr. Forteith was successful in getting the Dallas Court of Appeals to entirely reverse a trial court decision allowing his client to obtain a fair result in his slip and fall Court of Appeals to entirely reverse a trial court decision allowing his client to obtain a fair result in his slip and fall court decision allowing his client to obtain a fair result in his slip and fall case.

And we specialize in getting clients the largest insurance settlements and court awards in cases where another party is to blame for the injury.

Our skilled attorneys are familiar with all applicable theories of liability in state and federal courts and will fight in every way possible to get our clients the compensation they deserve.

Whilst the team will strive to get the best result for clients by agreement, they are also experienced litigators and will represent clients» interests in Court robustly when necessary.

You have to deal with clients, court (usually), the office, legal research, creditors, rent & bills, annoying sales people and somehow magically come up with time to market your services so that you can get new clients next month.

Accountable to Nobody, Class Actions Encourage Bad Behavior by Lawyers Having invented a client, the lawyers also get to choose a court.

I think very practically we see a lot of law firm lawyers encourage their junior associates to volunteer with us because we will give them an opportunity to get hands - on experience, working directly with clients, conducting interviews, gathering facts and then presenting them both in briefing and in oral argument to a court, much faster than a typical defense side large law firm context might provide.

Equally comfortable arguing a specific point of law to a federal court judge as he is explaining the big picture to a state court jury, Ian uses every aspect of his experience to get the best possible result for his clients.

The success of these techniques has required changes to the Rules of Court, training for judges in pre-trial techniques and genuine desire on the part of lawyers and their clients to get the case resolved.

From walking into the UN Criminal Court, or the FTC, a Fortune 10, or into the marbled halls of Cravath, my greatest triumph was getting over my fear to serve great clients.

I have often consulted with distraught clients who are either divorced or breaking up with significant other who exclaim «Men are never going to get a fair day in court» and feel they will never see their kids again