Our aligned product safety and insurance teams (including joint team members) act for
clients on product liability and product recall issues and, for those same clients, as policyholder in claims against insurers.
Mr. Graham has also advised
clients on product liability, franchisor - franchisee disputes and copyright infringement matters.
In addition to our courtroom capabilities, we routinely counsel
clients on products liability / mass tort exposure and risk management and prevention.
Not exact matches
Solely for the purposes of the
product governance requirements contained within: (a) EU Directive 2014 / 65 / EU on markets in financial instruments, as amended, or MiFID II; (b) Articles 9 and 10 of Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2017/593 supplementing MiFID II; and (c) local implementing measures, together, the MiFID II Product Governance Requirements, and disclaiming all and any liability, whether arising in tort, contract or otherwise, which any «manufacturer» (for the purposes of the MiFID II Product Governance Requirements) may otherwise have with respect thereto, the ADSs and ordinary shares have been subject to a product approval process, which has determined that such securities are: (i) compatible with an end target market of retail investors and investors who meet the criteria of professional clients and eligible counterparties, each as defined in MiFID II; and (ii) eligible for distribution through all distribution channels as are permitted by MiFID II, or the Target Market Asse
product governance requirements contained within: (a) EU Directive 2014 / 65 / EU
on markets in financial instruments, as amended, or MiFID II; (b) Articles 9 and 10 of Commission Delegated Directive (EU) 2017/593 supplementing MiFID II; and (c) local implementing measures, together, the MiFID II
Product Governance Requirements, and disclaiming all and any liability, whether arising in tort, contract or otherwise, which any «manufacturer» (for the purposes of the MiFID II Product Governance Requirements) may otherwise have with respect thereto, the ADSs and ordinary shares have been subject to a product approval process, which has determined that such securities are: (i) compatible with an end target market of retail investors and investors who meet the criteria of professional clients and eligible counterparties, each as defined in MiFID II; and (ii) eligible for distribution through all distribution channels as are permitted by MiFID II, or the Target Market Asse
Product Governance Requirements, and disclaiming all and any
liability, whether arising in tort, contract or otherwise, which any «manufacturer» (for the purposes of the MiFID II
Product Governance Requirements) may otherwise have with respect thereto, the ADSs and ordinary shares have been subject to a product approval process, which has determined that such securities are: (i) compatible with an end target market of retail investors and investors who meet the criteria of professional clients and eligible counterparties, each as defined in MiFID II; and (ii) eligible for distribution through all distribution channels as are permitted by MiFID II, or the Target Market Asse
Product Governance Requirements) may otherwise have with respect thereto, the ADSs and ordinary shares have been subject to a
product approval process, which has determined that such securities are: (i) compatible with an end target market of retail investors and investors who meet the criteria of professional clients and eligible counterparties, each as defined in MiFID II; and (ii) eligible for distribution through all distribution channels as are permitted by MiFID II, or the Target Market Asse
product approval process, which has determined that such securities are: (i) compatible with an end target market of retail investors and investors who meet the criteria of professional
clients and eligible counterparties, each as defined in MiFID II; and (ii) eligible for distribution through all distribution channels as are permitted by MiFID II, or the Target Market Assessment.
Our attorneys have fought for large settlements and won favorable judgments
on behalf many
clients in
product liability cases, and we know how to overcome powerful legal opposition.
She regularly advises and represents
clients in technology industries
on a range of legal issues, particularly in intellectual property, technology law, commercial disputes, data privacy,
product liability, and international trade.
Our attorneys have fought for large settlements and won favorable judgments
on behalf of many
clients in
product liability cases, and we know how to overcome powerful legal opposition.
John has served as an expert witness regarding issues in asbestos litigation; he is a frequent speaker and commentator
on products liability litigation; and he has coordinated
clients» lobbying efforts in the U.S. House and Senate to create national asbestos legislation.
Brendan has acted
on a wide range of insurance and reinsurance matters for Australian - based and international
clients, including flooding, storm, earthquake, fire and explosion events, electricity supply issues and machinery break - downs, as well as high - value class action litigation, public and
product liability, and subrogation claims.
John concentrates his practice
on representing corporate
clients in tort defense,
products liability, mass torts, class actions, toxic torts, asbestos, litigation management, food
liability, professional
liability, pharmaceutical and medical device litigation, environmental litigation, intellectual property litigation, construction defect litigation, general
liability, premises
liability, and business and insurance disputes.
Stephen has written and presented papers
on construction, subrogation and
product liability issues for a variety of
clients and insurance industry groups.
Charleston
product liability attorneys are focused and committed and pride themselves
on being results oriented for their
clients.
Carr Maloney counsels
clients on all aspects of
product liability matters and aggressively represents manufacturers and distributors faced with
product liability litigation.
He also advises his
clients on breach of contract, real estate disputes, business torts, breach of fiduciary duty and fraud claims,
products liability, ERISA claims, enforcement of non-competes, and shareholder derivative suits.
Whether acting
on the defence of large class action proceedings, the pursuit of subrogated recovery in highly technical matters, or resolving claims within modest deductibles, lawyers within our
Products Liability Group are committed to working closely with our
clients to implement cost - efficient, innovative, and proactive solutions.
Led by co-founders and senior partners Mary Quinn Cooper and William S. Leach, ECSL specializes in commercial litigation,
products liability, class actions and complex civil litigation
on a regional and national level for
clients ranging from small privately owned companies and government entities to Fortune 100 companies.
Prior to joining Lewis Wagner, Meghan was an associate in the New York firm Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry's insurance coverage group, where she represented insurance company
clients in insurance coverage litigation, and advised insurers
on exposure and
liability issues in wide array of tort and commercial contexts, including mass tort and class action litigation involving pharmaceuticals, chemical, transportation, news and entertainment, and oil and gas; environmental suits; FDA compliance claims; unfair competition and false advertising claims; intellectual property claims; construction defect; personal injury;
product liability; and associated breach of contract claims.
With a practice focused
on commercial litigation and the defense of
product manufacturers in mass tort and
products liability matters, Elan Hersh advises
clients on electronic discovery (eDiscovery), information governance, litigation readiness and response, cross-border discovery issues, and data...
In addition to representing manufacturers in litigation through trial and appeal, Andrew counsels
clients on risk mitigation and avoidance strategies, conducts
product liability risk assessments, drafts warnings and
product instructions, and advises
clients on drafting warranties and commercial terms and conditions.
We work with
clients on a wide array of
product liability cases, including those involving drugs and medical devices, building supplies, industrial equipment, and consumer
products.
On May 5, 2017, we secured a complete defense verdict for
client, Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc., in a 5 - day
product liability trial in the...
She also has experience conducting independent investigations
on behalf of corporate
clients, advising creditors
on matters involving the Personal Property Security Act, and representing manufacturers in
product liability disputes.
Clients have come to rely
on Freddy for his eight - year career as an aircraft maintenance technician, knowledge of federal aviation regulations and airport operations, and enthusiasm for aviation, to defend toxic tort and
products liability aviation cases.
Kate Vogelhuber is an associate in the firm's
products liability and complex tort practice, where she concentrates
on products liability defense and litigation management for a number of the firm's national
clients.
The Law Offices of James Scott Farrin consults with a national network of attorneys
on product liability, defective drugs, and defective
products cases in an attempt to provide the best representation we can for our
clients.
We have decades of experience advising
clients on risk management and compliance, and defending against class action, mass tort, multidistrict litigation, and individual actions alleging toxic tort and
product liability claims.
Julie is committed to helping her
clients fight back against big corporations and pharmaceutical companies, and focuses
on medical malpractice,
product liability and personal injury, though she also has experience with commercial litigation and class actions.
As an extension of his significant practice in the areas of insurance, civil
liability and
product liability, Robert has, for some 25 years, represented
clients in numerous aviation matters, acting primarily
on behalf of Canadian, American, British and French insurers, whether in defence or subrogation.
Brandon Myers represents
clients in a broad array of high - stakes litigation matters, with particular emphases
on advertising disputes,
product liability and consumer protection actions.
In a career spanning over 36 years, Mr. Ramos has achieved over $ 5 billion in monetary recoveries for his
clients, obtained injunctive relief in numerous matters, and successfully defended hundreds of
clients in defeating claims asserted,
on an individual or class basis in court and regulatory proceedings and arbitrations, in IP, antitrust, securities,
products liability, environmental, executive compensation, employee benefits, contract, warranty, insurance, corporate control, merger, hostile takeover, real estate, landlord - tenant, oil and gas, auction, tax, and theatrical and art law disputes.
Our
clients range from small companies to Fortune 50 companies, which underscore the value companies place
on the expertise of the attorneys in the
Products Liability Practice Group.
He was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1986 and currently focuses
on assisting
clients who are seeking compensation in personal injury, vehicle accident, medical malpractice, premises
liability, defective
product, and other accident cases.
Daniel B. Carroll represents
clients in a wide range of litigation with a primary focus
on pharmaceutical
products liability defense.
Our practice is based
on an inter-disciplinary model that allows us to become fully familiar with our
clients» businesses and to represent our
clients in a wide variety of disputes, including: Intellectual Property, Antitrust,
Product Liability, Government Investigations, Off - label Promotion, and Appeals.
As a commercial litigator, Darrick has advised
clients on and litigated cases involving complex commercial matters, including cyber security,
product liability, premises
liability, and breach of commercial agreements.
He has served two three - year terms
on the firm's Executive Committee as well as serving as the leader of the firm's Commercial Plaintiff's Litigation Group and the firm's
Product Liability Client Service Group.
Among our hundreds of posts, more than a handful touch
on Drug & Device Law in that they (1) involve cases with our
clients»
products far from
product liability or (2) involve issues we see in our cases being presented in very different types of cases.
Whether serving as lead trial counsel, working collaboratively with other law firms as part of a nationwide «virtual law firm,» coordinating document review and management, serving as national settlement processing counsel, or counseling
clients on ways to limit potential
liability exposure, members of Bryan Cave's Product Liability team have demonstrated a superior ability to work with clients to meet their leg
liability exposure, members of Bryan Cave's
Product Liability team have demonstrated a superior ability to work with clients to meet their leg
Liability team have demonstrated a superior ability to work with
clients to meet their legal needs.
She has extensive experience representing
clients in both federal and state courts
on complex commercial and business - related litigation matters, including oppressed minority shareholder and intra-company disputes, shareholders» rights and derivative litigation, restrictive covenants, construction litigation, contracts, insurance coverage litigation, and
products liability cases.
• Counseled
on liabilities and laws in regard to patents of
product • Structured contracts and agreements with
clients, employees and vendors • Drafted and amended complaints